CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Soil Research   
Soil Research
  Soil, Land Care & Environmental Research
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 43(8)

Irrigation controlled by a wetting front detector: field evaluation under sprinkler irrigation

R. J. Stirzaker A, P. A. Hutchinson B

A Corresponding author. CSIRO Land and Water, PO Box 1666, ACT 2601, Australia. Email: Richard.stirzaker@csiro.au
B CSIRO Land and Water, Private Bag 3, Griffith, NSW 2680, Australia.
 
PDF (209 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

The accuracy of scheduling irrigation to turf by sprinkler was evaluated using a simple wetting front detector that automatically switched the water off after the wetting front had reached a prescribed depth in the soil. The detector consists of a funnel-shaped container that is buried in the soil. When a wetting front reaches the detector, the unsaturated flow lines are distorted so that the water content at the base of the funnel reaches saturation. The free water produced is detected electronically and this provides the signal to stop irrigation. The performance of the detector was evaluated over 38 consecutive irrigation events to test the theory that the velocity of a wetting front depends on the difference in water content ahead of and behind the front. The experimental data plotting the irrigation amount permitted by the wetting front detectors as a function of the soil water content before and after irrigation yielded a linear relationship with a slope of 0.95 and a correlation coefficient of 0.73. Thus, if the soil is dry before irrigation the front will move slowly and an irrigation of long duration will be permitted, with the converse applying to wet soil. Independent monitoring of soil water content showed that irrigation was, for the most part, scheduled accurately. Irrigation interval was the key variable to control. When the interval was too short then over irrigation occurred.

Keywords: irrigation scheduling, soil moisture sensors, irrigation interval, irrigation uniformity, soil water content.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012