Body size and trophic divergence of two large sympatric elapid snakes (Notechis scutatus and Austrelaps superbus) (Serpentes:Elapidae) in Tasmania

Article

<< Previous

Next >>

Contents Vol 60(3)

doi:10.1071/ZO12004

Evolutionary, Molecular and Comparative Zoology

	Search




	Advanced Search



	Journal Home

	About the Journal

	Editorial Board

	Contacts



	Content

	Online Early

	Current Issue

	Just Accepted

	All Issues

	Special Issues

	Sample Issue



	For Authors

	General Information

	Notice to Authors

	Submit Article

	Open Access



	For Referees

	Referee Guidelines

	Review Article

	Annual Referee Index



	For Subscribers

	Subscription Prices

	Customer Service

e-Alerts

Subscribe to our Email Alert or

feeds for the latest journal papers.

Connect with us

Supplementary Series

All volumes of the Australian Journal of Zoology Supplementary Series are online and available to subscribers of Australian Journal of Zoology.

Body size and trophic divergence of two large sympatric elapid snakes (Notechis scutatus and Austrelaps superbus) (Serpentes : Elapidae) in Tasmania

S. Fearn ^A, J. Dowde ^A and D. F. Trembath ^B ^C

^A Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Level 1, 167 Westbury Road, Prospect, Tas. 7250, Australia.
^B Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, GPO Box 4646, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia.
^C Corresponding author. Email: dane.trembath@nt.gov.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 60(3) 159-165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ZO12004
Submitted: 14 January 2012 Accepted: 15 August 2012 Published: 27 September 2012





	PDF (311 KB) $25



	Export Citation

Print

Abstract

Tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus) and lowland copperheads (Austrelaps superbus) are both large viviparous elapid snakes confined to the cooler, mesic regions of southern Australia. In spite of both species being common and widespread in the island state of Tasmania, no quantified studies on the trophic ecology of these two snakes from the main island has been published. During a two-year period we collected field data from 127 adult A. superbus and 74 adult N. scutatus from throughout eastern Tasmania. For both species, males were larger than females with respect to all measured parameters, including mass and head size. Reproduction in females was strongly seasonal and clutch size was not related to maternal body size. N. scutatus has a larger head than A. superbus and consequently ingests both small and large prey. N. scutatus in our study displayed the most catholic diet of any Australian elapid studied to date and consumed mammals (possum, bandicoot, antechinus, rats, mice), birds (fairy wrens), fish (eel, trout) and frogs. A. superbus shows a more specialist diet of large volumes of predominately ectothermic prey (frogs, lizards, snakes) even at maximal sizes and was more likely to contain ingested prey than specimens of N. scutatus. Distinctive rodent bite scars were common on N. scutatus but rare on A. superbus. The high frequency of rodent bite scars on N. scutatus further supports our findings of a primarily endothermic diet for mature specimens. We suggest that significant differences in head size, and hence diet, as well as a taxonomically diverse suite of potential prey in Tasmania allow both these large snakes to coexist in sympatry and avoid interspecific competitive exclusion.

References

Aubret, F., and Shine, R. (2007). Rapid prey-induced shift in body size in an isolated snake population (Notechis scutatus, Elapidae). Austral Ecology 32, 889–899.
| CrossRef |

Aubret, F., Shine, R., and Bonnet, X. (2004). Adaptive developmental plasticity in snakes: genes and environment stretch snake jaws to meet the demand of prey size. Nature 431, 261–262.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Bonnet, X., Shine, R., Naulleau, G., and Vacher-Vallas, M. (1998). Sexual dimorphism in snakes: different reproductive roles favour different body plans. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 265, 179–183.
| CrossRef |

Bonnet, X., Lorioux, S., Pearson, D., Aubret, F., Bradshaw, D., Delmas, V., and Fauvel, T. (2011). Which proximate factor determines sexual size dimorphism in tiger snakes? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 103, 668–680.
| CrossRef |

Brothers, N., Pemberton, D., Pryor, H., and Halley, V. (2001). ‘Tasmania’s Offshore Islands: Sea Birds and Other Natural Features.’ (Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery: Hobart.)

Cashion, T. (1959). Preliminary notes on Notechis scutatus niger, Kinghorn, on cat island, Furneaux Group, Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 93, 111–112.

Cogger, H. G. (1986). Comments on the biogeography of the elapid snakes of south eastern Australia. In ‘Snakes: Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia’. (Ed. R. Longmore.) pp. 16–19. (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)

Dredge, P. D. (1981). Ecology and feeding behaviour of the Tasmanian tiger snake, Notechis ater humphreysi. B.Sc.(Honours) Thesis. University of Tasmania, Hobart.

Fearn, S. (1988). Predation on introduced animals by the Tasmanian tiger snake. The Tasmanian Naturalist , 3–4.

Fearn, S. (1993). The tiger snake Notechis scutatus (Serpentes: Elapidae) in Tasmania. Herpetofauna 23, 17–29.

Fearn, S. (1994). Some observations on the ecology of the copperhead Austrelaps superbus (Serpentes: Elapidae) in Tasmania. Herpetofauna 24, 1–10.

Fearn, S. (2011). A rich and varied canvas: scale variations and scarring on Tasmanian tiger snakes Notechis scutatus (Serpentes: Elapidae). The Tasmanian Naturalist 133, 8–14.

Fearn, S., and Munday, B. (1996). Further evidence of orthopteran invertebrates as regular prey for the lowlands copperhead Austrelaps superbus (Serpentes: Elapidae) in Tasmania. Herpetofauna 26, 6–7.

Fearn, S., and Spencer, C. P. (1995). New prey records and relationships for the tiger snake Notechis scutatus (Serpentes: Elapidae) in Tasmania. Herpetofauna 25, 23–27.

Fearn, S., and Staubmann, M. (2001). A record of intraspecific combat in free ranging Tasmanian tiger snakes Notechis scutatus (Serpentes: Elapidae). Herpetofauna 31, 69–71.

Keogh, J. S., Scott, I. A. W., and Hayes, C. (2005). Rapid and repeated origin of insular gigantism and dwarfism in Australian tiger snakes. Evolution 59, 226–233.

Luiselli, L. (2006). Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in snakes: the search for general geographical and guild patterns. Oikos 114, 193–211.
| CrossRef |

Nix, H. (1986). A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes. In ‘Snakes: Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia’. (Ed. R. Longmore.) pp. 4–16. (Australian Government Publishing Service Canberra.)

Oliver, W., Searle, C., and Fearn, S. (2010). Predation on ring-tailed possums (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) by tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus) (Serpentes: Elapidae) in south west Tasmania. Herpetofauna 40, 119–122.

Pearson, D., Shine, R., Bonnet, X., Williams, A., Jennings, B., and Lourdais, O. (2001). Ecological notes on crowned snakes Elapognathus coronatus from the Archipelago of the Recherce in southwestern Australia. Australian Zoologist 31, 610–617.

Rawlinson, P. A. (1991). The taxonomy of the Australian tiger snakes (Notechis) and copperheads (Austrelaps) (Serpentes: Elapidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 103, 125–135.

Schwaner, T. D. (1985a). ‘Snakes in South Australia: a Species List and Overview.’ (South Australian Museum: Adelaide.)

Schwaner, T. D. (1985b). Population structure of black tiger snakes, Notechis ater niger, on offshore islands of South Australia. In ‘Biology of Australasian Frogs and Reptiles’. (Eds G. Grigg, R. Shine, and H. Ehmann.) pp. 35–46. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Schwaner, T. D., and Sarre, S. D. (1988). Body size of tiger snakes in southern Australia with particular reference to Notechis ater serventyi (Elapidae) on Chappell Island. Journal of Herpetology 22, 24–33.
| CrossRef |

Schwaner, T. D., and Sarre, S. D. (1990). Body size and sexual dimorphism in mainland and island tiger snakes. Journal of Herpetology 24, 320–322.
| CrossRef |

Seigel, R. A., and Ford, N. B. (1987). Reproductive ecology. In ‘Snakes: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology’. (Eds R. A. Seigel, J. T. Collins and S. S. Novak.) pp. 210–252. (Macmillan: New York.)

Shine, R. (1977a). Habitats, diets and sympatry in snakes: a study from Australia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 55, 1118–1128.
| CrossRef |

Shine, R. (1977b). Reproduction in Australian elapid snakes. II. Female reproductive cycles. Australian Journal of Zoology 25, 655–666.
| CrossRef |

Shine, R. (1981). Venomous snakes in cold climates: ecology of the Australian genus Drysdalia (Serpentes: Elapidae). Copeia , 14–25.
| CrossRef |

Shine, R. (1987a). Ecological comparisons of island and mainland populations of Australian tiger snakes (Notechis: Elapidae). Herpetologica 43, 233–240.

Shine, R. (1987b). Ecological ramifications of prey size: food habits and reproductive biology of Australian copperhead snakes (Austrelaps, Elapidae). Journal of Herpetology 21, 21–28.
| CrossRef |

Shine, R. (1991). ‘Australian Snakes: a Natural History.’ (Reed Books: Sydney.)

Shine, R. (1994). Sexual size dimorphism in snakes revisited. Copeia 1994, 326–346.
| CrossRef |

Storr, G. M., Smith, L. A. and Johnstone, R. E. (1986). ‘Snakes of Western Australia.’ (Western Australian Museum: Perth.)

Sutherland, S. K., and Tibballs, J. (2001). ‘Australian Animal Toxins: the Creatures, their Toxins and Care of the Poisoned Patient.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Trembath, D. F., Fearn, S., and Undheim, E. (2009). Natural history of the slaty grey snake (Stegonotus cucullatus) from tropical north Queensland, Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 57, 119–124.
| CrossRef |

Van Dyck, S., and Strahan, R. (Eds) (2008). ‘The mammals of Australia. Third Edition’. (Reed New Holland: Sydney)

Watts, D. (2008). ‘Tasmanian Mammals: a Field Guide.’ (Pelican Press: Kettering, Tasmania.)

Wilson, S., and Swan, G. (2010). ‘A Complete Guide to Reptiles of Australia.’ 3rd edn. (New Holland Publishers: Sydney.)

Subscriber Login

	Username: Password:

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help