Register      Login
Healthcare Infection Healthcare Infection Society
Official Journal of the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Nurses’ sharps, including needlestick, injuries in public and private healthcare facilities in New South Wales, Australia

Maya Guest A D , Ashley K. Kable A , May M. Boggess A B and Mark Friedewald C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

B School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85004, USA.

C Directorate of Clinical Governance, Central Coast Local Health District, North Sydney and Central Coast Area Health Service, Gosford, NSW 2250, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: maya.guest@newcastle.edu.au

Healthcare Infection 19(2) 65-75 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI13044
Submitted: 15 October 2013  Accepted: 13 January 2014   Published: 7 May 2014

Abstract

Background: The aim of this paper is to determine factors associated with sharps-related injury rates in nurses by analysing the combined data from two state-wide cross-sectional studies of nurses and comparing rates between public and private sectors and between different nurse practice areas in NSW.

Methods: The data from two studies conducted in 2006 and 2007 were combined for 44 similar data items and for similar nurse participants (registered nurses, registered midwives and enrolled nurses). Both studies had recruited nurses from membership of the NSW Nurses’ Association. Data for 256 and 1100 participants respectively were combined for this comparative analysis.

Results: The sharps-related annual injury rate was 7.2% (95% CI: 5.9, 8.7). It was significantly higher in operating theatres, renal, mental health and paediatric practice areas in private compared with public facilities (17.9% versus 5.2%). Positive aspects of sharps safety practices included: 90% of nurses reported their injuries, were aware of processes required for dealing with sharps injuries and found their managers to be approachable. Areas for improvement included the provision of information about persons responsible for follow-up (21% unsure), increased provision of safety-engineered medical devices (SEMDs) (50% not available), decreased provision of non-SEMDs (75% available) and a focus on the highly-resistant practice of recapping needles (35% report recapping non-SEMDs).

Conclusions: There are significant differences in sharps-related injuries between public and private facilities. Opportunities exist to improve safety practices across various nursing practice environments.

Additional keywords: health and safety, healthcare-acquired infection, needlestick injuries, nursing, occupational exposure, occupational health.


References

[1]  Murphy CL. The serious and ongoing issue of needlestick in Australian healthcare settings. Collegian 2013; In press.
The serious and ongoing issue of needlestick in Australian healthcare settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Anon . Needlestick transmission of HTLV-III from a patient infected in Africa. Lancet 1984; 2 1376–7.

[3]  Alter MJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13 2436–41.
| 17552026PubMed |

[4]  Baldo V, Floreani A, Dal Vecchio L, Cristofoletti M, Carletti M, Majori S, et al Occupational risk of blood-borne viruses in healthcare workers: a 5-year surveillance program. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23 325–7.
Occupational risk of blood-borne viruses in healthcare workers: a 5-year surveillance program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12083236PubMed |

[5]  Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5 558–67.
Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16122679PubMed |

[6]  Daniels D, Grytdal S, Wasley A. Surveillance for acute viral hepatitis - United States, 2007. MMWR Surveill Summ 2009; 58 1–27.
| 19478727PubMed |

[7]  EPINet Sharps Injury and Blood and Body Fluid Exposure Surveillance Research Group. International Healthcare Worker Safety Center. EPINet Report: Needlestick and Sharp-Object Injuries for 2011. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia; 2012.

[8]  Ball J, Pike G. Needlestick Injury in 2008. Results from a survey of RCN members. London, UK: Royal College of Nursing; 2008.

[9]  Whitby RM, McLaws ML. Hollow-bore needlestick injuries in a tertiary teaching hospital: epidemiology, education and engineering. Med J Aust 2002; 177 418–22.
| 12381250PubMed |

[10]  Peng B, Tully PJ, Boss K, Hiller JE. Sharps injury and body fluid exposure among health care workers in an Australian tertiary hospital. Asia Pac J Public Health 2008; 20 139–47.
Sharps injury and body fluid exposure among health care workers in an Australian tertiary hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  NSW Health. Environmental Scan of Sharps Safety in the NSW Public Health System. North Sydney, NSW: NSW Health; 2007.

[12]  Guest M, Kable A, McLeod M. A survey of sharps including needlestick injuries in nurses in New South Wales, Australia. Healthc Infect 2010; 15 77–83.
A survey of sharps including needlestick injuries in nurses in New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Kable AK, Guest M, McLeod M. Organizational risk management and nurses’ perceptions of workplace risk associated with sharps including needlestick injuries in nurses in New South Wales, Australia. Nurs Health Sci 2011; 13 246–54.
| 21615655PubMed |

[14]  Landen DD, Hendricks S. Effect of recall on reporting of at-work injuries. Public Health Rep 1995; 110 350–4.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzjsVGmug%3D%3D&md5=9e8a85ccefefe35affbba90e6b22c5bcCAS | 7610229PubMed |

[15]  Zwerling C, Sprince NL, Wallace RB, Davis CS, Whitten PS, Heeringa SG. Effect of recall period on the reporting of occupational injuries among older workers in the Health and Retirement Study. Am J Ind Med 1995; 28 583–90.
Effect of recall period on the reporting of occupational injuries among older workers in the Health and Retirement Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK287is1arsA%3D%3D&md5=9a7e2ace0db69131dd734c56a44d2774CAS | 8561168PubMed |

[16]  Warner M, Schenker N, Heinen MA, Fingerhut LA. The effects of recall on reporting injury and poisoning episodes in the National Health Interview Survey. Inj Prev 2005; 11 282–7.
The effects of recall on reporting injury and poisoning episodes in the National Health Interview Survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrivFCjsg%3D%3D&md5=48b065d212649059b9c88f52354eec7bCAS | 16203836PubMed |

[17]  Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Klocinski JL. Hospital nurses’ occupational exposure to blood: prospective, retrospective, and institutional reports. Am J Ind Med 1997; 87 103–7.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7ovVOjuw%3D%3D&md5=e77172b82c72087da4adb4dd9c5df274CAS |

[18]  Moshiro C, Heuch I, Astrom AN, Setel P, Kvale G. Effect of recall on estimation of non-fatal injury rates: a community based study in Tanzania. Inj Prev 2005; 11 48–52.
Effect of recall on estimation of non-fatal injury rates: a community based study in Tanzania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FmtlClsw%3D%3D&md5=53634b10f9539087a6ab556ad8c412efCAS | 15691990PubMed |

[19]  Gabbe BJ, Finch CF, Bennell KL, Wajswelner H. How valid is a self reported 12 month sports injury history? Br J Sports Med 2003; 37 545–7.
How valid is a self reported 12 month sports injury history?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srosVWhtw%3D%3D&md5=c69233237e61ccc818f9516b7f400979CAS | 14665599PubMed |

[20]  Prohaska V, Brown NR, Belli RF. Forward telescoping: the question matters. Memory 1998; 6 455–65.
Forward telescoping: the question matters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fks1Gnsw%3D%3D&md5=f899ae23aace637f0d50b0a17953064eCAS | 9829101PubMed |

[21]  Jinks C, Lewis M, Ong BN, Croft P. A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care. 1. validity and reliability. Rheumatology 2001; 40 528–36.
A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care. 1. validity and reliability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3nsl2gtA%3D%3D&md5=2d898d1aef0da0c6340b1a9d2c0ea4ebCAS | 11371661PubMed |

[22]  StataCorp LP. Stata MP, version 12.2. College Station, USA: Stata Press; 2012.

[23]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian hospital statistics 2010–11. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=10737421633 [verified January 2014].

[24]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Workbook for Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating a Sharps Injury Prevention Program. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/sharpssafety/index.html [verified January 2014].

[25]  Perry J, Jagger J. FAQs about implementing safety devices. Nursing 2005; 35 74–6.
FAQs about implementing safety devices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16205283PubMed |

[26]  Phipps W, Honghong W, Min Y, Burgess J, Pellico L, Watkins CW, et al Risk of medical sharps injuries among Chinese nurses. Am J Infect Control 2002; 30 277–82.
Risk of medical sharps injuries among Chinese nurses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12163861PubMed |

[27]  Bilski B. Needlestick Injuries in Nurses: The Poznan Study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2005; 18 251–4.
| 16411563PubMed |

[28]  Clarke SP, Schubert M, Korner T. Sharp-device injuries to hospital staff nurses in 4 countries. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28 473–8.
Sharp-device injuries to hospital staff nurses in 4 countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17385155PubMed |

[29]  Hunt J, Murphy C. Measurement of nursing staff occupational exposures in the operating suite following introduction of a prevention programme. Australian Infection Control 2004; 9 57–63.

[30]  Jagger J, Perry J, Gomaa A, Phillips EK. The impact of U.S. policies to protect healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens: the critical role of safety-engineered devices. J Infect Public Health 2008; 1 62–71.
The impact of U.S. policies to protect healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens: the critical role of safety-engineered devices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20701847PubMed |

[31]  US Congress. Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act of 2000. Available from:http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-106publ430/html/PLAW-106publ430.htm [verified January 2014].

[32]  Smith DR, Choe MA, Jeong JS, Jeon MY, Chae YR, An GJ. Epidemiology of needlestick and sharps injuries among professional Korean nurses. J Prof Nurs 2006; 22 359–66.
Epidemiology of needlestick and sharps injuries among professional Korean nurses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17141720PubMed |

[33]  New South Wales Health. Policy Directive 2005_311: HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C – Management of Health Care Workers Potentially Exposed. Available from: http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/PD/2005/pdf/PD2005_311.pdf [verified January 2014].

[34]  Cutter J, Gammon J. Review of standard precautions and sharps management in the community. Br J Community Nurs 2007; 12 54–60.
| 17363868PubMed |

[35]  Lee LK, Noor Hassim I. Implication of the prevalence of needlestick injuries in a general hospital in Malaysia and its risk in clinical practice. Environ Health Prev Med 2005; 10 33–41.
Implication of the prevalence of needlestick injuries in a general hospital in Malaysia and its risk in clinical practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21432161PubMed |

[36]  Burke S, Madan I. Contamination incidents among doctors and midwives: reasons for non-reporting and knowledge of risks. Occup Med 1997; 47 357–60.
Contamination incidents among doctors and midwives: reasons for non-reporting and knowledge of risks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2svmvVGmsA%3D%3D&md5=5c897272a60229772fd74ee7ab21140fCAS |

[37]  Knight VM, Bodsworth NJ. Perceptions and practice of universal blood and body fluid precautions by registered nurses at a major Sydney teaching hospital. J Adv Nurs 1998; 27 746–51.
Perceptions and practice of universal blood and body fluid precautions by registered nurses at a major Sydney teaching hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jsleitw%3D%3D&md5=62e26be44aaa46544d0815afab44bc0bCAS | 9578204PubMed |

[38]  Smith DR, Smyth W, Leggat PA, Wang RS. Needlestick and sharps injuries among nurses in a tropical Australian hospital. Int J Nurs Pract 2006; 12 71–7.
Needlestick and sharps injuries among nurses in a tropical Australian hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16529593PubMed |

[39]  Voide C, Darling K, Kenfak-Foguena A, Cavassini M, Lazor-Blanchet C. Underreporting of needlestick and sharps injuries among healthcare workers in a Swiss University Hospital. Swiss Med Wkly 2012; 142 w13523
| 22328010PubMed |

[40]  New South Wales Health. Infection Control Policy. Available from: http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/pd/2007/pdf/PD2007_036.pdf verified January 2014].

[41]  Doebbeling BN, Vaughn TE, McCoy K, Beekmann SE, Woolson RF, Ferguson KJ, et al Percutaneous Injury, Blood Exposure, and Adherence to Standard Precautions: Are Hospital-Based Health Care Providers Still at Risk? Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37 1006–13.
Percutaneous Injury, Blood Exposure, and Adherence to Standard Precautions: Are Hospital-Based Health Care Providers Still at Risk?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14523763PubMed |

[42]  Medical Technology Association of Australia. Value of technology: needlestick and sharps injuries and safety-engineered medical devices Available from: http://www.mtaa.org.au/docs/vot/vot-needlestick-and-sharpscopytosend.pdf?sfvrsn=0 [verified January 2014].

[43]  National Health & Medical Research Council. Australian Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare. Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/cd33_infection_control_healthcare.pdf [verified January 2014].