|
A review of introduced cervids in Chile
Werner T.
Flueck A B C D E and
Jo Anne M.
Smith-Flueck D
A
National Council of Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET), Rivadavia 1917, 1033 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
B
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Socinstrasse 57, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.
C
Fundación Bariloche, C.C. 592, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina.
D
Institute of Natural Resources Analysis (IARN) – Patagonia, Universidad Atlántida Argentina, C.C. 592, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina.
E
Corresponding author. Email: wtf@deerlab.org
Animal Production Science
52(8)
681-684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN11343
Submitted: 12 December 2011 Accepted: 16 February 2012 Published:
12
June
2012
|  |
|
|
Abstract
We review the extent of exotic deer distributions in Chile, which are encountered in all provinces, including Tierra del Fuego, except for possibly Region III; many deer are contained in at least 107 enclosures. Red deer (Cervus elaphus) by far has the largest feral population of exotic cervids in southern South America, providing source animals that can easily cross the Andes between Chile and Argentina. Red deer was introduced from Europe to the central valley of Chile in 1928. Since the 1940s, feral populations have also expanded from Argentina into Chile, by way of easily accessible, low-elevation mountain passes of the Andes, accompanied by further direct shipments from Argentina. The area occupied by 1990 was estimated at 3400 km2, whereas an analysis in 2003 estimated an area of 7700 km2. The overall area invaded by 2003 was between 37°42′S and 54°55′S, and 73°36′W and 69°50′W (Argentina and Chile combined, although non-contiguous). Ecological impact of the red deer in Chile has been described since 1981, and red deer features in the Chilean Pest Manual. A conservative rate for the red deer expansion was estimated at 1 km/year, but likely is more rapid where habitat modifications facilitate movement. The pre-Columbian northern limit of the native cervid huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) was 30°S, and because red deer has occupied all habitat types currently used by huemul, it could thus spread >750 km further north. To the south, all areas are suitable for red deer. Invasion patterns will depend on additional intentional introductions and enclosures on both sides of the Andes because of the omnipresent risk of escapes. Fallow, axis and roe deer (Dama dama, Axis axis, Capreolus capreolus, respectively) also have been introduced to Chile and occur in many enclosures. Fallow deer recently escaped on Chiloé Island, became established and raised concerns because of its potential impacts on several endemic species on the island. The striking lack of information on feral deer may relate to policies and laws about firearms and restricted access to hunting areas, resulting in the apparent absence of popular hunting, which, nevertheless, could be a potential tool should the invasion continue and lead to future deer overabundance.
Additional keywords:
exotic deer, distribution, Cervus elaphus, Dama dama, Axis axis, Capreolus capreolus.
|
References
Caughley G (1983) ‘The deer wars.’ (Heinemann Publishers: Auckland, New Zealand)
Flueck WT (2010
)
The slippery slope of exporting invasive species: the case of Himalayan tahr arriving in South America.
Biological Invasions
12, 1467–1475.
|
CrossRef |
Flueck WT, Smith-Flueck JM (1993
)
Über das in Argentinien angesiedelte Rotwild (
Cervus elaphus, L., 1758): Verbreitung und Tendenzen.
Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft
39, 153–160.
|
CrossRef |
Flueck WT, Smith-Flueck JM, Naumann CM (2003
)
The current distribution of red deer (
Cervus elaphus) in southern Latin America.
European Journal of Wildlife Research
49, 112–119.
Iriarte A (2008) ‘Mamiferos de Chile’. (Lynx Ediciones: Barcelona, Spain)
Jaksic FM, Iriarte JA, Jiménez JE, Martínez DR (2002
)
Invaders without frontiers: cross-border invasions of exotic mammals.
Biological Invasions
4, 157–173.
|
CrossRef |
Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001
)
Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
16, 199–204.
|
CrossRef |
Lever C (1985) ‘Naturalized mammals of the world.’ (Longman Inc.: New York)
Navarro R, Álvarez L, Bórquez F (2009) Resultados y lecciones en cría del ciervo rojo en isla de Tierra del Fuego. In ‘Serie Experiencias de Innovación para el Emprendimiento Agrario. Vol. 54’. pp. 1–32. (Fund. Innovación Agraria: Santiago, Chile)
Nugent G, McShea WJ, Parkes J, Woodley S, Waithaka J, Moro J, Gutierrez R, Azorit C, Mendez Guerrero F, Flueck WT, Smith-Flueck JM (2011
)
Policies and management of overabundant deer (native or exotic) in protected areas.
Animal Production Science
51, 384–389.
Olson LJ (2006
)
The economics of terrestrial invasive species: a review of the literature.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review
35, 178–194.
Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000
)
Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States.
Bioscience
50, 53–65.
|
CrossRef |
SAG (2004) ‘Cartilla para cazadores. (Servicio Agricola y Ganadero: Santiago, Chile)
Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, LeRoy Poff N, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000
)
Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.
Science
287, 1770–1774.
|
CrossRef |
CAS |
Tala C, Stutzin M, Alcaide M (2004
)
Tenencia de fauna silvestre en cautiverio: una cuestión de normas legales, aunque también de ética y bienestar animal.
Boletin DEPROREN
1, 1–6.
Urrutia AB, Ojeda AA (2008) ‘Manual de Plagas y Enfermedades del Bosque Nativo en Chile.’ (Editora e Imprenta Maval Ltda: Santiago de Chile, Chile)
Wollenhaupt H (1983) Die Ansiedlung, Bestandesentwicklung und Status des Rothirsches (
Cervus elaphus L., 1758) in Chile. Dissertation, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany.
e-Alerts
Connect with us
