Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The use of animals in research: counting the costs and the benefits

M. D. Rickard
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

CSIRO Livestock Industries, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, PMB 24, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia. Email: mike.rickard@csiro.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44(11) 1079-1083 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA03233
Submitted: 16 November 2003  Accepted: 16 September 2004   Published: 14 December 2004

Abstract

The Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes requires Animal Ethics Committees to assess the merits of any research proposal involving the use of sentient animals. As part of that assessment they should make a judgment as to whether or not the costs to the welfare of the experimental animals are outweighed by the benefits of the predicted experimental outcome (i.e. conduct a cost–benefit analysis). This paper describes one approach that has been proposed to assist Animal Ethics Committees to take all factors into account when making this judgment. When agricultural animals are used in research the potential benefits are usually measured in terms of improved health and welfare or increased productivity when the research outcomes are applied to other animals reared in agricultural enterprises. When the aim of a project is to improve the health and welfare of the animals (i.e. ‘animal benefit’), the benefits are usually obvious and counting the cost is straightforward even if the impact on the animals under experimentation is quite extreme (e.g. death as an unavoidable endpoint in a vaccination experiment). Where the benefits accrue solely in terms of increased productivity or economic gain (i.e. ‘human benefit’), then balancing the costs and the benefits can be more problematical because people’s personal beliefs and their orientation towards animal welfare influence their assessment. Economists indicate that it is not increased productivity per se that generates value but consumption. Therefore, consumer perceptions of any adverse impact that gains in productivity have on the welfare of farmed animals can play a significant role in determining the ultimate benefit (value) of a particular piece of research with the sole aim to increase production and economic gain. This paper will explore some postulated relationships between productivity and animal welfare which could influence consumer preferences and hence the cost–benefit analysis.


References


Mellor DJ , Reid CSW (1993) Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals. In ‘Improving the well-being of animals in the research environment’. (Eds RM Baker, G Jenkin, DJ Mellor) pp. 3–18. (ANZCCART: Adelaide)

Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ (2001) Integrating practical, regulatory and ethical strategies for enhancing animal welfare. Australian Veterinary Journal 79, 762–768.
Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

McInerney JP (1998) The economics of welfare. In ‘Ethics, welfare, law and market forces: the veterinary interface, Proceedings of a Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) and Universities Federation of Animal Welfare (UFAW) Symposium held in November 1996’. (Eds AR Michell, R Edwards) pp. 115–134. (UFAW: London, UK)

McInerney J (2002) ‘Animal welfare: ethics, economics and productivity.’ A paper presented to a conference held jointly by the New Zealand National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee and the International Society of Applied Ethology, Hamilton, New Zealand, 27–28 June 2000.

Rickard MD (2004) The use of animals for research on animal diseases — its impact on the harm–benefit analysis. In ‘The three R’s at the beginning of the 21st century ATLA Supplelment 1A’. (Eds M Balls, D Firmani, RN Rowan) pp. 225–227. (FRAME: Nottingham)