CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Emu
  Publication of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union
You are here: Journals > Emu   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editor
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Awards and Prizes
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

The prevalence and intensity of tick infestation in passerines from South Australia

Margot Oorebeek A and Sonia Kleindorfer A B

A School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: sonia.kleindorfer@flinders.edu.au


Abstract

Ticks are a major vector of disease, so understanding their distribution, geographically and across hosts, is important for the study of evolutionary ecology. Numerous passerine species worldwide are infested with ticks, and both prevalence and intensity of ticks vary across host species. In bird studies, foraging height is commonly thought to explain the difference in prevalence and intensity of ticks, with ground-foraging birds having a greater chance of encountering a tick. In this study, we used phylogenetically independent contrasts to examine the prevalence and intensity of ticks on passerines in South Australia and the role of abundance, body size and host foraging height for differences in prevalence and intensity of ticks. We examined 1262 birds for ticks between April 2004 and December 2006 at five sites across South Australia. All the ticks we collected were immature life-stages of Ixodes hirsti. Of the mist-netted birds, 347 (27.5%) individuals were infested with an average of 2.8 ticks. Both prevalence and intensity of ticks varied significantly between host species. We found that body size was significantly correlated with tick prevalence, with larger hosts having higher tick prevalence. Abundance and mean foraging height did not explain the variance in prevalence or intensity of ticks.

Emu 109(2) 121–125    doi:10.1071/MU08052
Submitted: 3 October 2008    Accepted: 2 February 2009    Published: 2 June 2009





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (166 KB) $25
Export Citation
Cited by
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010