CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Soil Research   
Soil Research
  Soil, Land Care & Environmental Research
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 43(4)

Soil physical quality under cattle grazing of a winter-fed brassica crop

J. J. Drewry A B, R. J. Paton A

A Land and Environmental Management, AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
B Corresponding author. Current address: Integrated Catchment and Management Centre, Building 48A Linnaeus Way, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. Email: john.drewry@anu.edu.au
 
PDF (124 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

This 2-year study investigated the effects of winter brassica forage crop grazing treatments on soil physical properties on a Fragic Pallic soil, susceptible to compaction, in South Otago, New Zealand. Soil physical measurements including bulk density, percentage of pores >300 μm, macroporosity (air-filled porosity; percentage of pores >30 μm), total porosity, air permeability, and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) were taken 1.5 and 4 months after completion of winter grazing in year 1, and 2.5 months after grazing in year 2. Treatment main effects in year 1 for macroporosity were ungrazed crop (P < 0.05, 15.5%), established pasture (12.2%), crop on-off grazing (12.8%), crop grazed with back fence (9.6%), and current practice (strip grazing without a back-fence, 8.6%). During both winters the soil was generally more compact at 0.05–0.10 m depth than at 0.15–0.20 m, particularly for the current practice treatment, which may increase the risk of overland flow. Micro-topography differences between hump and hoof-hollow areas for the current practice treatment were also investigated during one sampling, with very low values of Ksat at 0–0.05 m in hoof-hollow areas (P < 0.05, 5 mm/h), compared with hump areas (129 mm/h). Overall, the crop on-off grazing treatment and, with some exceptions, the grazed with back fence treatment have some merit for reducing damage to soil physical properties compared with current practice.

Keywords: pugging, hydraulic conductivity, treading, soil compaction.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012