CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Zoology   
Australian Journal of Zoology
  Evolutionary, Molecular and Comparative Zoology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 Zool. Suppl. Series
All volumes of the Australian Journal of Zoology Supplementary Series are online and available to subscribers of Australian Journal of Zoology.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 51(1)

Comparison of tooth morphology and wear patterns in four species of wallabies

R. G. Lentle, I. D. Hume, K. J. Stafford, M. Kennedy, S. Haslett and B. P. Springett

Australian Journal of Zoology 51(1) 61 - 79

Abstract

Tooth morphology of two browsing macropods (brush-tailed rock-wallabies and swamp wallabies), one grazing species (tammar wallaby) and one mixed feeder (parma wallaby) are compared. The dental action of a single tammar wallaby was studied by cinefluoroscopy. Cinefluoroscopy showed independent rotation of each hemi-jaw on occlusion in the tammar, and the disposition of molar striae suggest a similar pattern of jaw movement in all four species. There was a close relationship between incisor and molar action in both grazing and browsing species. Initial occlusion of the anterior facets of the incisors brought about a grasping action in browsing species and a fine cutting action in grazing species. In both grazing and browsing species these incisor actions were coincident with a cutting action by the transverse lophs during molar occlusion. Subsequent independent rotation of each hemi-jaw results in fine cutting by the lateral facets of the incisors, in both grazers and browsers, at the same time as the molar arrays perform a crushing action in browsers and a secondary cutting action in grazing species. Thus the teeth of the four species showed a number of similarities (independent rotation of each hemi-jaw) along with some differences (incisor and molar actions) that appear to represent adaptations for efficient aquisition and oral processing of browse or graze.



Full text doi:10.1071/ZO01078

© CSIRO 2003

 
PDF (2.7 MB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012