Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A systems life cycle approach to managing the radiology profession: an Australian perspective

Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba A D , Simon Reay Atkinson A , Sarah Lewis B , Kon Shing Kenneth Chung A and Liaquat Hossain A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Complex Systems Research Group, School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email: simon.reayatkinson@sydney.edu.au; ken.chung@sydney.edu.au

B Medical Imaging Optimisation and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Faculty of Health Sciences, Brain Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia. Email: sarah.lewis@sydney.edu.au

C Division of Information and Technology Studies, RM113, Runme Shaw Building, Pokfulam Road, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Email: lhossain@hku.hk

D Corresponding author. Email: amir.tavakoli@sydney.edu.au

Australian Health Review 39(2) 228-239 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14113
Submitted: 30 July 2014  Accepted: 6 October 2014   Published: 17 December 2014

Abstract

Objective Although the medical system has expanded considerably over the past two decades in almost all countries, so too has the demand for health care. The radiology specialisation may be an early system indicator, being especially sensitive to changes in supply and demand in both rural and urban environments. The question is whether the new policies of increasing the number of radiologists can be a proper long-term solution for the imbalance of workforce supply and demand or not.

Methods Using system dynamics modelling, we present our integrated descriptive models for the supply and demand of Australian radiologists to find the actual gap. Followed by this, we pose a prescriptive model for the supply in order to lessen the identified imbalance between supply and demand. Our system dynamics models compare the demand and supply of Australian radiologists over 40 years between 2010 and 2050.

Results The descriptive model shows that even if the radiology training program grows at a higher rate than the medical training growth rate and its own historical growth, the system will never be able to meet demand. The prescriptive model also indicates that although changing some influential factors (e.g the intake rate) reduces the level of imbalance, the system will still stay unstable during the study period.

Conclusion We posit that Australia may need to design a new system of radiology provision to meet future demands for high-quality medical radiation services. We also suggest some strategies, such as greater development of radiographers’ role, are critical for enabling sustainable change over time.

What is known about the topic? Long-term workforce planning for medical services at the national level has been very challenging for policy makers of the 21st century. The current demographic imbalance in the supply and demand of the Australian radiologist workforce makes it difficult to plan the effects of extra inflow of radiology students over time.

What does this paper add? This paper discovers the current situation facing the Australian Radiology profession and identifies all the factors that influence the long-term matching of radiologist workforce supply and demand. This Australian case study adds to the current literature of medical workforce planning and its challenges. Moreover, this paper answers how the problem of workforce imbalance can be solved through a sustainable change over time.

What are the implications for practitioners? Conventional responses in Australia and many developed countries in response to radiological services demand have been to increase the number of radiologists. However, our models and analyses show that this is not an all-inclusive long-term solution: merely increasing the number of radiologists will not result in a balance between supply and demand.


References

[1]  Getzen TE. Health care is an individual necessity and a national luxury: applying multilevel decision models to the analysis of health care expenditures. J Health Econ 2000; 19 259–70.
Health care is an individual necessity and a national luxury: applying multilevel decision models to the analysis of health care expenditures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FgsVGlsQ%3D%3D&md5=bf8484b2f3e70569732dec063380f3fbCAS | 10947579PubMed |

[2]  The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR). 2010 RANZCR radiology workforce report. Canberra: RANZCR; 2011.

[3]  Health Workforce Australia. Health workforce 2025, volume 3, medical specialties; 2012 Available at: http://www.hwa.gov.au/sites/uploads/HW2025_V3_FinalReport20121109.pdf [verified November 2014].

[4]  Zurn P, Dal Poz MR, Stilwell B, Adams O. Imbalance in the health workforce. Hum Resour Health 2004; 2 13
Imbalance in the health workforce.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15377382PubMed |

[5]  Bloor K, Hendry V, Maynard A. Do we need more doctors? J R Soc Med 2006; 99 281–7.
Do we need more doctors?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16738369PubMed |

[6]  Maynard A. Medical workforce planning: some forecasting challenges. Aust Econ Rev 2006; 39 323–9.
Medical workforce planning: some forecasting challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Schneider M-J. Introduction to public health. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2014.

[8]  Australia HW. National cancer workforce strategy. Cancer workforce planning data inventory; 2011. Available at: http://www.hwa.gov.au/sites/uploads/NCWS-Planning-Data-Inventory.pdf [verified November 2014].

[9]  Ljung L. System identification. Wiley Online Library; 1999. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/047134608X.W1046/abstract [verified November 2014].

[10]  Kim S, Aurisicchio M, Wallace K. Towards automatic causality boundary identification from root cause analysis reports. J Intell Manuf 2009; 20 581–91.
Towards automatic causality boundary identification from root cause analysis reports.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  D’Aveni R. Hypercompetition: managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: The Free Press; 1994.

[12]  Australia M. Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS). Medicare, Australian Government, Department of Health; 2014. Available at: http://www.healthgovau/internet/mbsonline/publishingnsf/Content/Downloads-201401 [verified 20 September 2014].

[13]  Randolph DS. Predicting the effect of extrinsic and intrinsic job satisfaction factors on recruitment and retention of rehabilitation professionals. J Healthc Manag 2005; 50 49
| 15729907PubMed |

[14]  Daniels ZM, VanLeit BJ, Skipper BJ, Sanders ML, Rhyne RL. Factors in recruiting and retaining health professionals for rural practice. J Rural Health 2007; 23 62–71.
Factors in recruiting and retaining health professionals for rural practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17300480PubMed |

[15]  Garrison G, Mikesell C, Matthew D. Medical school graduation and attrition rates. Analysis Brief 2007; 7 2 Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/102346/data/aibvol7no2.pdf. [verified 20 November 2014].

[16]  Hayek FA. The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 1945; 35 519–30.

[17]  Dreyfus H, Dreyfus SE. Mind over machine. New York: The Free Press; 2000.

[18]  Brooks PM, Lapsley HM, Butt DB. Medical workforce issues in Australia: tomorrow’s doctors: too few, too far. Med J Aust 2003; 179 206–8.
| 12914512PubMed |

[19]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Health and community services labour force. National health labour force series. Number 42. Catalogue no. HWL 43; 2009. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=6442458396 [verified 20 November 2014].

[20]  KPMG. Health workforce in Australia and factors for current shortages. Canberra: KPMG; 2009. Available at: http://www.ahwo.gov.au/documents/NHWT/The%20health%20workforce%20in%20Australia%20and%20factors%20influencing%20current%20shortages.pdf [verified 20 November 2014].

[21]  Becker GJ. 2000 RSNA annual oration in diagnostic radiology: the future of interventional radiology. Radiology 2001; 220 281–92.
2000 RSNA annual oration in diagnostic radiology: the future of interventional radiology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvivFSgsQ%3D%3D&md5=d2ac7889d11fe352a36d1753cc110561CAS | 11477226PubMed |

[22]  Pitman A, Jones D. Radiologist workloads in teaching hospital departments: measuring the workload. Australas Radiol 2006; 50 12–20.
Radiologist workloads in teaching hospital departments: measuring the workload.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD287ht12muw%3D%3D&md5=58ee0683fe9bc811801fe258ecb66621CAS | 16499721PubMed |

[23]  Nakajima Y, Yamada K, Imamura K, Kobayashi K. Radiologist supply and workload: international comparison. Radiat Med 2008; 26 455–65.
Radiologist supply and workload: international comparison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18975046PubMed |

[24]  Jones N. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) radiology workforce survey 2000. Sydney: RANZCR; 2000.

[25]  Forrester JW. Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for decision makers. Harv Bus Rev 1958; 36 37–66.

[26]  Richardson GP. Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 2011; 27 219–43.
Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  Forrester JW. Urban dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1969.

[28]  Wolstenholme EF. System enquiry: a system dynamics approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.

[29]  Forrester JW. Industrial dynamics. J Oper Res Soc 1997; 48 1037–41.
Industrial dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  Angerhofer BJ, Angelides MC. System dynamics modelling in supply chain management: research review. Simulation Conference, 2000. Proceedings. Winter, vol.1, no., pp.342–351 vol.1, 2000. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=899737&tag=1 [verified 20 November 2014]. 10.1109/WSC.2000.899737

[31]  Sterman JD. System dynamics modeling: tools for learning in a complex world. Calif Manage Rev 2001; 43 8–25.
System dynamics modeling: tools for learning in a complex world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Rodrigues A, Bowers J. The role of system dynamics in project management. Int J Proj Manag 1996; 14 213–20.
The role of system dynamics in project management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[33]  Brailsford SC, Desai SM, Viana J, editors. Towards the holy grail: combining system dynamics and discrete-event simulation in healthcare. Proceedings of the Simulation Conference, 2000; IEEE; 2010.

[34]  Brailsford SC, Evandrou M, Luff R, Shaw R, Viana J, Vlachantoni A, Willis RM . Using system dynamics to model the social care system: simulation modeling as the catalyst in linking demography to care delivery. Simulation Conference, 2000. Proceedings. Winter, vol.1, no., pp.342–351 vol.1, 2000. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=899737&tag=1 [verified 20 November 2014]. 10.1109/WSC.2000.899737

[35]  Samuel C, Gonapa K, Chaudhary P, Mishra A. Supply chain dynamics in healthcare services. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2010; 23 631–42.
Supply chain dynamics in healthcare services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21125959PubMed |

[36]  Brailsford SC, Silverman E, Rossiter S, Bijak J, Shaw RJ, Viana J, Noble J, Efsathiou S, Vlachantoni A.. Complex systems modeling for supply and demand in health and social care.Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2011 Winter , vol., no., pp.1125–1136, 11–14 Dec. 2011. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6147835&isnumber=6147014. 10.1109/WSC.2011.6147835

[37]  Australian Bureau of Statistics 2012, Year Book Australia, 2012, cat. no. 1301.0, ABS, Canberra. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1301.0~2012~Main%20Features~Population%20size%20and%20growth~47

[38]  Productivity Commission. Economic implications of an ageing Australia. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2005.

[39]  Productivity Commission. Australia’s health workforce. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2005.

[40]  Studdert DM, Mello MM, Brennan TA. Defensive medicine and tort reform: a wide view. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25 380–1.
Defensive medicine and tort reform: a wide view.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20349156PubMed |

[41]  Meyboom-de Jong B. Feminiscring van de geneeskunde. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143 1134–5.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzgtVChsw%3D%3D&md5=e6d74bdfa02c70c78117cf9b2aaf228cCAS | 10371833PubMed |

[42]  Jones VA. Why aren’t there more women surgeons? JAMA 2000; 283 670
Why aren’t there more women surgeons?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[43]  Phillips SP, Austin EB. The feminization of medicine and population health. JAMA 2009; 301 863–4.
The feminization of medicine and population health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXisV2jtb0%3D&md5=b9d794223ce48ab60542c5e70ec639a0CAS | 19244195PubMed |

[44]  Teljeur C, O’Dowd T. The feminisation of general practice: crisis or business as usual? Lancet 2009; 374 1147
The feminisation of general practice: crisis or business as usual?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19801094PubMed |

[45]  Weizblit N, Noble J, Baerlocher MO. The feminisation of Canadian medicine and its impact upon doctor productivity. Med Educ 2009; 43 442–8.
The feminisation of Canadian medicine and its impact upon doctor productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19422491PubMed |

[46]  Douglas A. The feminization of American culture. New York: Knopf; 1977.

[47]  Ferguson KE. The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1985.

[48]  Fondas N. Feminization unveiled: management qualities in contemporary writings. Acad Manage Rev 1997; 22 257–82.

[49]  Burton KR, Wong IK. A force to contend with: the gender gap closes in Canadian medical schools. CMAJ 2004; 170 1385–6.
A force to contend with: the gender gap closes in Canadian medical schools.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15111465PubMed |

[50]  Barzansky B, Etzel SI. Medical schools in the United States. JAMA 2007; 298 1071–7.
Medical schools in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVaisLrO&md5=1f4af32f5526916b4188f046c3b462a5CAS | 17785656PubMed |

[51]  Gould P. Data show shift toward more women in radiology departments. Diagn Imag Eur 2009; 25 4–5.

[52]  Yelland CE, Yelland ME. Women in medicine: two generations. Med J Aust 2001; 174 52–3
| 11219796PubMed |

[53]  Owen JB, Chan W, Sunshine J, Shaffer K. The sex ratio of American radiologists: comparison and implications by age, subspecialty, and type of practice. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165 1337–41.
The sex ratio of American radiologists: comparison and implications by age, subspecialty, and type of practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fnt1Kksw%3D%3D&md5=3523ec04c631af2b713626ed146abe5eCAS |

[54]  Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Women radiologists in the United States: results from the American College of Radiology’s 2003 survey. Radiology 2007; 242 802–10.
Women radiologists in the United States: results from the American College of Radiology’s 2003 survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17325067PubMed |

[55]  McKinstry B. Are there too many female medical graduates? Yes. BMJ 2008; 336 748
Are there too many female medical graduates? Yes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18390524PubMed |

[56]  Lambert TW, Goldacre MJ, Turner G. Career choices of United Kingdom medical graduates of 1999 and 2000: questionnaire surveys. BMJ 2003; 326 194
Career choices of United Kingdom medical graduates of 1999 and 2000: questionnaire surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12543835PubMed |

[57]  Australian Bureau of Statistics 1999, Labour Force Projections, Australia, 1999 - 2016, cat. no. 6260.0, ABS, Canberra. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/mf/6260.0 [verified 20 November 2014].

[58]  Schofield DJ, Beard JR. Baby boomer doctors and nurses: demographic change and transitions to retirement. Med J Aust 2005; 183 80
| 16022613PubMed |

[59]  Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Workload of radiologists in the United States in 2002–2003 and trends since 1991–19921. Radiology 2005; 236 920–31.
Workload of radiologists in the United States in 2002–2003 and trends since 1991–19921.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16014442PubMed |

[60]  May L, Martino S, McElveny C. The establishment of an advanced clinical role for radiographers in the United States. Radiography 2008; 14 e24–7.
The establishment of an advanced clinical role for radiographers in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[61]  Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH, Schepps B. Too few radiologists? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178 1075–82.
Too few radiologists?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11959704PubMed |

[62]  First Consulting Group. The healthcare workforce shortage and its implications for American hospitals. Long Beach, CA: American Hospital Association; 2001.

[63]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia Health 2008: Section 8 – Expenditure and Workforce. AIHW, Canberra; 2009.

[64]  Smith TN, Baird M. Radiographers’ role in radiological reporting: a model to support future demand. Med J Aust 2007; 186 629–31.
| 17576178PubMed |

[65]  Manning D, Ethell S, Donovan T, Crawford T. How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules. Radiography 2006; 12 134–42.
How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[66]  Brealey S, Piper K, King D, Bland M, Caddick J, Campbell P, Gibbon A, Highland A, Jenkins N, Petty D, Warren D. Observer agreement in the reporting of knee and lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations: selectively trained MR radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82 e597–605.
Observer agreement in the reporting of knee and lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations: selectively trained MR radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3sjkvVGrsw%3D%3D&md5=fd2d4f633e9ebdffddc1045133ee356cCAS | 23791130PubMed |

[67]  Brealey S, Scally A, Hahn S, Thomas N, Godfrey C, Coomarasamy A. Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 2005; 60 232–41.
Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FjslSjtA%3D%3D&md5=96a84cdf2544ac4f02084cb4bbdc1bc6CAS | 15664578PubMed |

[68]  Thompson W, Pollard K. The current status of radiographers as screen readers in breast screening units: applications for Australia. Radiograpgher 2007; 54 16–20.

[69]  Freckelton I. Advanced practice in radiography and radiation therapy: report from the Inter-professional Advisory Team. 2012. Available at: http://www.air.asn.au/cms_files/09_AdvancedPractice/ipat_final_report21april2012.pdf [verified 20 November 2014].

[70]  Brown N, Leschke P.. Evaluating the true clinical utility of the red dot system in radiograph interpretation. J Med Image Radiat Oncol 2012; 56 510–13.
Evaluating the true clinical utility of the red dot system in radiograph interpretation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[71]  Advanced Practice Working Group (APWG). A model of advanced practice in medical imaging and radiation therapy in Australia. Melbourne: APWG; 2009. Available at: http://www.air.asn.au/advanced.php [verified 30 October 2012].

[72]  Smith T, Lewis S. Opportunities for role development for medical imaging practitioners in Australia: part 1. Rationale and potential. Radiographer 2002; 49 161

[73]  Swinburne K. Pattern recognition for radiographers. Lancet 1971; 297 589–90.
Pattern recognition for radiographers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[74]  Davis LE. The coming crisis for production management: technology and organization. Int J Prod Res 1971; 9 65–82.
The coming crisis for production management: technology and organization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[75]  Ōno T. Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Cambridge: Productivity Press; 1988.

[76]  Weick KE. The social psychology of organizing (topics in social psychology series). New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979.

[77]  Modis T. Fractal aspects of natural growth. Technol Forecast Soc Change 1994; 47 63–73.
Fractal aspects of natural growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[78]  Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics; 2008.

[79]  Mintzberg H, Jorgensen J, Dougherty D, Westley F. Some surprising things about collaboration: knowing how people connect makes it work better. Organ Dyn 1996; 25 60–71.
Some surprising things about collaboration: knowing how people connect makes it work better.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[80]  Warren RB, Warren DI. The neighborhood organizer’s handbook. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press; 1977.

[81]  Backman EV, Smith SR. Healthy organizations, unhealthy communities? Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 2000; 10 355–73.
Healthy organizations, unhealthy communities?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[82]  Kim J, Bentley PJ, editors. Immune memory in the dynamic clonal selection algorithm. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems ICARIS; 2002: Citeseer. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a474399.pdf#page=59 [verified 20 November 2014].

[83]  Rawashdeh MA, Lee WB, Bourne RM, Ryan EA, Pietrzyk MW, Reed WM, Heard RC, Black DA, Brennan PC. Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings. Radiology 2013; 269 61–7.
Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23737538PubMed |

[84]  Reed WM, Lee WB, Cawson JN, Brennan PC. Malignancy detection in digital mammograms: important reader characteristics and required case numbers. Acad Radiol 2010; 17 1409–13.
Malignancy detection in digital mammograms: important reader characteristics and required case numbers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20719545PubMed |

[85]  Jerslid S. Radiologist sightings drop round the world. Diagn Imaging (San Franc) 2003; Available at: http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/articles/radiologist-sightings-drop-around-world [verified 20 November 2014].

[86]  Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia. Professional capabilities for medical radiation practice. 2013. Available at: http://www.medicalradiationpracticeboard.gov.au/Registration/Professional-Capabilities.aspx [verifed 20 November 2014].

[87]  Adan I, Vissers J. Patient mix optimisation in hospital admission planning: a case study. Int J Oper Prod Manage 2002; 22 445–61.
Patient mix optimisation in hospital admission planning: a case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[88]  Cayirli T, Veral E. Outpatient scheduling in health care: a review of literature. Prod Oper Manag 2003; 12 519–49.
Outpatient scheduling in health care: a review of literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[89]  Cardoen B, Demeulemeester E, Beliën J. Operating room planning and scheduling: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 2010; 201 921–32.
Operating room planning and scheduling: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[90]  Walter S. A comparison of appointment schedules in a hospital radiology department. Br J Prev Soc Med 1973; 27 160–7.
| 1:STN:280:DyaE2c%2Fkt1equw%3D%3D&md5=f90e2b2a410ab0b6ce5a26ff0eb53a7dCAS | 4757349PubMed |

[91]  Huang Y-L, Marcak J. Radiology scheduling with consideration of patient characteristics to improve patient access to care and medical resource utilization. Health Syst 2013; 2 93–102.