CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Emu   
Emu
  The Journal of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists´ Union
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Rowley Reviews
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Rowley Reviews

Critical insights to key topics for ornithologists worldwide. More...


 Complete Archive
To celebrate the launch of the complete digital archive of Emu, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely online.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 102(2)

Tests of disperser specificity between frugivorous birds and rainforest fruits in New Guinea

E. D. Brown and M. J. G. Hopkins

Emu 102(2) 137 - 146

Abstract

Interactions between frugivorous birds and their food plants were studied in tropical lowland hill forest in Papua New Guinea. Over a 2-year period we made intensive observations at 20 fruiting tree species in order to determine avian feeding assemblages at each species. In all, 38 bird species took fruit during observations, mainly in the families Paradisaeidae, Columbidae, Meliphagidae, Campephagidae, Dicaeidae, Zosteropidae, and Pachycephalidae. We tested specificity of bird-plant interactions by examining various statistical associations between bird and plant characteristics to identify key factors in consistent patterns of fruit consumption, if any. Bird families were significantly associated with different types of fruits: cuckoo-shrikes, thickheads and honeyeaters visited figs more often than expected, and birds of paradise and white-eyes visited arillate fruits more often than expected. In other tests, number of visits to very small fruits 5-6.5 mm in diameter (which included several fig species) was correlated with birds ranked by size, especially for berrypeckers, flowerpeckers and white-eyes. However, for both smaller and larger fruits, or for fruits of different structure or accessibility, there was no correlation with bird size. Fruit size showed no correlation with avian food-handling behaviour, or with avian taxonomic affinity. Size of fruiting display was not correlated with either avian residency or nomadism. Our study provided an overview of most of the avian frugivore species at the study site, which fed at a wide array of fruiting plants, and thus our results give an indication of whether patterns in bird-plant relationships are discernible at the level of species, family or guild, or other ecological subset, and whether determining factors might be morphology, size, bird behaviour, etc. These results also provide a broader context within which other regional studies of bird-plant relationships can be interpreted, and were consistent with some, but not all, of the conclusions of previous studies that suggested specialised relationships between Australo-Papuan birds and fruiting plants.



Full text doi:10.1071/MU00082

© CSIRO 2002

 
PDF (229 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012