Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Public hospital bed crisis: too few or too misused?

Ian A. Scott
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia. Email: ian_scott@health.qld.gov.au

Australian Health Review 34(3) 317-324 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH09821
Submitted: 10 August 2009  Accepted: 26 November 2009   Published: 25 August 2010

Abstract

• Increasing demand on public hospital beds has led to what many see as a hospital bed crisis requiring substantial increases in bed numbers. By 2050, if current bed use trends persist and as the numbers of frail older patients rise exponentially, a 62% increase in hospital beds will be required to meet expected demand, at a cost almost equal to the entire current Australian healthcare budget.

• This article provides an overview of the effectiveness of different strategies for reducing hospital demand that may be viewed as primarily (although not exclusively) targeting the hospital sector – increasing capacity and throughput and reducing readmissions – or the non-hospital sector – facilitating early discharge or reducing presentations and admissions to hospital. Evidence of effectiveness was retrieved from a literature search of randomised trials and observational studies using broad search terms.

• The principal findings were as follows: (1) within the hospital sector, throughput could be substantially improved by outsourcing public hospital clinical services to the private sector, undertaking whole-of-hospital reform of care processes and patient flow that address both access and exit block, separating acute from elective beds and services, increasing rates of day-only or short stay admissions, and curtailing ineffective or marginally effective clinical interventions; (2) in regards to the non-hospital sector, potentially the biggest gains in reducing hospital demand will come from improved access to residential care, rehabilitation services, and domiciliary support as patients awaiting such services currently account for 70% of acute hospital bed-days. More widespread use of acute care and advance care planning within residential care facilities and population-based chronic disease management programs can also assist.

• This overview concludes that, in reducing hospital bed demand, clinical process redesign within hospitals and capacity enhancement of non-hospital care services and chronic disease management programs are effective strategies that should be considered before investing heavily in creating additional hospital beds devoid of any critical reappraisal of current models of care.

What is known about the topic? There is a growing demand for inpatient care in Australia, with presentations to public hospital emergency departments increasing by 4.9% per year over the last 5 years and admission numbers increasing by 3.6% per year. Increasing numbers of hospital beds may give only short-term reprieve in lowering bed occupancy rates if little attention is giving to improving hospital efficiency by internal process redesign or by decreasing demand for acute hospital beds by improving capacity of the non-hospital sector to manage sub-acute illness and chronic disease.

What does this paper add? This article provides a narrative meta-review of the evidence of effectiveness of various reform strategies. The key findings are that, within the hospital sector, patient throughput could be substantially improved by: outsourcing public hospital clinical services to the private sector where appropriate; implementing whole-of-hospital reforms, which that facilitate more flexible and dynamic bed management (especially where it relates to systems of care for acutely ill patients); separating acute from elective beds and services; increasing the numbers of day-only admissions; and curtailing ineffective or marginally effective clinical interventions. However, the potentially biggest gains in hospital productivity will come from improved access to residential care, rehabilitation services and domiciliary support for hospitalised patients who no longer require acute inpatient care, combined with decreased need for hospitalisation as a result of population-based chronic disease management programs led by primary care agencies, and acute care and advance care planning within residential care facilities.

What are the implications for practitioners? A public debate must start now on how the healthcare system and the role within it of hospitals should be re-configured in managing future population healthcare needs in a sustainable way. In the meantime, all hospitals must consider implementing reforms with potential to improve their productivity and reduce access block for those who really need acute hospital care.


Acknowledgement

The author thanks Professor Peter Cameron for his review of a previous draft, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.


References


[1] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian hospital statistics 2007–08. Health services series No. 33. Cat. No. HSE 71. Canberra: AIHW; 2009.

[2] Australian Medical Association. Public hospital report card 2008. An AMA analysis of the Australian public hospital system. AMA: Canberra, 2008. Available at www.ama.com.au/node/4232 [verified 17 July 2009].

[3] Schofield DJ,  Earnest A. Demographic change and the future demand for public hospital care in Australia, 2005–2050. Aust Health Rev 2006; 30 507–15.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified 16 July 2009].

[5] National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. A Healthier Future For All Australians – Final Report of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.

[6] Productivity Commission. Potential Benefits of the National Reform Agenda. Report to the Council of Australian Governments. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2006.

[7] Willcox S,  Seddon M,  Dunn S, et al. Measuring and reducing waiting times: a cross-national comparison of strategies – setting targets and national/state commitment are important to reduce surgical waiting times. Health Aff 2007; 26 1078–87.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [verified 29 July 2010].

[33] Gurusamy KS,  Junnarkar S,  Farouk M,  Davidson BR. Day-case versus overnight stay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;: CD006798.
[verified 17 July 2009].

[50] Metropolitan Health and Aged Care Services Division. Better faster emergency care. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Human Services, 2007. Available at www.health.vic.gov.au/emergency/better-faster-report07.pdf [verified 7 July 2009].

[51] Hammond CL,  Pinnington LL,  Phillips MF. A qualitative examination of inappropriate hospital admissions and lengths of stay. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9 44–52.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[52] Page A , Ambrose S , Glover J , Hetzel D . Atlas of Avoidable Hospitalisations in Australia: Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions. Adelaide: PHIDU, University of Adelaide; 2007.

[53] Parchman ML,  Culler S. Primary care physicians and avoidable hospitalisations. J Fam Pract 1994; 39 123–8.
PubMed |

[54] McAlister FA,  Stewart S,  Ferrua S,  McMurray JV. Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44 810–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[55] Puhan M,  Scharplatz M,  Troosters T, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;: CD005305.
PubMed |

[56] Lauterbach K . Population-based Disease Management Programs in the German Health Care System . Presented at The Commonwealth Fund 2007 International Symposium on Health Care Policy, Washington DC, 1 November 2007.

[57] Gruen RL,  Weeramanthri TS,  Knight SE,  Bailie RS. Specialist outreach clinics in primary care and rural hospital settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;: CD003798.
PubMed |

[58] Hartigan PA,  Soo TM,  Kljakovic M. Do Team Care Arrangements address the real issues in the management of chronic disease? Med J Aust 2009; 191 99–100.
PubMed |

[59] Campbell SM,  Reeves D,  Kontopantelis E,  Sibbald B,  Roland M. Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 368–78.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[60] Fletcher AE,  Price GM,  Ng ESW, et al. Population-based multidimensional assessment of older people in UK general practice: a cluster-randomised factorial trial. Lancet 2004; 364 1667–77.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[61] Ploeg J,  Feightner J,  Hutchison B, et al. Effectiveness of preventive primary care outreach interventions aimed at older people: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Can Fam Physician 2005; 51 1244–5.
PubMed |

[62] Gates S,  Fisher JD,  Cooke MW, et al. Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008; 336 130–3.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[63] McCusker J,  Verdon J. Do geriatric interventions reduce emergency department visits? A systematic review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006; 61 53–62.
PubMed |

[64] Forster A,  Young J,  Lambley R,  Langhorne P. Medical day hospital care for the elderly versus alternative forms of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;: CD001730.
PubMed |

[65] Bouman A,  van Rossum E,  Nelemans P, et al. Effects of intensive home visiting programs for older people with poor health status: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8 74–85.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[66] Holland R,  Lenaghan E,  Harvey I, et al. Does home based medication review keep older people out of hospital? The HOMER randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005; 330 293.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[67] Royal S,  Smeaton L,  Avery AJ, et al. Interventions in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events and hospital admissions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15 23–31.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[68] Barlow J,  Singh D,  Bayer S,  Curry R. A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare 2007; 13 172–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[69] Tran A,  Taylor DMcD. Medical model for hospital in the home: effects on patient management. Aust Health Rev 2009; 33 494–501.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[70] Ong BS,  Karr MA,  Chan DK, et al. Management of pulmonary embolism in the home. Med J Aust 2005; 183 239–42.
PubMed |

[71] Shepperd S,  Doll H,  Angus RM, et al. Admission avoidance hospital at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;: CD007491.
PubMed |

[72] Shepperd S,  Doll H,  Broad J, et al. Early discharge hospital at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;: CD000356.
PubMed |

[73] Finn JC,  Flicker L,  Mackenzie E, et al. Interface between residential aged care facilities and a teaching hospital emergency department in Western Australia. Med J Aust 2006; 184 432–5.
PubMed |

[74] Loeb M,  Carusone SC,  Goeree R, et al. Effect of a clinical pathway to reduce hospitalizations in nursing home residents with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006; 295 2503–10.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[75] Kane RL,  Homyak P,  Bershadsky B, et al. Patterns of utilization for the Minnesota senior health options program. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52 2039–44.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[76] Molloy DW,  Guyatt GH,  Russo R, et al. Systematic implementation of an advance directive program in nursing homes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2000; 283 1437–44.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[77] Levy C,  Morris M,  Kramer A. Improving end-of-life outcomes in nursing homes by targeting residents at high-risk of mortality for palliative care: program description and evaluation. J Palliat Med 2008; 11 217–25.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[78] Badger F,  Clifford C,  Hewison A,  Thomas K. An evaluation of the implementation of a programme to improve end-of-life care in nursing homes. Palliat Med 2009; 23 502–11.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[79] Mitchell SL,  Teno JM,  Kiely DK, et al. The clinical course of advanced dementia. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 1529–38.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |