|
Comparison of Potential ASKAP Hi Survey Source Finders
A.
Popping A E,
R.
Jurek B,
T.
Westmeier A,
P.
Serra A,
L.
Flöer D,
M.
Meyer A and
B.
Koribalski B
A
International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research (ICRAR), The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
B
Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia
C
Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy (ASTRON), Postbus 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands
D
Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany
E
Corresponding author. Email: attila.popping@icrar.org
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
29(3)
318-339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AS11067
Submitted: 8 November 2011 Accepted: 19 January 2012 Published:
24
February
2012
|  |
|
|
Abstract
The large size of the ASKAP Hi surveys DINGO and WALLABY necessitates automated 3D source finding. A performance difference of a few percent corresponds to a significant number of galaxies being detected or undetected. As such, the performance of the automated source finding is of paramount importance to both of these surveys. We have analysed the performance of various source finders to determine which will allow us to meet our survey goals during the DINGO and WALLABY design studies. Here we present a comparison of the performance of five different methods of automated source finding. These source finders are duchamp, gamma-finder, a cnhi finder, a 2d–1d wavelet reconstruction finder and a sigma clipping method (s+c finder). Each source finder was applied to the same three-dimensional data cubes containing (a) point sources with a Gaussian velocity profile and (b) spatially extended model-galaxies with inclinations and rotation profiles. We focus on the completeness and reliability of each algorithm when comparing the performance of the different source finders.
Keywords: methods: data analysis
|
References
Boyce, P., 2003, MSc Dissertation, University of Cardiff
Deboer, D. R.
et al., 2009 , IEEEP, 97, 1507 
Dewdney, P. E., Hall, P. J., Schilizzi, R. T. and Lazio, T. J. L., 2009 , IEEEP, 97, 1482
Driver, S. P.
et al., 1999 , A&G, 50, 12
Flöer, L. and Winkel, B., 2012 , PASA, 29, 244 | CrossRef |
Haynes, M. P.
et al., 2011 , AJ, 142, 170
Hibbard, J. E., van Gorkom, J. H., Rupen, M. P. and Schiminovich, D., 2001 , ASPC, 240, 657
Johnston, S.
et al., 2008 , ExA, 22, 151
Jonas, J. L., 2009 , IEEEP, 97, 1522
Jones, A. J., Evans, D., Margetts, S. & Durrant, P. J., 2002, in Heuristic and Optimization for Knowledge Discovery, ed. H. A. Abbass, C. S. Newton & R. Sarker (Hershey: Idea Group Publishing), 142
Jurek, R., 2012 , PASA, 29, 251 | CrossRef |
Koribalski, B. S. & Staveley-Smith, L., 2009, ASKAP Survey Science Proposal
Koribalski, B. S.
et al., 2004 , AJ, 128, 16 | CAS |
Meyer, M. J.
et al., 2004 , MNRAS, 350, 1195 | CrossRef | CAS |
Meyer, M., 2009, in Panoramic Radio Astronomy: Wide-field 1–2 GHz Research on Galaxy Evolution, ed. G. Heald & P. Serra, Proceedings of Science, PoS(PRA2009)015
Minchin, R. F.
et al., 2003 , MNRAS, 346, 787 | CrossRef | CAS |
Putman, M. E.
et al., 2002 , AJ, 123, 873
Serra, P., et al., 2011, MNRAS, submitted
Serra, P., Jurek, R. and Flöer, L., 2012 , PASA, 29, 296 | CrossRef |
Springob, C. M.
et al., 2005 , ApJS, 160, 149 | CrossRef | CAS |
Starck, J. L., Fadili, J. M., Digel, S., Zhang, B. and Chiang, J., 2009 , A&A, 504, 641 | CAS |
Stefansson, A., Koncar, N. and Jones, A. J., 1997 , Neural Computing and Applications, 5, 131 | CrossRef |
Verheijen, M. A. W., Oosterloo, T. A., van Cappellen, W. A., Bakker, L., Ivashina, M. V. and van der Hulst, J. M., 2008 , AIPC, 1035, 265 | CAS |
Westmeier, T., Popping, A. and Serra, P., 2012 , PASA, 29, 276 | CrossRef |
Whiting, M. T., 2011, MNRAS, arXiv1201.2710
|
|
|
| |
|
|
