CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Exploration Geophysics   
Exploration Geophysics
http://www.aseg.org.au
  The Bulletin of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Committee
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Sample Issue
Call for Papers
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

red arrow Submit Article
blank image
Use the online submission system to send us your paper.

red arrow Call for Papers
blank image
We are preparing a themed issue. More...

red arrow Preview
blank image
Preview, the Magazine of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, is also available online.

red arrow ASEG Extended Abstracts
blank image
ASEG Extended Abstracts, drawn from the ASEG´s conferencces, is also available online.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 41(4)

Is visual interactive ray trace an efficacious strategy for refraction inversion?

Derecke Palmer

School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia. Email: d.palmer@unsw.edu.au

Exploration Geophysics 41(4) 260-267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EG09028
Submitted: 10 June 2009  Accepted: 27 October 2010   Published: 15 December 2010


 
PDF (1.1 MB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

Visual interactive ray trace (VIRT) inversion is a manual approach to refraction tomography. VIRT tomograms neither detect nor define a major 50 m wide zone with a low seismic velocity at Mt Bulga. This failure is attributed to the probable use of a low resolution starting model, specifically the smooth velocity gradient wavepath eikonal traveltime (WET) tomogram, for the VIRT inversion. In this case, the low resolution of the VIRT tomogram is another demonstration of the ubiquity of non-uniqueness.

Alternatively, the conventional reciprocal method has been used to generate a starting model, in which the existence of the low velocity region is unequivocal. In this case, confirmation bias has been employed to remove any expression of the low velocity region in the VIRT tomogram.

By contrast, WET refraction tomograms produced with smooth and detailed starting models generated with the generalised reciprocal method (GRM) clearly define the 50 m wide zone with the low seismic velocities. The low velocity zone is confirmed with a priori information, specifically the inverted head wave amplitudes and a spectral analysis of the refraction convolution section, and by a posteriori information, specifically numerous closely spaced orthogonal refraction profiles. Furthermore, the GRM tomograms have smaller misfit errors than the tomograms obtained with VIRT tomography and with WET tomograms generated with VIRT starting models.

VIRT tomography generates complex velocity models of the weathering from relatively small numbers of traveltimes, indicating that VIRT is overfitting the data. The extensive use of vertical interfaces across which there are large contrasts in seismic velocities is not consistent with standard models of normal weathering profiles, nor is it indicated in the traveltime graphs. By contrast, VIRT generates simple velocity models in the sub-weathering from many traveltimes, indicating that VIRT is underfitting those traveltimes.

VIRT neither improves the accuracy nor the geological verisimilitude of refraction tomography. Furthermore, VIRT is time consuming, subjective, and in the final analysis, simply outdated. Although technically, VIRT is efficacious, the alternatives of automatic refraction tomography are more practical, more accurate, and generate more useful tomograms.

Key words:GRM, inversion, non-uniqueness, refraction, tomography, VIRT.


References

Ackermann, H. D., Pankratz, L. W., and Dansereau, D., 1982, A comprehensive system for interpreting seismic refraction arrival-time data using interactive computer methods: USGS Open File Report 82–1065.

Hagedoorn, J. G., 1959, The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections: Geophysical Prospecting, 7, 158–182
CrossRef |

Hagiwara, T., and Omote, S., 1939, Land creep at Mt Tyausu-Yama (Determination of slip plane by seismic prospecting): Tokyo University Earthquake Research Institute Bulletin, 17, 118–137

Hawkins, L. V., 1961, The reciprocal method of routine shallow seismic refraction investigations: Geophysics, 26, 806–819
CrossRef |

Ivanov, J., Miller, R. D., Xia, J., Steeples, D., and Park, C. B., 2005a, The inverse problem of refraction travel times, part I; types of geophysical nonuniqueness through minimization: Pure and Applied Geophysics, 162, 447–459
CrossRef |

Ivanov, J., Miller, R. D., Xia, J., and Steeples, D., 2005b, The inverse problem of refraction travel times, part II; quantifying refraction nonuniqueness using a three-layer model: Pure and Applied Geophysics, 162, 461–477
CrossRef |

Lanz, E., Maurer, H., and Green, A. G., 1998, Refraction tomography over a buried waste disposal site: Geophysics, 63, 1414–1433
CrossRef |

Menke, W., 1989, Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory, Academic Press.

Oldenburg, D. W., 1984, An introduction to linear inverse theory: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-22, 665-674.

Oldenburg, D. W., and Li, Y., 2005, Inversion for applied geophysics: a tutorial, in Dwain K. Butler, ed., Investigations in geophysics no. 13, pp. 89–150, SEG.

Palmer, D., 1980, The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 104 pp.

Palmer, D., 1981, An introduction to the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation: Geophysics, 46, 1508–1518
CrossRef |

Palmer, D., 1986, Refraction seismics: the lateral resolution of structure and seismic velocity: Geophysical Press.

Palmer, D., 1991, The resolution of narrow low-velocity zones with the generalized reciprocal method: Geophysical Prospecting, 39, 1031–1060
CrossRef |

Palmer, D., 2001a, Imaging refractors with the convolution section: Geophysics, 66, 1582–1589
CrossRef |

Palmer, D., 2001b, Resolving refractor ambiguities with amplitudes: Geophysics, 66, 1590–1593
CrossRef |

Palmer, D., 2001c, Measurement of rock fabric in shallow refraction seismology: Exploration Geophysics, 32, 307–314
CrossRef |

Palmer, D. 2003, Application of amplitudes in shallow seismic refraction inversion. 16th ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide (Abstract).

Palmer, D., 2006, Refraction traveltime and amplitude corrections for very near-surface inhomogeneities: Geophysical Prospecting, 54, 589–604
CrossRef |

Palmer, D., 2007, Is it time to re-engineer geotechnical seismic refraction methods? 19th ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Perth (Extended Abstract).

Palmer, D., 2008a, Is it time to re-engineer geotechnical seismic refraction methods?: First Break, 26, 69–77

Palmer, D., 2008b, Non-Uniqueness in near-surface refraction inversion. In Xu, Y. X., Xia, J. H., eds., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Wuhan, China. Science Press, Beijing., pp. 42–54.

Palmer, D., 2009a, Maximising the lateral resolution of near-surface seismic refraction methods: Mulli-Tamsa, 12, 85–90
CrossRef |

Palmer, D., 2009b, Integrating short and long wavelength time and amplitude statics: First Break, 27, 57–65

Palmer, D., 2010a, Non-uniqueness with refraction inversion – a syncline model study: Geophysical Prospecting, 58, 203–218
CrossRef |

Palmer, D., 2010b, Non-uniqueness with refraction inversion – the Mt Bulga shear zone: Geophysical Prospecting, 58, 561–575
CrossRef |

Palmer, D., 2010c, Are refraction attributes more useful than refraction tomography?: First Break, 28, 43–52

Palmer, D., 2010d, Non-uniqueness with refraction inversion – a syncline model study: 21st ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Sydney (Extended Abstract).

Palmer, D., Nikrouz, R., and Spyrou, A., 2005, Statics corrections for shallow seismic refraction data: Exploration Geophysics, 36, 7–17
CrossRef |

Palmer, D., and Shadlow, J., 2008, Integrating long and short wavelength statics with the generalized reciprocal method and the refraction convolution section: Exploration Geophysics, 39, 139–147
CrossRef |

Schuster, G. T., and Quintus-Bosz, A., 1993, Wavepath eikonal traveltime inversion: theory: Geophysics, 58, 1314–1323
CrossRef |

Stefani, J. P., 1995, Turning-ray tomography: Geophysics, 60, 1917–1929
CrossRef |

Whiteley, R. J., 2004, Shallow seismic refraction interpretation with visual interactive ray trace (VIRT) modeling: Exploration Geophysics, 35, 116–123
CrossRef |

Whiteley, R. J., and Eccleston, P. J., 2006, Comparison of shallow seismic refraction interpretation methods for regolith mapping: Exploration Geophysics, 37, 340–347
CrossRef |

Whiteley, R. J., and Leung, T. M. (undated), Mt Bulga revisited: http://rayfract.com/pub/Mt_Bulga_Revisited.pdf

Zhang, J., and Toksöz, M. N., 1998, Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography: Geophysics, 63, 1726–1737
CrossRef |

Zhu, X., Sixta, D. P., and Andstman, B. G., 1992, Tomostatics: turning-ray tomography + static corrections: The Leading Edge, 11, 15–23
CrossRef |


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013