CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Soil Research   
Soil Research
  Soil, Land Care & Environmental Research
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 42(3)

The liming effect of bauxite processing residue (red mud) on sandy soils

K. E. Snars, R. J. Gilkes and M. T. F. Wong

Australian Journal of Soil Research 42(3) 321 - 328

Abstract

Bauxite residue (red mud) is produced in large amounts in alumina refineries as a waste product of the Bayer process. This material has the potential to be used as a soil liming agent due to its high pH and high acid neutralisation capacity. Soil incubation experiments compared red mud from several Australian and overseas refineries to estimate its liming effect relative to lime (CaCO3). Two acid (pH 4.3, 4.6) sandy soils were mixed with 8 rates of 17 red muds, 3 limes, and NaOH. Values of EC and pH were measured at 1, 4, and 16 weeks incubation. Each red mud produced a different buffering curve when added to soil, although the shapes of curves could be classified into 5 behavioural groups. The liming equivalent of red mud decreased with increasing target soil pH. For a target pH of 6 the lime equivalent of the red muds was 11–42% for soil 1 and 13–50% for soil 2. No single characteristic of red mud could be used to accurately predict the liming equivalent, as its liming effect is due to several, variable constituents (e.g. free caustic, sodalite, calcite). The pH reached for a certain rate of addition of red mud to soil can be estimated from a comparison of the buffering (titration) curves of both the soil and the red mud. In every case, CaCO3 had a much larger liming capacity than red mud and red mud may not be an economical alternative to lime except where other benefits are associated with its use (e.g. lower cost, decreased P leaching, reduced water repellence).

Keywords: lime equivalent, pH buffering, predicted pH.



Full text doi:10.1071/SR03021

© CSIRO 2004

 
PDF (212 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012