Patterns of polyembryony and frequency of surviving multiple embryos of the Brazilian pine Araucaria angustifolia

Article

<< Previous

Next >>

Contents Vol 59(8)

doi:10.1071/BT11195

Southern Hemisphere Botanical Ecosystems

	Search




	Advanced Search



	Journal Home

	About the Journal

	Editorial Board

	Contacts



	Content

	Online Early

	Current Issue

	Just Accepted

	All Issues

	Special Issues

	Turner Review Series

	Sample Issue



	For Authors

	General Information

	Notice to Authors

	Submit Article

	Open Access



	For Referees

	General Information

	Review Article

	Annual Referee Index



	For Subscribers

	Subscription Prices

	Customer Service

	Print Publication Dates

e-Alerts

Subscribe to our Email Alert or

feeds for the latest journal papers.

Connect with us

Patterns of polyembryony and frequency of surviving multiple embryos of the Brazilian pine Araucaria angustifolia

Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen ^A ^C, Neusa Steiner ^B, Miguel Pedro Guerra ^A and Rubens Onofre Nodari ^A

^A Plant Developmental Physiology and Genetics Laboratory, CropScience Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina; Rod. Admar Gonzaga 1346, 88034-001, Florianópolis – Brazil.
^B Rural Sciences Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina; Rod. Ulisses Gaboardi, Km 3, 89520-000, Curitibanos – Brazil.
^C Corresponding author. Email: sarahagro@gmail.com

Australian Journal of Botany 59(8) 749-755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT11195
Submitted: 26 July 2011 Accepted: 24 November 2011 Published: 23 January 2012





	PDF (577 KB) $25



	Supplementary Material



	Export Citation

Print

Abstract

The development of polyembryony is a common reproductive strategy in conifers. Multiple embryos are observed during early seed developmental stages. However, upon seed maturation, only the dominant embryo survives, with few exceptions. Although programmed cell death has been reported as the major mechanism responsible for elimination of subordinate embryos, the genetics of surviving embryos and the probabilities of survival remain unclear. The aim of this study is to determine patterns of polyembryony and survival frequency in Araucaria angustifolia (Bert) O. Ktze. Thus, we investigate the morphogenetic parameters that might be related to embryo survival using nuclear microsatellite markers and morphological characteristics of immature embryos and seedlings. Our novel approach couples genotype frequency analysis with the number of surviving embryos, presence of embryo dominance and number of cotyledons present within a single seed. Polyembryonic seedling frequency was low (0.022%) and 91% of surviving embryos were monozygotic. From all monozygotic embryos, 98% showed differences in growth rate (height) in relation to each other. Concrescent tissues were common in the monozygotic polyembryony patterns observed (80%) but not for those with polyzygotic polyembryony. We demonstrate that the survival of multiple embryos is a rare event in A. angustifolia seeds. To the best of our knowledge this study represents the first evidence of cleavage polyembryony in immature embryos and seedlings from A. angustifolia. Our novel approach using a combined set of morphological parameters and microsatellite markers was successful in investigating polyembryony patterns and survival.

References

Bozhkov P (2005) Regulation of programmed cell death in plant embryogenesis. BMC Plant Biology 5, S6
| CrossRef |

Burdon RD, Zabkiewicz JA (1973) Identical and non-identical seedlings twins in Pinus radiata. Canadian Journal of Botany 51, 2001–2004.
| CrossRef |

Creste S, Tulmann Neto A, Figueira A (2001) Detection of single sequence repeat polymorphisms in denaturing polyacrylamide sequencing gels by silver staining. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 19, 299–306.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Dogra PD (1978) Morphology, development and nomenclature of conifer embryo. Phytomorphology 28, 307–322.

Doyle J (1957) Aspects and problems of conifer embryology. The Advanced Science Journal 14, 120–130.

Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochemical Bulletin 19, 11–15.

Durzan DJ (2008) Monozygotic cleavage polyembryogenesis and conifer tree improvement. Cytology and Genetics 42, 159–173.
| CrossRef |

Erdelska O, Vidovencova Z (1994) Cleavage polyembryony in vivo and in vitro. Biologia Plantarum 36, 329–334.
| CrossRef |

Filonova L, von Arnold S, Daniels J, Bozhkov P (2002) Programmed cell death eliminates all but one embryo in polyembryonic plant seed. Cell Death and Differentiation 9, 1057–1062.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Gupta PK, Pullman GS (1991) Method for reproducing coniferous plants by somatic embryogenesis using abscisic acid and osmotic potential variation. US Patent 5036007.

Haines RJ, Prakash N (1980) Proembryo development and suspensor elongation in Araucaria Juss. Australian Journal of Botany 28, 511–522.
| CrossRef |

Henderson ST, Petes TD (1992) Instability of simple sequence DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and Cellular Biology 12, 2749–2757.
| CAS |

Johansen DA (1950) ‘Plant embryology.’ (Chronica Botanica Co.: Waltham, MA)

Krutovskii KV, Politov DV (1995) Allozyme evidence for polyzygotic polyembryony in Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90, 811–818.
| CrossRef |

Maheshwari P, Singh H (1967) The female gametophyte of gymnosperms. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 42, 88–129.
| CrossRef |

Mantovani A, Morellato PC, Dos Reis MS (2004) Fenologia reprodutiva e produção de sementes em Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Kuntze. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 27, 787–796.

Orr-Ewing A (1957) A cytological study of the effects of self-pollination on Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. Silvae Genetica 6, 179–185.

Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. The Journal of Heredity 86, 248–249.

Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8, 103–106.
| CrossRef |

Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) ‘Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual.’ 2nd edn. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York)

Schmidt AB, Ciampi AY, Guerra MP, Nodari RO (2007) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae). Molecular Ecology Notes 7, 340–342.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Steiner N, Vieira FN, Maldonado S, Guerra MP (2005) Effect of carbon source on morphology and histodifferentiation of Araucaria angustifolia embryogenic cultures. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 48, 895–903.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Strand M, Prolla TA, Liskay RM, Petes TD (1993) Destabilization of tract of simple repetitive DNA in yeast by mutations affecting DNA mismatch repair. Nature 365, 274–276.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Von Arnold S, Sabala I, Bozkov P, Dyachok J, Filonova L (2002) Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 69, 233–249.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Vuosku J, Sutela S, Tillman-Sutela E, Kauppi A, Jokela A, Sarjala T, Häggman H (2009a) Pine embryogenesis: many licences to kill for a new life. Plant Signaling & Behavior 4, 928–932.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Vuosku J, Sarjala T, Jokela A, Sutela S, Sääskilahti L, Suorsa M, Läärä M, Häggman H (2009b) One tissue, two fates: different roles of megagametophyte cells during Scots pine embryogenesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 1375–1386.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Wendt dos Santos AL, Steiner N, Guerra MP, Zoglauer K, Moerschbacher MB (2008) Somatic embryogenesis in Araucaria angustifolia. Biologia Plantarum 52, 195–199.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Williams CG (2007) Re-thinking the embryo lethal system within the Pinaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 85, 667–677.
| CrossRef |

Williams CG (2008) Selfed embryo death in Pinus taeda: a phenotypic profile. New Phytologist 178, 210–222.
| CrossRef |

Williams CG (2009) ‘Conifer reproductive biology.’ (Springer: New York)10.1007/978-1-4020-9602-0

Wright S (1949) The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15, 323–354.
| CrossRef |

Subscriber Login

	Username: Password:

Top

Email this page

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help