Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Integrating dual-purpose wheat and canola into high-rainfall livestock systems in south-eastern Australia. 1. Crop forage and grain yield

S. J. Sprague A B , J. A. Kirkegaard A , H. Dove A , J. M. Graham A , S. E. McDonald A and W. M. Kelman A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Agriculture Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: susan.sprague@csiro.au

Crop and Pasture Science 66(4) 365-376 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14200
Submitted: 21 July 2014  Accepted: 22 December 2014   Published: 31 March 2015

Abstract

The development of guidelines for successful dual-purpose (graze and grain) use of wheat and canola in Australia’s high-rainfall zones (HRZ) has mostly emerged from separate wheat- and canola-focused research. Less attention has been placed on the benefits of integrating dual-purpose wheat and canola into pasture-based grazing enterprises. We conducted a farming systems experiment during 2010–11 to evaluate the benefits of integrating wheat and canola as dual-purpose crops into a pasture-based grazing system in Australia’s south-eastern tablelands. We compared forage production and grain yield in three separate crop–livestock systems in which the sheep grazed long-season wheat, winter canola or a combination of these. Initial growth rates were higher in early-autumn-sown canola than wheat in 2010, but were much lower although similar in both crops in 2011. Significant forage was available from both canola (3.1–3.4 t ha–1) and wheat (2.3–2.4 t ha–1) at the onset of grazing, but winter growth rates of wheat were higher than those of canola, leading to increased sheep grazing days (SGD). In the favourable 2010 season, dual-purpose wheat and canola separately provided 2393 and 2095 SGD ha–1, and yielded 5.0 and 1.9 t ha–1 grain, respectively, with an apparent nitrogen limitation in canola. In the drier season of 2011, grazing was reduced to 1455 and 735 SGD ha–1 in wheat and canola, respectively. Wheat yield was reduced from 5.9 to 5.4 t ha–1 grain by grazing, whereas canola yield was unaffected (3.6 t ha–1). In both years, grazing did not affect harvest index or oil content of canola, but harvest index was higher in grazed wheat crops. The yield of wheat and canola crops grazed in sequence did not differ from yield in treatments where animals grazed only a single crop, but the total overall grazing window when crops were grazed sequentially increased by 1054 and 618 SGD ha–1 in wheat, and by 1352 and 1338 SGD ha–1 in canola in 2010 and 2011, respectively. The major benefits of including crops that can be grazed sequentially were the widening of the grazing window and other operational windows (sowing, harvest), along with the rotational benefits for wheat by including canola in the system. Additional benefits to pastures may include eliminating the need to re-sow, because a more productive pasture composition is maintained under lower grazing pressure while stock are on crops, and reduced weed invasion. The commercial availability of new, herbicide-tolerant winter canola varieties provides significant opportunities to underpin the performance of dual-purpose crop sequences on mixed farms in the high-rainfall zone.


References

Angus JF, van Herwaarden AF, Fischer RA, Howe GN, Heenan DP (1998) The source of mineral nitrogen for cereals in southeastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 511–522.
The source of mineral nitrogen for cereals in southeastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXisFGqt74%3D&md5=f45202b430aace404178857deedf4db4CAS |

Bell LW, Moore AD, Kirkegaard JA (2014) Evolution in crop–livestock integration systems that improve farm productivity and environmental performance in Australia. European Journal of Agronomy 57, 10–20.
Evolution in crop–livestock integration systems that improve farm productivity and environmental performance in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bell LW, Dove H, McDonald SE, Kirkegaard JA (2015) Integrating dual-purpose wheat and canola into high-rainfall livestock systems in south-eastern Australia. 3. An extrapolation to whole-farm grazing potential, productivity and profitability. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 390–398.

Dann PR, Axelsen A, Edwards CBH (1977) The grain yield of winter grazed crops. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 17, 452–461.
The grain yield of winter grazed crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davidson JL, Jones DB, Christian KR (1990) Winter feed production and grain yield in mixtures of spring and winter wheats. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 1–18.
Winter feed production and grain yield in mixtures of spring and winter wheats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Diepenbrock W (2000) Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review. Field Crops Research 67, 35–49.
Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doole GJ, Bathgate AD, Robertson MJ (2009) Economic value of grazing vegetative wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crops in mixed-farming systems of Western Australia. Animal Production Science 49, 807–815.
Economic value of grazing vegetative wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crops in mixed-farming systems of Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dove H, Kirkegaard JA (2014) Using dual-purpose crops in sheep grazing systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94, 1276–1283.
Using dual-purpose crops in sheep grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXht1ygsLs%3D&md5=e5396dcaf916cf7ee15915a02e4f4f50CAS | 24323974PubMed |

Dove H, McMullen KG (2009) Diet selection, herbage intake and liveweight gain in young sheep grazing dual-purpose wheats and sheep responses to mineral supplements. Animal Production Science 49, 749–758.
Diet selection, herbage intake and liveweight gain in young sheep grazing dual-purpose wheats and sheep responses to mineral supplements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtFelsbvL&md5=740452f40d62ca73c7d1f6719e2c15f9CAS |

Dove H, Holst PJ, Stanley DF, Flint P (2002) Grazing value of dual-purpose winter wheats for young sheep. Animal Production in Australia 24, 53–56.

Dove H, Kelman WM, Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ (2012) Impact of sodium/magnesium supplementation on liveweight gains of young sheep grazing dual-purpose cereal or canola crops. Animal Production Science 52, 1027–1035.
Impact of sodium/magnesium supplementation on liveweight gains of young sheep grazing dual-purpose cereal or canola crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsVCgtbrO&md5=9dba0fde2aa04dd91a49f7a456a37952CAS |

Dove H, Kirkegaard JA, Kelman WM, Sprague SJ, McDonald SE, Graham JM (2015) Integrating dual-purpose wheat and canola into high-rainfall livestock systems in south-eastern Australia. 2. Pasture and livestock production. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 377–389.

Fischer RA (2007) Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science 145, 99–113.
Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Genstat Committee (2011) ‘Genstat ® for Windows.’ 14th edn (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Harrison MT, Evans JR, Dove H, Moore AD (2011a) Recovery dynamics of rainfed winter wheat after livestock grazing. 1. Growth rates, grain yields, soil water use and water-use efficiency. Crop & Pasture Science 62, 947–959.

Harrison MT, Evans JR, Dove H, Moore AD (2011b) Dual-purpose cereals: can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected? Crop & Pasture Science 62, 930–946.
Dual-purpose cereals: can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hocking PJ, Kirkegaard JA, Angus JF, Gibson AH, Koetz EA (1997) Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and linola in two contrasting environments. I. Effects of nitrogen fertiliser on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality. Field Crops Research 49, 107–125.
Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and linola in two contrasting environments. I. Effects of nitrogen fertiliser on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell R (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ Revised edn. Australian Soil and Land Survey Handbooks Series 4. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Kelman WM, Dove H (2007) Effects of a spring-sown brassica crop on lamb performance and on subsequent establishment and grain yield of dual-purpose winter wheat and oat crops. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 815–824.
Effects of a spring-sown brassica crop on lamb performance and on subsequent establishment and grain yield of dual-purpose winter wheat and oat crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kelman WM, Dove H (2009) Growth and phenology of winter wheat and oats in a dual-purpose management system. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 921–932.
Growth and phenology of winter wheat and oats in a dual-purpose management system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Christen O, Krupinsky J, Layzell D (2008a) Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crops Research 107, 185–195.
Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Dove H, Kelman WM, Marcroft SJ, Lieschke AK, Howe JN, Graham JM (2008b) Dual-purpose canola–a new opportunity in mixed farming systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 291–302.
Dual-purpose canola–a new opportunity in mixed farming systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Marcroft SJ, Potter TD, Graham J, Virgona J, McCormick J (2008c) Identifying canola varieties for dual-purpose use. In ‘Proceedings 14th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Adelaide, S. Aust. (Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute Ltd: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2008/concurrent/new-grazing-options/5932_kirkegaardja.htm#TopOfPage

Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Hamblin PJ, Graham JM, Lilley JM (2012a) Refining crop and livestock management for dual-purpose spring canola (Brassica napus). Crop & Pasture Science 63, 429–443.
Refining crop and livestock management for dual-purpose spring canola (Brassica napus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Lilley JM, McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Morrison MJ (2012b) Physiological response of spring canola (Brassica napus) to defoliation in diverse environments. Field Crops Research 125, 61–68.
Physiological response of spring canola (Brassica napus) to defoliation in diverse environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lilley JM, Bell LW, Kirkegaard JA (2015) Optimising grain yield and grazing potential of crops across Australia’s high-rainfall zone: a simulation analysis. 2. Canola. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 349–364.

McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Kirkegaard JA (2012) Growth and yield of dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) under drier inland seasonal conditions of south-eastern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 635–646.
Growth and yield of dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) under drier inland seasonal conditions of south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mendham HJ, Shipway PA, Scott RK (1981) The effect of delayed sowing and weather on growth, development and yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). The Journal of Agricultural Science 96, 389–416.
The effect of delayed sowing and weather on growth, development and yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moore AD, Bell LW, Revell DK (2009) Feed gaps in mixed-farming systems: insights from the Grain & Graze program. Animal Production Science 49, 736–748.

National Health and Medical Research Council (2004) Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes. National Health and Medical Research Council. Available at: www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/ea16.pdf (accessed 16 October 2013)

Price RJ, Hacker RB (2009) Grain & Graze: an innovative triple bottom line approach to collaborative and multidisciplinary mixed-farming systems research, development and extension. Animal Production Science 49, 729–735.
Grain & Graze: an innovative triple bottom line approach to collaborative and multidisciplinary mixed-farming systems research, development and extension.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Riffkin P, Potter T, Kearney G (2012) Yield performance of late-maturing winter canola (Brassica napus L.) types in the high rainfall zone of southern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 17–32.
Yield performance of late-maturing winter canola (Brassica napus L.) types in the high rainfall zone of southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Seymour M, Kirkegaard JA, Peoples MB, White PF, French RJ (2012) Break-crop benefits to wheat in Western Australia—insights from over three decades of research. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 1–16.
Break-crop benefits to wheat in Western Australia—insights from over three decades of research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sleeman SR (1979) The Soils of Ginninderra Experiment Station, ACT. CSIRO Division of Soils Divisional Report No. 41, CSIRO, Australia.

Sprague SJ, Kirkegaard JA, Graham J, Dove H, Kelman WM (2014) Crop and livestock production for dual-purpose winter canola (Brassica napus) in the high rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia. Field Crops Research 156, 30–39.
Crop and livestock production for dual-purpose winter canola (Brassica napus) in the high rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sprague SJ, Kirkegaard JA, Graham JM, Bell LW, Seymour M, Ryan M (2015) Forage and grain yield of diverse canola (Brassica napus) maturity types in the high-rainfall zone of Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 260–274.

Thomas DT, Moore AD, Norman HC, Revell CK (2015) Small effects of deferment of annual pastures through grazing spring wheat crops in Western Australia can benefit livestock productivity. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 410–417.

Thomas DT, Descheemaeker K, Moore AD (2012) Grazing spring variety cereal crops reduces supplementary feeding in mixed cropping and sheep farms. In ‘Proceedings 16th Australian Agronomy Conference’. 14–18 October 2014, Armidale, NSW. (Ed. I Yunusa) (Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute Ltd: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2012/crop-production/8117_thomasdt.htm

Virgona JM, Gummer FAJ, Angus JF (2006) Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 1307–1319.
Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Winter SR, Musick JT (1991) Grazed wheat grain yield relationships. Agronomy Journal 83, 130–135.
Grazed wheat grain yield relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Winter SR, Thompson EK, Musick JT (1990) Grazing winter wheat. II. Height effects on response to production systems. Agronomy Journal 82, 37–41.
Grazing winter wheat. II. Height effects on response to production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) Decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
Decimal code for growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhang H, Turner NC, Poole ML, Simpson N (2006) Crop production in the high rainfall zones of southern Australia — potential, constraints and opportunities. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1035–1049.
Crop production in the high rainfall zones of southern Australia — potential, constraints and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |