Register      Login
Health Promotion Journal of Australia Health Promotion Journal of Australia Society
Journal of the Australian Health Promotion Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A cross-sectional study examining the extent of unwanted sexual attention and unhealthy intimate relationships among female university students

Kelly Hayden A , Melissa Graham A B and Greer Lamaro A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Health through Action on Social Exclusion (CHASE), School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: melissa.graham@deakin.edu.au

Health Promotion Journal of Australia 27(2) 134-139 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE15113
Submitted: 11 September 2015  Accepted: 29 January 2016   Published: 17 May 2016

Abstract

Issue addressed: Unwanted sexual attention and unhealthy intimate relationships have the potential to have serious negative health consequences. To date, there has been scant focus on these issues among university students in Australia. The aim of the current study was to describe the extent of unwanted sexual attention and unhealthy intimate relationships experienced in their lifetime by female university students aged 18–25 years.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken involving 465 female students aged 18–25 years. Students were recruited through one faculty within a Victorian university and invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire.

Results: Sixty-seven per cent (n = 312) of female students reported experiencing unwanted sexual attention in their lifetime. The most common form of unwanted sexual attention was kissing or touching over clothes (98%; n = 306). Over 43% (n = 124) of the female students reported that the experience of unwanted sexual experience occurred after their protests were ignored. Thirty per cent (n = 135) of the female students reported experiencing at least one element of an unhealthy intimate relationship.

Conclusions: The high rates of unwanted sexual attention and unhealthy intimate relationships among female university students is of concern given the negative impact such events can have on individual’s physical, emotional and social well being.

So what?: Public health and health promotion action is required to prevent female students from experiencing unwanted sexual attention and unhealthy intimate relationships, and to address the negative health and well being consequences.


References

[1]  World Health Organization (WHO)/ London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: taking action and generating evidence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

[2]  World Health Organization (WHO). Sexual health, human rights and the law. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

[3]  Crown L, Roberts LJ (2007) Against their will: young women’s nonagentic sexual experiences. J Soc Pers Relat 24, 385–405.
Against their will: young women’s nonagentic sexual experiences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Gover AR, Kaukinen C, Fox KA (2008) The relationship between violence in the family of origin and dating violence among college students. J Interpers Violence 23, 1667–93.
The relationship between violence in the family of origin and dating violence among college students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18349342PubMed |

[5]  Akyüz A, Yavan T, Şahiner G, Kılıç A (2012) Domestic violence and woman’s reproductive health: a review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav 17, 514–8.
Domestic violence and woman’s reproductive health: a review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Campbell J, Jones A, Dienemann J (2002) Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Arch Intern Med 162, 1157–63.
Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12020187PubMed |

[7]  Campbell JC (2002) Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet 359, 1331–6.
Health consequences of intimate partner violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11965295PubMed |

[8]  Brener ND, McMahon PM, Warren CW, Douglas KA (1999) Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States. J Consult Clin Psychol 67, 252–9.
Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ktFantQ%3D%3D&md5=53827da37f4f6b758f1873e54b00e112CAS | 10224736PubMed |

[9]  Champion JD, Shain RN (1998) The context of sexually transmitted disease: life histories of woman abuse. Issues Ment Health Nurs 19, 463–79.
The context of sexually transmitted disease: life histories of woman abuse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvls1WqsA%3D%3D&md5=a2b9d56c49b2b9835cdaf016ab6f181cCAS | 9782863PubMed |

[10]  McFarlane J, Malecha A, Watson K, Gist J, Batten E, Hall I, Smith S (2005) Intimate partner sexual assault against women: frequency, health consequences, and treatment outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 105, 99–108.
Intimate partner sexual assault against women: frequency, health consequences, and treatment outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15625149PubMed |

[11]  Jordan CE, Combs JL, Smith GT (2014) An exploration of sexual victimization and academic performance among college women. Trauma Violence Abuse 15, 191–200.
An exploration of sexual victimization and academic performance among college women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24452765PubMed |

[12]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. Personal safety survey, Australia, 2012. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2012.

[13]  Romans S, Forte T, Cohen MM, Du Mont J, Hyman I (2007) Who is most at risk for intimate partner violence? A Canadian population-based study. J Interpers Violence 22, 1495–514.
Who is most at risk for intimate partner violence? A Canadian population-based study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17993638PubMed |

[14]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. Personal safety survey, Australia, 2005 (4906.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2006.

[15]  Ward SK, Chapman K, Cohn E, White S, Williams K (1991) Acquaintance rape and the college social scene. Fam Relat 40, 65–71.
Acquaintance rape and the college social scene.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Ho IK, Dinh KT, Bellefontaine SA, Irving AL (2012) Sexual harassment and posttraumatic stress symptoms among Asian and white women. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma 21, 95–113.
Sexual harassment and posttraumatic stress symptoms among Asian and white women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Humphrey JA, White JW (2000) Women’s vulnerability to sexual assault from adolescence to young adulthood. J Adolesc Health 27, 419–24.
Women’s vulnerability to sexual assault from adolescence to young adulthood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FmtFSjsQ%3D%3D&md5=20bb88613db20da310fc4d8e4fb591efCAS | 11090744PubMed |

[18]  Gavey N (1991) Sexual victimization prevalence among New Zealand university students. J Consult Clin Psychol 59, 464–6.
Sexual victimization prevalence among New Zealand university students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3Mzgt1Grsw%3D%3D&md5=df394bbf24db7f59bd91641283d74023CAS | 2071732PubMed |

[19]  Chan KL, Straus MA, Brownridge DA, Tiwari A, Leung WC (2008) Prevalence of dating partner violence and suicidal ideation among male and female university students worldwide. J Midwifery Womens Health 53, 529–37.
Prevalence of dating partner violence and suicidal ideation among male and female university students worldwide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18984509PubMed |

[20]  Fass DF, Benson RI, Leggett DG (2008) Assessing prevalence and awareness of violent behaviors in the intimate partner relationships of college students using Internet sampling. J Coll Stud Psych 22, 66–75.
Assessing prevalence and awareness of violent behaviors in the intimate partner relationships of college students using Internet sampling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Straus MA (2004) Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women 10, 790–811.
Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Sullivan L. Essentials of biostatics in public health. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2008.

[23]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian health survey: users’ guide, 2011–13 (4363.0.55.001). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2011.

[24]  Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria. Are you being abused? Melbourne: Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria. 2013. Available from: http://www.dvrcv.org.au/help-advice/abuse-quiz [Verified 27 April 2016].

[25]  Miller N, Weingarten L. Creating GLBTQIA-inclusive forms: suggestions for policy and implementation. 2005. Available from: http://www.glhv.org.au/files/CreatingGLBTQIAForms.pdf [Verified 8 March 2016].

[26]  Women’s Health of Australia. Australian longitudinal study on women’s health 2012 – 1973–78 cohort survey. Women’s Health of Australia. 2012. Available from: http://www.alswh.org.au/ [Verified 12 April 2016].

[27]  Czaja R (1998) Questionnaire pretesting comes of age. Market Bull 9, 52–6.

[28]  Koss MP, Gidycz CA, Wisniewski N (1987) The scope of rape: incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. J Consult Clin Psychol 55, 162–70.
The scope of rape: incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2s7psFOgsw%3D%3D&md5=edc95b7c6fc7648f1ec589b76fc42689CAS | 3494755PubMed |

[29]  Hines DA (2007) Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: a multilevel, multinational study of university students. Arch Sex Behav 36, 403–22.
Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: a multilevel, multinational study of university students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17333324PubMed |

[30]  Zerubavel N, Messman-Moore TL (2013) Sexual victimization, fear of sexual powerlessness, and cognitive emotion dysregulation as barriers to sexual assertiveness in college women. Violence Against Women 19, 1518–37.
Sexual victimization, fear of sexual powerlessness, and cognitive emotion dysregulation as barriers to sexual assertiveness in college women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24379216PubMed |

[31]  Byers S (1996) How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? J Psychol Human Sex 8, 7–25.
How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women). A framework to underpin action to prevent violence against women. New York: UN Women Headquarters; 2015.

[33]  Bethlehem J (2010) Selection bias in web surveys. Int Stat Rev 78, 161–88.
Selection bias in web surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Van Selm M, Jankowski NW (2006) Conducting online surveys. Qual Quant 40, 435–56.
Conducting online surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |