CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Animal Production Science
Journal Banner
  Food, Fibre and Pharmaceuticals from Animals
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notes for Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

New Feature

New Commenting Tool
Join the conversation and leave comments on all new journal articles.


blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 52(7)

Ewe movement and ewe-lamb contact levels in shelter are greater at higher stocking rates

J. C. Broster A B C , D. P. Rathbone A , S. M. Robertson A B , B. J. King A B and M. A. Friend A B

A EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.
B Co-operative Research Centre for Future Farm Industries, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: jbroster@csu.edu.au

Animal Production Science 52(7) 502-506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN11264
Submitted: 31 October 2011  Accepted: 19 March 2011   Published: 29 May 2012


 
PDF (166 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

This experiment used contact loggers and GPS collars to evaluate the effect of stocking rate during lambing on ewe movement and contact levels between animals. Twin-bearing Merino ewes were placed in 0.5-ha paddocks sheltered with rows of hessian at stocking rates of 16 and 30 ewes/ha for the low and high stocking rates, respectively. The ewes did not spend more time in more sheltered areas of the paddock, and use of shelter was not influenced by stocking rate. Ewes at the high stocking rate travelled 11% farther per day but crossed through the hessian rows 37% less than ewes at the low stocking rate. Stocking rate did not change the level of contact between ewes, but higher levels of contact were shown between ewes and their lambs at the high stocking rate. The results suggest that the interaction between ewes and their lambs is modified by stocking rate and/or flock size for small groups lambing in shelter rows.



References

Alexander G (1960) Maternal behaviour in the Merino ewe. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 3, 105–114.

Alexander G, Lynch JJ, Mottershead BE (1979) Use of shelter and selection of lambing sites by shorn and unshorn ewes in paddocks with closely or widely spaced shelters. Applied Animal Ethology 5, 51–69.
CrossRef |

Alexander G, Stevens D, Mottershead B (1983) Problems in the accurate recording of lambing data. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 23, 361–368.
CrossRef |

Arnold GW, Maller RA (1985) An analysis of factors influencing spatial distribution in flocks of grazing sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 14, 173–189.
CrossRef |

Arnold GW, Morgan PD (1975) Behaviour of the ewe and lamb at lambing and its relationship to lamb mortality. Applied Animal Ethology 2, 25–46.
CrossRef |

Bird PR, Lynch JJ, Obst J (1984) Effect of shelter on plant and animal production. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15, 270–273.

Broster JC, Swain DL, King BJ, Friend MA (2012) Data from reciprocal pairs of proximity loggers on Merino ewes. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production, in press.

Cloete SWP, Scholtz AJ, Ten Hoope JM (1998) A note on separation from one or more lamb(s) in Merino lines divergently selected for ewe multiple rearing ability. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58, 189–195.
CrossRef |

Ganskopp DC, Bohnert DW (2009) Landscape nutritional patterns and cattle distribution in rangeland pastures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 110–119.
CrossRef |

Genstat (2008) ‘Genstat release 11.1.’ (Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted Experimental Station: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Handcock RN, Swain DL, Bishop-Hurley GJ, Patison KP, Wark T, Valencia P, Corke P, O’Neill CJ (2009) Monitoring animal behaviour and environmental interactions using Wireless Sensor Networks, GPS Collars and Satellite Remote Sensing. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 9, 3586–3603.
CrossRef |

Heady HF (1964) Palatability of herbage and animal preference. Journal of Range Management 17, 76–82.
CrossRef |

Hobbs NT, Bowden DC (1982) Confidence intervals on food preference indices. The Journal of Wildlife Management 46, 505–507.
CrossRef |

Jefferies BC (1961) Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32, 19–21.

Kleemann DO, Grosser TI, Walker SK (2006) Fertility in South Australian commercial Merino flocks: aspects of management. Theriogenology 65, 1649–1665.
CrossRef |

Lindsay DR, Nowak R, Putu IG, McNeill D (1990) Behavioural interactions between the ewe and her young at parturition: a vital step for the lamb. In ‘Reproductive physiology of Merino sheep – concepts and consequences’. (Eds CM Oldham, GB Martin, IW Purvis) pp. 191–205. (School of Agriculture – Animal Science, The University of Western Australia: Perth)

McEachern S, Sackett D (2008) ‘Economic analysis of management options to improve reproductive performance in Merino ewes.’ (Holmes, Sackett & Associates Pty Ltd: Wagga Wagga)

Nowak R (1996) Neonatal survival: contributions from behavioural studies in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49, 61–72.
CrossRef |

Nowak R, Porter RH, Levy F, Orgeur P, Schaal B (2000) Role of mother-young interactions in the survival of offspring in domestic mammals. Reviews of Reproduction 5, 153–163.
CrossRef | CAS |

Penning PD, Parsons AJ, Newman JA, Orr RJ, Harvey A (1993) The effects of group size on grazing time in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37, 101–109.
CrossRef |

Robertson SM, Friend MA, Broster JC, King BJ (2011) Survival of twin lambs is increased with shrub belts. Animal Production Science 51, 925–938.
CrossRef |

Robertson SM, King BJ, Broster JC, Friend MA (2012) The survival of lambs in shelter declines at high stocking intensities. Animal Production Science 52, 497–501.
CrossRef |

Stevens D, Alexander G, Lynch JJ (1982) Lamb mortality due to inadequate care of twins by Merino ewes. Applied Animal Ethology 8, 243–252.
CrossRef |

Swain DL, Bishop-Hurley GJ (2007) Using contact logging devices to explore animal affiliations: quantifying cow-calf interactions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102, 1–11.
CrossRef |

Watson RH, Alexander G, Cumming IA, McDonald JW, McLaughlin JW, Rizzoli D, Williams D (1968) Reduction of perinatal loss of lambs in winter in western Victoria by lambing in sheltered individual pens. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 7, 243–249.

Winfield CG (1970) The effect of stocking intensity at lambing on lamb survival and ewe and lamb behaviour. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 8, 291–296.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 


    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013