CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Australasian Plant Pathology   
Australasian Plant Pathology
  Research in all branches of plant pathology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Content
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues

 Australasian Plant Disease Notes
Disease notes, new records and quarantine interception reports are published in Australasian Plant Disease Notes.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 38(6)

Estimating disease losses to the Australian wheat industry

Gordon M. Murray A C, John P. Brennan B

A 215 Brucedale Drive, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
B Coolamaine Economic Research, PO Box 309, Castlemaine, Vic. 3450, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: gordonmur@gmail.com
 
 Full Text
 PDF (150 KB)
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

The incidence, severity and yield loss caused by 41 pathogens were assessed from a survey of 18 wheat pathologists covering the wheat-growing areas of Australia. The survey provided data on the frequency of years that each pathogen developed to its maximum extent, the proportion of the crop then affected in each growing area, and the yield loss that resulted in the affected crops with and without current control measures. These data were combined with crop production and quality data to estimate the value of the losses aggregated to the Northern, Southern and Western production regions. Pathogens were estimated to cause a current average loss of $913 × 106/year or 19.5% of the average annual value of the wheat crop in the decade from 1998–99 to 2007–08. Nationally, the three most important pathogens were Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, Puccinia striiformis and Phaeosphaeria nodorum with current average annual losses of $212 × 106, $127 × 106 and $108 × 106, respectively. If current controls were not used, losses would be far higher with potential average annual losses from the three most important pathogens, P. striiformis, P. tritici-repentis and Heterodera avenae, being $994 × 106, $676 × 106 and $572 × 106, respectively. The average value of control practices exceeded $100 × 106/year for 12 pathogens. Cultural methods (rotation, paddock preparation) were the only controls used for 10 pathogens and contributed more than 50% of the control for a further eight pathogens. Breeding and the use of resistant cultivars contributed more than 50% of control for seven pathogens and pesticides for three pathogens. The relative importance of pathogens varied between regions and zones.

Keywords: bacteria, crop loss assessment, fungi, nematodes, rust, Septoria, tan spot, viruses.


   
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012