CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Soil Research   
Soil Research
  Soil, Land Care & Environmental Research
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 42(8)

Response of excluder, indicator, and hyperaccumulator plants to nickel availability in soils

Stamatia Tina Massoura A B, Guillaume Echevarria B C, Elisabeth Leclerc-Cessac A, Jean Louis Morel B

A Andra, Agence pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs, Parc de la Croix Blanche, 1/7, rue Jean Monnet, F-92298, Châtenay-Malabry cedex, France.
B Laboratoire Sols et Environnement, ENSAIA-INRA/INPL-UMR 1120, BP: 172, 2, avenue de la Forêt de Haye, F-54505, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy cedex, France.
C Corresponding author. Email: guillaume.echevarria@ensaia.inpl-nancy.fr
 
PDF (116 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Availability is a key property for the assessment of soil-to-plant transfer of heavy metals. This work was conducted to determine whether the available pool of Ni differs according to the ability of plants to take up and accumulate the metal. An excluder plant species (Triticum aestivum L.), an indicator (Trifolium pratense L.), and 3 populations of the Ni-hyperaccumulator Alyssum murale (Waldst. & Kit.) were grown for 90 days on 4 soils with a gradient of concentrations of total and available Ni. Isotopic exchange methods with 63Ni ions were used to measure the exchangeable soil Ni (E-value, intensity, and capacity factors), to monitor its uptake by plants and to determine the size of the available pool (L-value). Results showed that, for a given soil, the L-values were similar for all plant species, showing that they all access the same Ni exchangeable pool regardless of their Ni uptake capacity. Also, L-values for a given soil were equal to the E-value calculated for a 90-day period, demonstrating that plant Ni originated from the isotopically exchangeable soil Ni. This pool can be accurately and simply determined with the isotopic exchange kinetic methods run on soil–solution batch systems without plants. Moreover, the results indicate that the plant species take up Ni as a response to ‘intensity’, ‘capacity’, and ‘quantity’ soil factors and that E-value alone is not enough to predict plant uptake. This work suggests a uniform behaviour of the plants tested towards soil Ni and may have practical applications in phytoextraction and phytomining, as the plants removed Ni exclusively from the exchangeable pool.

Keywords: Ni, E-value, L-value, phytoavailability, hyperaccumulator, indicator, excluder.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012