CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Crop & Pasture Science
  Continuing Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
You are here: Journals > Crop & Pasture Science   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Sites of Interest
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Companion crop performance in relation to annual biomass production, resource supply, and subsoil drying

R. H. Harris A C F G, M. C. Crawford B F, W. D. Bellotti C F, M. B. Peoples D F and S. Norng E

A Department of Primary Industries, Rutherglen Centre, RMB 1145 Chiltern Valley Rd, Rutherglen, Victoria 3685, Australia.
B Department of Primary Industries, Bendigo Centre, PO Box 3100 Bendigo D C, Bendigo, Victoria 3554, Australia.
C School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.
D CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
E Department of Primary Industries, Tatura Centre, Private Bag 1, Ferguson Rd, Tatura, Victoria 3616, Australia.
F CRC for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity, M081 – UWA, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
G Corresponding author. Email: rob.harris@dpi.vic.gov.au


Abstract

A field experiment located in NE Victoria compared the productivity of cereals sown into mature lucerne (companion crop) with cereals and lucerne grown as monocultures. Additional nitrogen (N) and water was applied to investigate if increased resource supply could alleviate competition and improve cereal performance in the presence of lucerne. Cereal plant populations, lucerne and cereal biomass, and cereal grain yields and protein were measured throughout the experiment. Soil water content was also monitored over time to determine whether companion cropping compromised the ability of lucerne to extract deep soil water. While companion cropping depressed both lucerne and cereal production, the combined annual biomass production was greater than cereal and lucerne when grown alone. Averaged over the three seasons, companion cropping resulted in a 31% increase (P < 0.05) in total annual biomass compared with the lucerne monoculture, and an 18% increase compared with the cereal monoculture in the 2004–05 and 2005–06 seasons. Cereals growing with lucerne produced fewer tillers, spikes and consequently cereal biomass compared with cereals growing as a monoculture. Therefore, companion crops yielded 25% less (P < 0.05) grain compared with the cereal monoculture over the 3-year study. Competition for N and light in the pre-cereal stem elongation period, were likely causes. Increasing the supply of N and water did not result in a main treatment (monoculture v. companion crop) by additional resource interaction, indicating that cereal responses were the same irrespective of lucerne’s presence. The application of N, water and these combined inputs, resulted in a 13–40%, 35% and 49% increase (P < 0.05) in cereal grain yields, respectively. While companion cropping compromised lucerne’s capacity to extract water from deep soil layers to a degree, this practice was still able to maintain drier subsoil in comparison to the cereal monoculture.

Keywords: companion crops, inter-cropping, lucerne, Medicago sativa, nitrogen application, over-cropping, pasture cropping, triticale, wheat.

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(1) 1–12    doi:10.1071/AR07135
Submitted: 30 March 2007    Accepted: 1 August 2007    Published: 14 January 2008





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (240 KB) $25
Export Citation
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010