CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Animal Production Science
  Food, Fibre and Pharmaceuticals from Animals
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notes for Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

Training

Publication Workshops


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 48(7)

The effect of finishing diet and meat cuts on the attributes of four processed products from bull beef

M. M. Farouk A B, C. Podmore A, C. Boom A, G. Sheath A

A AgResearch Limited, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
B Corresponding author. Email: Mustafa.farouk@agresearch.co.nz
 
PDF (123 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Breakfast beef, stir-fry, pot-roast and oven-roast meats were prepared from the brisket, clod, inside round and knuckle of bulls on two pasture-based finishing diets (6 weeks of grain supplement before slaughter or no supplement). Diet affected the fatness of the raw meat but had no significant effect on the attributes assessed by the in-house consumer or trained panel. Stir fry from brisket, and pot roast and oven roast from brisket and clod, had higher (P < 0.001) cook yields than similar products from the other cuts. Overall, the order of acceptability of cuts with the appropriate inputs for processing the four products as determined by taste panels was: clod > knuckle > inside round > brisket; and that of product acceptability with appropriate processing was breakfast beef > oven roast > pot roast > stir fry. Female in-house consumer panellists assigned lower acceptability scores to the beef products than their male counterparts (P < 0.05). Because none of the muscles or products made from the muscles were totally rejected by the consumer panel (overall scores range from 4.2 to 7.0), there is potential to add value to these cuts through further processing.

Keywords: sensory evaluation.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012