CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Animal Production Science
Journal Banner
  Food, Fibre and Pharmaceuticals from Animals
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notes for Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

New Feature

New Commenting Tool
Join the conversation and leave comments on all new journal articles.


blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

 

Open Access Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 51(9)

On-farm paddock-scale comparisons across southern Australia confirm that increasing the nutrition of Merino ewes improves their production and the lifetime performance of their progeny

R. Behrendt A I, A. J. van Burgel B, A. Bailey E, P. Barber A C, M. Curnow B, D. J. Gordon A F, J. E. Hocking Edwards D, C. M. Oldham B and A. N. Thompson A G H

A Department of Primary Industries Victoria, Private Bag 105, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.
B Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 444 Albany Highway, Albany, WA 6330, Australia.
C Tanmill, Geelong West, Vic. 3218, Australia.
D South Australia Research and Development Institute, Struan Research Centre, PO Box 618, Naracoorte, SA 5271, Australia.
E Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research, PO Box 46, Kings Meadows, Tas. 7249, Australia.
F Present address: Rural Industries Skills Training, PB 105 Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.
G Present address: Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.
H Present address: School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
I Corresponding author. Email: Ralph.Behrendt@dpi.vic.gov.au

Animal Production Science 51(9) 805-812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN10183
Submitted: 22 September 2010  Accepted: 21 June 2011   Published: 14 September 2011
 
 Full Text
 PDF (634 KB)
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

Experiments conducted by Lifetimewool at plot-scale have shown that differences in the maternal liveweight during pregnancy and lactation (liveweight profiles) of individual Merino ewes influences their wool production and reproductive rate as well as the birthweight, survival, weaning weight and lifetime wool production of their lambs in a predictable manner. This study determined whether these impacts of nutrition of the ewe on ewe and progeny performance are measurable on commercial properties across southern Australia at a paddock-scale where ewes were aggregated into flocks with a greater spread of the date of conception and where the liveweight profile of the flocks were managed based on random samples of 100 ewes and liveweight was uncorrected for fleece weight or conceptus. Eighteen paddock-scale experiments at 15 sites were conducted in cooperation with wool producers across Victoria, Western Australia, New South Wales, South Australia, and Tasmania. Each co-operator joined up to 1000 mixed aged adult Merino ewes. The flock was scanned using ultrasound at Day 50 from the start of joining to identify those ewes that conceived during the first 21 days of joining. These ewes were then split at random into two treatments and fed to achieve a target difference in liveweight of 10 kg or ~1 condition score/fat score at lambing. The production of ewes during their year of pregnancy and following their next joining was measured as was the performance of their progeny up to their third shearing. Only the 13 paddock-scale experiments that achieved a difference in liveweight profile at lambing of at least 4 kg were included in the final analysis. In these 13 experiments, increasing the nutrition of Merino ewes during pregnancy clearly increased the clean fleece weight and fibre diameter in ewes and the survival and lifetime wool production of their lambs. In most cases the size of the effect was not significantly different to that predicted by the relationship derived using individual liveweight profiles in the plot-scale experiments. This confirms that managing average ewe liveweight or condition score/fat score profile through better nutrition will lead to predictable increases in the performance of ewes and their progeny performance under commercial conditions and validates the use of the plot-scale relationships in economic analyses.

Additional keywords: condition score, ewe nutrition, liveweight, wool production.


References

Curnow M, Oldham CM, Behrendt R, Gordon DJ, Hyder MW, Rose IJ, Whale JW, Young JM, Thompson AN (2011) Successful adoption of new guidelines for the nutritional management of ewes is dependent on the development of appropriate tools and information. Animal Production Science 51, 851–856.
| CrossRef |

Davidson BR, Martin BR, Mauldon RG (1967) The application of experimental research to farm production. Journal of Farm Economics 49, 900–907.
| CrossRef |

Davis GH, Wallis TR, Bray AR (1981) Marked udder method (MUM) – a technique for identifying the progeny of ewes where identification at birth is not practicable. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 41, 229–232.

Donnelly J, Freer M, Salmon L, Moore A, Simpson R, Dove H, Bolger T (2002) Evolution of the GRAZPLAN decision support tools and adoption by the grazing industry in temperate. Australia Agricultural Systems 74, 115–139.
| CrossRef |

Ferguson MB, Thompson AN, Gordon DJ, Hyder MW, Kearney GA, Oldham CM, Paganoni BL (2011) The wool production and reproduction of Merino ewes can be predicted from changes in liveweight during pregnancy and lactation. Animal Production Science 51, 763–775.
| CrossRef |

Genstat Committee (2007) ‘Genstat. Release 10.1.’ (VSN International Ltd: Oxford)

Hatcher S, Atkins KD, Safari E (2010) Lamb survival in Australian Merino sheep: a genetic analysis. Journal of Animal Science 88, 3198–3205.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Hocking Edwards JE, Copping KJ, Thompson AN (2011) Managing the nutrition of twin-bearing ewes during pregnancy using Lifetimewool recommendations increases production of twin lambs. Animal Production Science 51, 813–820.
| CrossRef |

Jefferies BC (1961) Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 39, 19–21.

Jones A, van Burgel AJ, Behrendt R, Curnow M, Gordon DJ, Oldham CM, Rose IJ, Thompson AN (2011) Evaluation of the impact of Lifetimewool on sheep producers. Animal Production Science 51, 857–865.
| CrossRef |

O’Halloran WJ, Thompson JM, McNeill DM, May TJ, Jackson-Hope NJ (1986) The effect of pre-slaughter fasting on liveweight, carcase weight and fat loss in prime lambs. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 34, 12–16.

Oldham CM, Thompson AN, Ferguson MB, Gordon DJ, Kearney GA, Paganoni BL (2011) The birthweight and survival of Merino lambs can be predicted from the profile of liveweight change of their mothers during pregnancy. Animal Production Science 51, 776–783.
| CrossRef |

Smith KF, Flinn PC (1991) Monitoring the performance of a broad-based calibration for measuring the nutritive value of two independent populations of pasture using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 205–210.

Thompson AN, Ferguson MB, Campbell AJD, Gordon DJ, Kearney GA, Oldham CM, Paganoni BL (2011a) Improving the nutrition of Merino ewes during pregnancy and lactation increases weaning weight and survival of progeny but does not affect their mature size. Animal Production Science 51, 784–793.
| CrossRef |

Thompson AN, Ferguson MB, Gordon DJ, Kearney GA, Oldham CM, Paganoni BL (2011b) Improving the nutrition of Merino ewes during pregnancy increases the fleece weight and reduces the fibre diameter of their progeny’s wool during their lifetime and these effects can be predicted from the ewe’s liveweight profile. Animal Production Science 51, 794–804.
| CrossRef |

Trompf JP, Gordon DJ, Behrendt R, Curnow M, Kildey L, Thompson AN (2011) Participation in Lifetime Ewe Management results in changes in stocking rate, ewe management and reproductive performance on commercial farms. Animal Production Science 51, 866–872.
| CrossRef |

van Burgel AJ, Oldham CM, Behrendt R, Curnow M, Gordon DJ, Thompson AN (2011) The merit of condition score and fat score as alternatives to liveweight for managing the nutrition of ewes. Animal Production Science 51, 834–841.
| CrossRef |

Young JM, Thompson AN, Oldham CM (2008) Increasing profitability by pregnancy scanning ewes. Livestock Updates, Department of Agriculture and Food, WA, 1–2 July 2008, Perth.

Young JM, Thompson AN, Curnow M, Oldham CM (2011) Whole-farm profit and the optimum maternal liveweight profile of Merino ewe flocks lambing in winter and spring are influenced by the effects of ewe nutrition on the progeny’s survival and lifetime wool production. Animal Production Science 51, 821–833.
| CrossRef |


   
 


    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013