CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Emu   
Emu
  The Journal of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists´ Union
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Rowley Reviews
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Rowley Reviews

Critical insights to key topics for ornithologists worldwide. More...


 Complete Archive
To celebrate the launch of the complete digital archive of Emu, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely online.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 104(1)

Repertoire size, song sharing and type matching in the Rufous Bristlebird (Dasyornis broadbenti)

Daniel Rogers

Emu 104(1) 7 - 13

Abstract

A strong pattern has emerged between sedentary behaviour and song sharing between territorial neighbours for avian species that possess song repertoires. This paper investigates song-repertoire size, and rates of song sharing and type matching, in the Rufous Bristlebird (Dasyornis broadbenti), a southern Australian species for which there is strong evidence for sedentary and territorial behaviour. For 12 focal individuals (6 male, 6 female), estimated mean repertoire size was 31 song types for male birds, and 14 song types for females, recorded at the start of the breeding season. While the female song was similar in structure to the final phase of the male song, there was no sharing of song types between the sexes. A high degree of song sharing was exhibited in both sexes, with males sharing an average of 65% of song types, and females sharing 59% of song types, with immediate territorial neighbours. These rates of song sharing between neighbours were significantly greater than rates of song sharing between non-neighbouring individuals, although common song types between non-neighbours were encountered. Furthermore, bristlebirds used these common song types significantly more often than song types that were unique to their repertoires. While male neighbours preferentially matched song types, there was no evidence for repertoire matching. The degree of song sharing in neighbouring Rufous Bristlebirds is therefore consistent with the observed relationship between sedentary behaviour and high levels of song sharing.



Full text doi:10.1071/MU01070

© CSIRO 2004

 
PDF (94 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012