CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Animal Production Science
  Food, Fibre and Pharmaceuticals from Animals
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notes for Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

Training

Publication Workshops


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 48(7)

An industry applicable model for predicting lean meat yield in lamb carcasses

D. L. Hopkins

NSW Department of Primary Industries, Centre for Sheep Meat Development, Cowra, NSW 2794, Australia. Email: David.Hopkins@dpi.nsw.gov.au
 
PDF (118 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

A wide selection of lamb types (n = 360) of mixed sex (ewes and wethers) were slaughtered at a commercial abattoir. Soft tissue depth at the GR site (thickness of tissue over the 12th rib, 110 mm from the midline) was measured in the chiller, using a GR knife (GR). Each carcass was subsequently broken down to a range of trimmed boneless retail cuts and the lean meat yield determined. The predominant industry model for predicting meat yield in Australia uses hot carcass weight (HCW) and tissue depth at the GR site. A moderate level of accuracy and precision was found when HCW and GR were used to predict lean meat yield (R2 = 40.5, r.s.d. = 2.39%), which could be improved markedly when loin muscle cross-sectional area at the 12th rib (EMA) was included in the model (R2 = 54.5, r.s.d. = 2.10%). A better result was achieved when the model included the weight of subcutaneous fat (SLFat) from the shortloin (R2 = 73.8, r.s.d. = 1.59%). A combination of SLFat and the weight of the shortloin muscle (SLMus) negated the need to include either GR or EMA in the model (R2 = 76.1, r.s.d. = 1.52%). The transportability of a model based on HCW, SLFat and SLMus was tested by randomly dividing the dataset and comparing the coefficients and the level of accuracy and precision. Collecting measures of EMA, SLFat and SLMus in boning rooms is potentially feasible. If this can be achieved under commercial conditions, a rigorous method for automatically predicting lean meat yield during boning could be applied. Application of the approach to large-scale research programs, where estimates of lean meat yield are required, would be possible at a reduced cost compared with alternative systems based on full carcass breakdown. A suitable model is given for this purpose.

Keywords: carcass measures.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012