CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Zoology   
Australian Journal of Zoology
Journal Banner
  Evolutionary, Molecular and Comparative Zoology
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

red arrow Supplementary Series
blank image
All volumes of the Australian Journal of Zoology Supplementary Series are online and available to subscribers of Australian Journal of Zoology.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 55(6)

Egg size and number is influenced by both environmental and social factors in a facultatively social bee

Pelin Kayaalp A B, Michael P. Schwarz A

A Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: pelin.kayaalp@flinders.edu.au
 
PDF (345 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Social factors influencing the trade-off between egg size and number have been almost entirely neglected in studies of social insects. We examined egg size and number in an Australian allodapine bee where nutritional resource availability and social competition during egg laying vary over colony development. We hypothesised that during August queens should lay many eggs to provide work incentives for subordinates, but because resources are strongly limited these eggs will be small. In spring, resources are less limited but some subordinates also lay eggs, resulting in competition between offspring for communally provided food. Here, we hypothesised that females should attempt to direct resources preferentially to their own offspring by laying large eggs. We analysed egg numbers and weights as functions of colony size. We found that a trade-off existed in August nests but that egg size increased with egg number in October. In November, when larval eclosion was commencing, colonies with larvae had smaller mean egg weights than those with only eggs, suggesting that resources are directed away from oviposition towards larval provisioning. Our analyses suggest that egg size is a function of egg number, rather than colony size per se.

   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013