Variation in the whiteness and brightness of white Australian cashmere associated with farm of origin and fibre attributes

Article

<< Previous

Next >>

Contents Vol 52(7)

doi:10.1071/AN11223

Food, Fibre and Pharmaceuticals from Animals

	Search




	Advanced Search



	Journal Home

	About the Journal

	Editorial Board

	Contacts



	Content

	Online Early

	Current Issue

	Just Accepted

	All Issues

	Special Issues

	Research Fronts

	Reviews

	Sample Issue



	For Authors

	General Information

	Notes for Authors

	Submit Article

	Open Access



	For Referees

	Referee Guidelines

	Review Article



	For Subscribers

	Subscription Prices

	Customer Service

	Print Publication Dates

New Feature

New Commenting Tool
Join the conversation and leave comments on all new journal articles.

e-Alerts

Subscribe to our Email Alert or

feeds for the latest journal papers.

Connect with us

Variation in the whiteness and brightness of white Australian cashmere associated with farm of origin and fibre attributes

B. A. McGregor

Centre for Material and Fibre Innovation, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia. Email: bruce.mcgregor@deakin.edu.au

Animal Production Science 52(7) 436-441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN11223
Submitted: 11 October 2011 Accepted: 1 January 2012 Published: 20 March 2012





	PDF (260 KB) $25



	Export Citation

Print

Abstract

While white cashmere is preferred by processors, its whiteness and brightness is affected by country of origin, amino acid composition, nutrition and cashmere production of goats. This work aimed to quantify the factors which affect the whiteness and brightness of 36 batches of processed Australian white cashmere sourced from nine different farms. The cashmere was tested for tristimulus values brightness (Y) and whiteness, as measured by yellowness (Y-Z). Linear models, relating Y and Y-Z were fitted to farm of origin and other objective measurements. Mean attributes (range) were: mean fibre diameter, 16.9 µm (13.9–20.4 μm); fibre curvature, 45°/mm (31–59°/mm); clean washing yield, 91.3% (79.5–97.3%); Y, 78.7 (74.7–82.2); Y-Z, 11.9 (10.3–13.6). Farm alone accounted for 72% of the variation in Y and 65% of the variation in Y-Z (P < 0.001). Once farm had been taken into account only fibre curvature (P = 0.003) was significant in predicting Y and only clean washing yield (P = 0.047) affected Y-Z. Neither the proportion of the fleece present as guard hair (clean cashmere yield) nor cashmere staple length was a significant determinant of Y or Y-Z. For each 10°/mm increase in fibre curvature Y increased 1.3 units. For each 10% increase in clean washing yield Y-Z declined 0.9 units. Variations in Y and Y-Z among farms were probably related to differences in geographic and climatic conditions and were significantly correlated to cashmere production. The effect of clean washing yield was probably related to a reduction in suint content.

Additional keywords: curvature, washing yield, wool, yellowness.

References

Aitken FJ, Cottle DJ, Reid TC, Wilkinson BR (1994) Mineral and amino-acid-composition of wool from New Zealand Merino sheep differing in susceptibility to yellowing. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 391–401.
| CrossRef | CAS |

David HG, Lead JA (1982) The relation between the scoured color of raw wool and its suint content. Journal of the Textile Institute 73, 84–89.
| CrossRef |

Fleet MR, Millington KR, King AL (2010) Sunlight exposure caused yellowing and increased mineral content in wool. Animal Production Science 50, 300–308.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Godar DE (2005) UV does worldwide. Photochemistry and Photobiology 81, 736–749.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Goddinger D, Schäfer K, Höcker H (1994) Phenylalanine and tyrosine – 2 aromatic-amino-acids involved in the photoyellowing of wool. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 42, 83–89.

Hatcher S, Hynd PI, Thornberry KJ, Gabb S (2010) Can we breed Merino sheep with softer, whiter, more photostable wool? Animal Production Science 50, 1089–1097.
| CrossRef |

Hoare JL, Stewart RG (1971) Some aspects of suint composition and yellow discoloration in New Zealand wools. Journal of the Textile Institute 62, 455–464.
| CAS |

International Wool Textile Organisation (2005a) ‘Determination of wool base and vegetable matter base of core samples of raw wool.’ IWTO-19. (International Wool Textile Organisation: Ilkley, UK)

International Wool Textile Organisation (2005b) ‘Measurement of the mean and distribution of fibre diameter of wool using an optical fibre diameter analyser (OFDA).’ IWTO-47. (International Wool Textile Organisation: Ilkley, UK)

International Wool Textile Organisation (2005c) ‘Determination of medullated fibre content of wool and mohair samples by opacity measurement using an OFDA.’ IWTO-57. (International Wool Textile Organisation: Ilkley, UK)

International Wool Textile Organisation (2005d) ‘Method for the measurement of the colour of raw wool.’ IWTO-14. (International Wool Textile Organisation: Ilkley, UK)

McGregor BA (1988) Effects of different nutritional regimens on the productivity of Australian Cashmere goats and the partitioning of nutrients between cashmere and hair growth. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28, 459–467.
| CrossRef |

McGregor BA (2000) Quality attributes of cashmere. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th International Wool Textile Research Conference’. Aachen. (Eds H Höcker, B Küppers) SF 1–10. (Deutsches Wollforschungsinstitut: Aachen, Germany)

McGregor BA (2001) The quality of cashmere and its influence on textile materials produced from cashmere and blends with superfine wool. PhD thesis. (The University of New South Wales: Sydney, Australia)

McGregor BA (2003) Influence of nutrition, fibre diameter and fibre length on the fibre curvature of cashmere. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1199–1209.

McGregor BA (2007) Cashmere fibre crimp, crimp form and fibre curvature. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 55, 106–129.

McGregor BA, Butler KL (2008a) The effects of cashmere attributes on the efficiency of dehairing and dehaired cashmere length. Textile Research Journal 78, 486–496.
| CrossRef | CAS |

McGregor BA, Butler KL (2008b) Determinants of cashmere production: the contribution of fleece measurements and animal growth on farms. Small Ruminant Research 78, 96–105.
| CrossRef |

McGregor BA, Butler KL (2008c) Cashmere production and fleece attributes associated with farm of origin, age and sex of goat in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1090–1098.
| CrossRef |

McGregor BA, Tucker DJ (2010) Affect of nutrition and origin on the amino acid, grease and suint composition and colour of cashmere and guard hairs. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 117, 409–420.
| CAS |

Millington KR (2006a) Photoyellowing of wool. Part 1: Factors affecting photoyellowing and experimental techniques. Coloration Technology 122, 169–186.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Millington KR (2006b) Photoyellowing of wool. Part 2: Photoyellowing mechanisms and methods of prevention. Coloration Technology 122, 301–316.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Payne RW (Ed.) (2011) ‘The guide to Genstat. Release 14. Part 2: statistics.’ (VSN International: Hertfordshire, UK)

Peterson AD, Gheradi SG (1996) Measurement of cashmere yield and mean fibre diameter using the Optical Fibre Diameter Analyser. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36, 429–435.
| CrossRef |

Wood E (2002) The basics of wool colour measurement. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 121–132.

Wuliji T, Dodds KG, Land JTJ, Andrews RN, Turner PR (2001) Selection for ultrafine Merino sheep in New Zealand: heritability, phenotypic and genetic correlations of live weight, fleece weight and wool characteristics in yearlings. Animal Science (Penicuik, Scotland) 72, 241–250.

Subscriber Login

	Username: Password:

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help