CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Emu   
Emu
  The Journal of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists´ Union
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Rowley Reviews
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Rowley Reviews

Critical insights to key topics for ornithologists worldwide. More...


 Complete Archive
To celebrate the launch of the complete digital archive of Emu, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely online.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 102(2)

An evaluation of the use of regurgitated pellets and skeletal material to quantify the diet of Wedge-tailed Eagles, Aquila audax

A. Sharp, L. Gibson, M. Norton, A. Marks, B. Ryan and L. Semeraro

Emu 102(2) 181 - 185

Abstract

Analyses of prey remains and regurgitated pellets from nesting sites are often used to document the dietary habits of raptors and, in many studies, the results of both techniques are combined. The current study presents a comparison of the proportional contribution of prey species found in prey remains and pellet samples collected from Wedge-tailed Eagle, Aquila Audax, nests in far western New South Wales. The contribution of most prey classes was found to be comparable between samples; however, some significant discrepancies were observed. Rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus, and reptiles were found in significantly lower proportions within the pellet sample than the prey remains sample, while a combined class comprising Goats, Capra hircus, and Sheep, Ovis aries, represented a significantly higher proportion of the pellet sample. Similar discrepancies have been reported in other studies of raptor diet and can be attributed to size differences between prey species, differential digestibility, the regurgitation of pellets away from the nest and differences in the handling and consumption of prey. These results suggest that the combination of prey remains and pellet samples may result in a biased representation of raptor diet and that the results of each analysis should be reported separately. Further bias is introduced by the high probability that double counting of prey items occurs. While the observed discrepancies may appear inconsequential in some cases (e.g. Rabbits), the subsequent use of such data in ecological models (eg predator-prey models) may produce misleading results.



Full text doi:10.1071/MU00049

© CSIRO 2002

 
PDF (100 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012