Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Temporal and spatial patterns of soil water extraction and drought resistance among genotypes of a perennial C4 grass

Yi Zhou A , Christopher J. Lambrides A C , Matthew B. Roche B , Alan Duff B and Shu Fukai A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Qld 4072, Australia.

B The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Qld 4163, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: chris.lambrides@uq.edu.au

Functional Plant Biology 40(4) 379-392 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12270
Submitted: 13 September 2012  Accepted: 4 December 2012   Published: 11 February 2013

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate patterns of soil water extraction and drought resistance among genotypes of bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) a perennial C4 grass. Four wild Australian ecotypes (1–1, 25a1, 40–1, and 81–1) and four cultivars (CT2, Grand Prix, Legend, and Wintergreen) were examined in field experiments with rainfall excluded to monitor soil water extraction at 30–190 cm depths. In the study we defined drought resistance as the ability to maintain green canopy cover under drought. The most drought resistant genotypes (40–1 and 25a1) maintained more green cover (55–85% vs 5–10%) during water deficit and extracted more soil water (120–160 mm vs 77–107 mm) than drought sensitive genotypes, especially at depths from 50 to 110 cm, though all genotypes extracted water to 190 cm. The maintenance of green cover and higher soil water extraction were associated with higher stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate and relative water content. For all genotypes, the pattern of water use as a percentage of total water use was similar across depth and time We propose the observed genetic variation was related to different root characteristics (root length density, hydraulic conductivity, root activity) although shoot sensitivity to drying soil cannot be ruled out.

Additional keywords: drought tolerance, green couch grass, turfgrass, water use.


References

Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) ‘Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements.’ (FAO: Rome)

Baker H (1974) The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 1–24.
The evolution of weeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baldwin CM, Liu HB, McCarty LB, Luo H, Wells CE, Toler JE (2009) Impacts of altered light spectral quality on warm-season turfgrass growth under greenhouse conditions. Crop Science 49, 1444–1453.
Impacts of altered light spectral quality on warm-season turfgrass growth under greenhouse conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beard JB (1973) ‘Turfgrass: science and culture.’ (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA)

Blum A (2011) ‘Plant breeding for water-limited environments.’ (Springer: New York)

Bonos SA, Murphy JA (1999) Growth responses and performance of Kentucky bluegrass under summer stress. Crop Science 39, 770–774.
Growth responses and performance of Kentucky bluegrass under summer stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carrow RN (1996) Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the southeast: root-shoot responses. Crop Science 36, 687–694.
Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the southeast: root-shoot responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought – from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology 30, 239–264.
Understanding plant responses to drought – from genes to the whole plant.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjtVKlt7o%3D&md5=17b4b78fac11852745aa8deb5537afc3CAS |

Collino DJ, Dardanelli JL, Sereno R, Racca RW (2000) Physiological responses of argentine peanut varieties to water stress. Water uptake and water use efficiency. Field Crops Research 68, 133–142.
Physiological responses of argentine peanut varieties to water stress. Water uptake and water use efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dardanelli JL, Bachmeier OA, Sereno R, Gil R (1997) Rooting depth and soil water extraction patterns of different crops in a silty loam Haplustoll. Field Crops Research 54, 29–38.
Rooting depth and soil water extraction patterns of different crops in a silty loam Haplustoll.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dardanelli JL, Ritchie JT, Calmon M, Andriani JM, Collino DJ (2004) An empirical model for root water uptake. Field Crops Research 87, 59–71.
An empirical model for root water uptake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ervin EH, Koski AJ (1998) Drought avoidance aspects and crop coefficients of Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue turfs in the semiarid west. Crop Science 38, 788–795.
Drought avoidance aspects and crop coefficients of Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue turfs in the semiarid west.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fry J, Huang B (2004) ‘Applied turfgrass science and physiology.’ (John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA)

Gowda VRP, Henry A, Yamauchi A, Shashidhar HE, Serraj R (2011) Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Research 122, 1–13.
Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gutierrez M, Reynolds MP, Klatt AR (2010) Association of water spectral indices with plant and soil water relations in contrasting wheat genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 3291–3303.
Association of water spectral indices with plant and soil water relations in contrasting wheat genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXptVymsL4%3D&md5=c486de3285ffb35b7740012c32bb419aCAS |

Hays KL, Barber JF, Kenna MP, McCollum TG (1991) Drought avoidance mechanisms of selected bermudagrass genotypes. HortScience 26, 180–182.

Huang B, Fry JD (1999) Turfgrass evapotranspiration. Journal of Crop Production 2, 317–333.
Turfgrass evapotranspiration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huang B, Duncan RR, Carrow RN (1997) Drought-resistance mechanisms of seven warm-season turfgrasses under surface soil drying. II. Root aspects. Crop Science 37, 1863–1869.
Drought-resistance mechanisms of seven warm-season turfgrasses under surface soil drying. II. Root aspects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Karcher DE, Richardson MD, Hignight K, Rush D (2008) Drought tolerance of tall fescue populations selected for high root–shoot ratios and summer survival. Crop Science 48, 771–777.
Drought tolerance of tall fescue populations selected for high root–shoot ratios and summer survival.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kato Y, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J, Imoto H, Abe J (2007) Growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars under upland conditions with different levels of water supply 3. Root system development, soil moisture change and plant water status. Plant Production Science 10, 3–13.
Growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars under upland conditions with different levels of water supply 3. Root system development, soil moisture change and plant water status.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kearns R, Zhou Y, Fukai S, Ye C, Loch D, Godwin ID, Holton T, Innes D, Stirling H, Cao N, Jewell M, Lambrides CJ (2009) Eco-Turf: water use efficient turfgrasses from Australian biodiversity. Acta Horticulturae 829, 113–118.

Levitt J (1980) ‘Responses of plants to environmental stresses.’ (Academic Press: New York)

Lilley JM, Fukai S (1994) Effect of timing and severity of water-deficit on four diverse rice cultivars. I. Rooting pattern and soil-water extraction. Field Crops Research 37, 205–213.
Effect of timing and severity of water-deficit on four diverse rice cultivars. I. Rooting pattern and soil-water extraction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Llobet M, Vignolio OR, Save R, Biel C (2012) Above- and below-ground interactions between Lotus tenuis and Cynodon dactylon under different fertilization levels. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 92, 45–53.
Above- and below-ground interactions between Lotus tenuis and Cynodon dactylon under different fertilization levels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Monteith JL (1986) How do crops manipulate water supply and demand? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 316, 245–259.
How do crops manipulate water supply and demand?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Munns R, James RA, Sirault XRR, Furbank RT, Jones HG (2010) New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 3499–3507.
New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVert7jJ&md5=a67dee7bccdf032afecb6c53bbe5a30bCAS |

Nippert JB, Knapp AK (2007) Linking water uptake with rooting patterns in grassland species. Oecologia 153, 261–272.
Linking water uptake with rooting patterns in grassland species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nippert JB, Wieme RA, Ocheltree TW, Craine JM (2012) Root characteristics of C4 grasses limit reliance on deep soil water in tallgrass prairie. Plant and Soil 355, 385–394.
Root characteristics of C4 grasses limit reliance on deep soil water in tallgrass prairie.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xns1eksbs%3D&md5=e23178e913fda3a242092edcd1d1c33bCAS |

Qian YL, Fry JD, Upham WS (1997) Rooting and drought avoidance of warm-season turfgrasses and tall fescue in Kansas. Crop Science 37, 905–910.
Rooting and drought avoidance of warm-season turfgrasses and tall fescue in Kansas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reynolds M, Dreccer F, Trethowan R (2007) Drought-adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 177–186.
Drought-adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlOltLw%3D&md5=4ff032a04405e446ac1c230300de881fCAS |

Robertson MJ, Fukai S, Ludlow MM, Hammer GL (1993a) Water extraction by grain-sorghum in a subhumid environment. I. Analysis of the water extraction pattern. Field Crops Research 33, 81–97.
Water extraction by grain-sorghum in a subhumid environment. I. Analysis of the water extraction pattern.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robertson MJ, Fukai S, Ludlow MM, Hammer GL (1993b) Water extraction by grain-sorghum in a subhumid environment. II. Extraction in relation to root-growth. Field Crops Research 33, 99–112.
Water extraction by grain-sorghum in a subhumid environment. II. Extraction in relation to root-growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Steinke K, Chalmers D, Thomas J, White R (2011) Bermudagrass and buffalograss drought response and recovery at two soil depths. Crop Science 51, 1215–1223.
Bermudagrass and buffalograss drought response and recovery at two soil depths.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stone LR, Goodrum DE, Schlegel AJ, Jaafar MN, Khan AH (2002) Water depletion depth of grain sorghum and sunflower in the central High Plains. Agronomy Journal 94, 936–943.
Water depletion depth of grain sorghum and sunflower in the central High Plains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thomas , Fukai S, Hammer GL (1995) Growth and yield response of barley and chickpea to water stress under three environments in southeast Queensland. II. Root growth and soil water extraction pattern. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 35–48.
Growth and yield response of barley and chickpea to water stress under three environments in southeast Queensland. II. Root growth and soil water extraction pattern.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tipton JL (1984) Evaluation of three growth curve models for germination data analysis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 109, 451–454.

Turner NC (1981) Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant and Soil 58, 339–366.
Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turner NC (1996) Further progress in crop water relations. Advances in Agronomy 58, 293–338.
Further progress in crop water relations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L, Hash CT, Upadhyaya HD, Borrell AK (2011) Yield, transpiration efficiency, and water-use variations and their interrelationships in the sorghum reference collection. Crop and Pasture Science 62, 645–655.
Yield, transpiration efficiency, and water-use variations and their interrelationships in the sorghum reference collection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang Z, Goonewardene LA (2004) The use of MIXED models in the analysis of animal experiments with repeated measures data. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, 1–11.
The use of MIXED models in the analysis of animal experiments with repeated measures data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams DG, Black RA (1994) Drought response of a native and introduced Hawaiian grass. Oecologia 97, 512–519.
Drought response of a native and introduced Hawaiian grass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhou Y, Lambrides C, Kearns R, Ye C, Cao N, Fukai S (2009) Selecting for drought tolerance among Australian green couch grasses (Cynodon spp.). Crop and Pasture Science 60, 1175–1183.
Selecting for drought tolerance among Australian green couch grasses (Cynodon spp.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhou Y, Lambrides CJ, Fukai S (2013a) Drought resistance of C4 grasses under field conditions: genetic variation among a large number of bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) ecotypes collected from different climatic zones. Journal Agronomy & Crop Science in press.

Zhou Y, Lambrides CJ, Fukai S (2013b) Drought resistance of bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) ecotypes collected from different climatic zones. Environmental and Experimental Botany 85, 22–29.
Drought resistance of bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) ecotypes collected from different climatic zones.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |