Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

On the right path? Exploring the experiences and opinions of clinicians involved in developing and implementing HealthPathways Barwon

Sarah J. Mansfield A D , Frances Quirk B , Kathryn von Treuer C and Gerard Gill A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Deakin University, Department of General Practice, Deakin University, Department of General Practice, Kardinia Health, 2–18 Colac Road, Belmont, Vic. 3216, Australia. Email: gerard.gill@deakin.edu.au

B Barwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, PO Box 281, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia. Email: frances.quirk@barwonhealth.org.au

C Deakin University, School of Psychology, Burwood campus, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia. Email: kathryn.vontreuer@deakin.edu.au

D Corresponding author. Email: s.mansfield1@gmail.com

Australian Health Review 40(2) 129-135 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15009
Submitted: 20 January 2015  Accepted: 26 October 2015   Published: 22 December 2015

Journal Compilation © AHHA 2016

Abstract

The aims of this paper are to present the findings of a process evaluation exploring the experiences and opinions of clinicians who have been involved in the HealthPathways Barwon clinical workgroups and discuss implications for further development of the program, as well as regional health service initiatives more broadly. HealthPathways Barwon is a web-based program comprising locally agreed-upon evidence-based clinical pathways that assist with assessment, management and region-specific referral for various clinical conditions. Clinical workgroup members participated in focus groups. Coding and thematic analysis were performed and findings were compared with similar evaluations of HealthPathways in other jurisdictions. Five broad themes emerged from the focus group, each with several subthemes: (1) purpose of HealthPathways; (2) workgroup process; (3) barriers and facilitators to HealthPathways use; (4) impact of HealthPathways on clinical practice; and (5) measuring performance. Findings of particular interest were that the perceived drivers for implementation of HealthPathways Barwon are broad, HealthPathways Barwon is viewed positively by clinicians, the workgroup process itself has a positive impact on relationships between primary and secondary care clinicians, existing habits of clinicians are a major barrier to adoption of HealthPathways Barwon, the sustainability of HealthPathways Barwon is a concern and it is difficult to measure the outcomes of HealthPathways. Although HealthPathways Barwon is viewed positively by clinicians and is seen to have the potential to address many issues at the primary–secondary care interface, successful implementation and uptake will depend on buy-in from clinicians, as well as continuous evaluation to inform improved development and implementation. More broadly, health service initiatives like HealthPathways Barwon require longer-term certainty of funding and administration to become established and produce meaningful outcomes.

What is known about this topic? HealthPathways is a program that has been implemented in Canterbury, New Zealand, and several regions in Australia. Early evaluations in these jurisdictions have found that measuring the impact of the program is challenging, and there is little evidence of the program’s influence on health system performance indicators such as waiting times. However they have found some evidence of improved collaboration between primary and secondary care clinicians and improved clinician experience in providing patient care.

What does the paper add? This case study outlines a potential method of evaluation of HealthPathways, as well as some early evidence regarding the experiences of those developing, implementing and using the program in the Barwon region in South-West Victoria.

What are the implications for practitioners? HealthPathways Barwon may impact positively on clinician-clinician relationships and confidence, however getting more clinicians to use the program may require identification of ways to better incorporate HealthPathways use into their existing clinical information sourcing and referral routines. Additionally, HealthPathways Barwon’s future depends on recruitment of more clinicians to develop and update pathways.


References

[1]  Department of Health and Ageing. National primary health care strategic framework. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2013.

[2]  Robinson S, Varhol R, Bell C, Quirk F, Durrington L. HealthPathways: creating a pathway for health systems reform. Aust Health Rev 2014; 39 9–11.
HealthPathways: creating a pathway for health systems reform.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Petrich M, Ramamurthy V, Hendrie D, Robinson S. Challenges and opportunities for integration in health systems: an Australian perspective. J Integr Care 2013; 21 347–59.
Challenges and opportunities for integration in health systems: an Australian perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  The Canterbury Initiative. HealthPathways. Canterbury: The Canterbury District Health Board; 2009. Available at: http://www.canterburyinitiative.org.nz/Home.aspx [verified 4 December 2014].

[5]  Timmins N, Ham C. The quest for integrated health and social care: a case study in Canterbury, New Zealand. London: The Kings Fund; 2013.

[6]  Australian Medicare Local Alliance. HealthPathways: an evaluation of its implementation in five Australian Medicare Locals. Canberra: Alison Boughey Consulting; 2014.

[7]  BMcD Consulting. Process evaluation of the Hunter and New England HealthPathways. Newcastle: BMcD Consulting; 2013.

[8]  Barwon Medicare Local. HealthPathways. Geelong: Barwon Medicare Local; 2013. Available at: http://www.barwonml.com.au/health-professionals/healthpathways [verified 4 December 2014].

[9]  Bullivant J, Corbett-Nolan A. Clinical audit: a guide for NHS boards and partners. London: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership; 2010. Available at: http://www.hqip.org.uk/assets/Guidance/HQIP-Clinical-Audit-Simple-Guide-online1.pdf [verified 4 December 2014].

[10]  Barwon Medicare Local. Our region’s health – characteristics. Available at: http://www.barwonml.com.au/our-healthy-region/characteristics [verified 4 December 2014].

[11]  Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Besters CF, Han D, Westert GP. Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: a survey among general practitioners. BMC Fam Pract 2011; 12 98
Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: a survey among general practitioners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21939542PubMed |

[12]  Burgers JS, Grol RP, Zaat JO, Spies TH, van der Bij AK, Mokkink HG. Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2003; 53 15–19.
| 12569898PubMed |

[13]  Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ 1998; 317 858–61.
Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvitFCgsg%3D%3D&md5=b54d7825ca77542af27126c26308b714CAS | 9748183PubMed |