Evaluating the economics of the Australian National Hand Hygiene Initiative

Article

<< Previous

Next >>

Contents Vol 17(1)

doi:10.1071/HI12003

Official Journal of the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control

	Search




	Advanced Search



	Journal Home

	About the Journal

	Editorial Committee

	Contacts



	Content

	Online Early

	Current Issue

	Just Accepted

	All Issues

	Special Issues

	Sample Issue



	For Authors

	General Information

	Guidelines for Authors

	Submit Article



	For Referees

	Referee Guidelines

	Review Article

	Annual Referee Index



	For Subscribers

	Subscription Prices

	Customer Service

	Print Publication Dates



	For Advertisers

e-Alerts

Subscribe to our Email Alert or

feeds for the latest journal papers.

Connect with us

Submit Article

Use the online submission system to send us your paper.

Evaluating the economics of the Australian National Hand Hygiene Initiative

Nicholas Graves ^A ^D, Adrian Barnett ^A, Katherine White ^A, Nerina Jimmieson ^B, Katie Page ^A, Megan Campbell ^A, Elizabeth Stevens ^A, Rebecca Rashleigh-Rolls ^A, Lindsay Grayson ^C and David Paterson ^B

^A School of Public Health and Institute for Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Qld 4059, Australia.
^B School of Psychology, McElwain Building, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
^C Infectious Diseases Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.
^D Corresponding author. Email: n.graves@qut.edu.au

Healthcare Infection 17(1) 5-10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/HI12003
Submitted: 16 January 2012 Accepted: 20 January 2012 Published: 5 April 2012





	PDF (358 KB) $25



	Export Citation

Print

Abstract

The National Hand Hygiene Initiative, implemented in Australia in 2009, is currently being evaluated for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness by a multidisciplinary team of researchers. Data from a wide range of sources are being harvested to address the research questions. The data are observational and appropriate statistical and economic modelling methods are being used. Decision makers will be provided with new knowledge about how hand hygiene interventions should be organised and what investment decisions are justified. This is novel research and the authors are unaware of any other evaluation of hand hygiene improvement initiatives. This paper describes the evaluation currently underway.

References

[1] Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S, Mourouga P, Sauvan V, Touveneau S, et al Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet 2000; 356: 1307–12.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[2] Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002; 51: 1–45.

[3] Schlesinger A, Paul M, Gafter-Gvili A, Rubinovitch B, Leibovici L. Infection-control interventions for cancer patients after chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2009; 9: 97–107.
| CrossRef |

[4] Rosenthal VD. Central line-associated bloodstream infections in limited resource countries: a review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49: 1899–907.
| CrossRef |

[5] Graves N, Halton KA, Robertus L. Chapter 17 Costs of healthcare associated infection. In Cruickshank M and Ferguson J, editors. Reducing harm to patients from healthcare associated infection: the role of surveillance. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia; 2008. Available online at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/prog-HAI_Surveillance [July 2008]

[6] Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uckay I, Larson E, Boyce J, Pittet . ‘My five moments for hand hygiene’: a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect 2007; 67: 9–21.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[7] Graves N, Halton K, Lairson D. Economics and preventing hospital-acquired infection: broadening the perspective. Infect Control Hosp Epidemio 2007; 28: 178–84.

[8] Graves N. Economics and preventing hospital-acquired infection. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10: 561–6.

[9] Grayson ML, Russo PL. The national hand hygiene initiative. Med J Aust 2009; 191: 420–1.

[10] Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organisational support. J Appl Psychol 1986; 71: 500–7.
| CrossRef |

[11] Roberts RR, Frutos PW, Ciavarella GC, Gussow LM, Mansah EK, Kampe LM. Distribution of fixed vs variable costs of hospital care. JAMA 1999; 281: 644–9.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[12] Beyersmann J, Gastmeier P, Wolkewitz M, Schumacher M. Nosocomial infection, length of stay, and time-dependent bias. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009; 30: 273–6.
| CrossRef |

[13] Beyersmann J, Kneib T, Schumacher M, Gastmeier P. An easy mathematical proof showed that time-dependent bias inevitably leads to biased effect estimation. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 1216–21.
| CrossRef |

[14] Dobson A and Barnett AG. An introduction to generalized linear models . Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2008.

[15] Harris A, et al Using economic evidence in reimbursement decisions for health technologies: experience of 4 countries. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2001; 1: 7–12.
| CAS |

[16] Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 1996; 312: 1215–8.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[17] Wilcox CW. Bias: the unconcious deceiver. Bloomington: Xlibris Corporation; 2011.

[18] World Health Organisation. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. World Alliance for Patient Safety. Global Patient Safety Challenge 2005–2006 “Clean care is safer care”; 2006. 33–101.

Subscriber Login

	Username: Password:

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help