Abstract

The paucity of evidence on eucalypt browsing by common brushtail and common ringtail possums suggests that ringtails preferentially eat foliage from trees within the subgenus Monocalyptus. In contrast, brushtails eat less eucalypt foliage than do ringtails and prefer trees from the subgenus Symphyomyrtus. Trees from these subgenera differ in their defensive chemicals. Both contain tannins but it appears that only the symphyomyrts synthesise formylated phloroglucinol compounds (FPCs). We fed possums foliage from several individual Eucalyptus rossii and E. consideniana, both monocalypts, to avoid the confounding factor of FPCs, and examined the effects of blocking tannins by dipping foliage in polyethylene glycol (PEG). Ringtails and brushtails differed in their abilities to eat foliage from these eucalypts. The ringtails ate much more than did the brushtails and showed a small (about 10%) but significant increase in feeding in response to PEG. The brushtails were reluctant to eat foliage from either eucalypt species but doubled their intake when leaves were coated with PEG. Even so, they still did not eat enough to meet maintenance requirements for energy and nitrogen. Neither ringtails nor brushtails preferred foliage from any individual E. rossii tree, suggesting that all trees were equally defended. However, brushtails preferred foliage from some E. consideniana to others. Monocalypt tannins are clearly important barriers to feeding in brushtail possums, but further research with higher doses of PEG will confirm whether they are the only deterrent chemicals in monocalypt foliage.