CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Animal Production Science
  Food, Fibre and Pharmaceuticals from Animals
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notes for Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

Training

Publication Workshops


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 47(11)

Alternative replenishment regimens to maintain diazinon concentration during shower, plunge and immersion cage dipping of Merino sheep

G. W. Levot A C, R. D. Lund B

A Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, PMB 8, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
B Trangie Agricultural Research Centre, PMB 19, Trangie, NSW 2823, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: garry.levot@dpi.nsw.gov.au
 
PDF (273 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Constant replenishment of a 1000-L Buzzacott shower dip sump with diazinon solution at concentrations 100, 200, 300 or 500 mg/L failed to maintain the initial charge rate of 100 mg/L when short-wool Merino sheep were showered for 12 min. According to these regimens, by the completion of dipping the third pen of sheep working concentrations had dropped to 11, 29, 35 and 51 mg/L for sheep treated with replenishment solutions of 100, 200, 300 and 500 mg/L, respectively. These results suggest that the working concentration of diazinon sheep dips may be increased and maintained by raising the concentration of the replenishment solution. On average, wool samples taken from these sheep immediately after dipping contained 207, 453, 473 and 730 mg/kg, respectively. Comparison of dip concentration and wool residues indicated a linear relationship. This suggests that the capacity for Merino wool to absorb diazinon had not yet reached saturation. Compounding the difficulties with the reliability of constant replenishment shower dipping, current label directions for reinforcement and topping-up of diazinon sheep dips are unclear and often misinterpreted. A simpler and far more reliable strategy that ensured that each pen of sheep was treated similarly was tested. In this scheme, sufficient fresh dip wash (540 mg/L) from the replenishment tank was transferred to the dip sump to restore the initial sump volume after showering of each pen of sheep. This scheme reliably restored the sump concentration to the current nominal initial charge rate (100 mg/L) and was by far the easiest and most practical replenishment scheme tested. This should be the preferred strategy for shower dipping. Working concentrations of diazinon in a 5000-L mobile plunge dip charged at 100 mg/L and constantly replenished with 200 mg/L solution were maintained close to the nominal application rate of 100 mg/L. Current product label directions for reinforcement and topping-up of plunge dips were shown to be suitable for immersion cage dips operated according to these principles.

   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012