Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Plankton succession and assemblage structure in two neighbouring littoral ecosystems in the north-west Mediterranean Sea

J.-L. Jamet A C , N. Jean B , G. Bogé A , S. Richard A and D. Jamet A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Université du Sud Toulon-Var, Equipe de Biologie des Milieux Aquatiques, Laboratoire PROTEE, E. A. 3819. B. P. 20132. F-83957 La Garde cedex, France.

B Institut National des Sciences et Techniques de la Mer, CNAM/INTECHMER Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches Marines, E. A. 3202 B. P. 324. F-50103 Cherbourg cedex, France.

C Corresponding author. Email: jamet@univ-tln.fr

Marine and Freshwater Research 56(1) 69-83 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04102
Submitted: 17 May 2004  Accepted: 25 November 2004   Published: 4 February 2005

Abstract

We studied seasonal variations in bacterial abundance and succession in phyto- and zooplankton assemblages (particularly small taxa) in two neighbouring shallow bays (near Toulon, Mediterranean Sea, France): Little Bay (polluted, eutrophic), and Niel Bay (less polluted, oligotrophic). In Little Bay, bacteria developed in northern spring and phytoplankton (Dinophyceae > 20 µm) in late northern winter–early spring. Zooplankton levels peaked at the end of northern spring and in autumn; this community was dominated by Oithona nana. In Niel Bay, bacterial levels peaked during northern spring and autumn. Phytoplankton (Dinophyceae, Bacillariophyceae) abundance was low and only peaked in June. Zooplankton levels peaked in northern mid-summer. Little Bay was influenced more by the land and by human activities than by the sea. Seasonal factors (e.g. water temperature) and sudden influences (e.g. rain and, indirectly, Mistral wind) may have modified the succession of the plankton communities in this bay. Successions did not follow Margalef’s model and the classical scheme for zooplankton. Conversely, Niel Bay functioning and plankton assemblages were most influenced by the physical environment of the sea than by the land or by human activities. Successions were closely related to the classical scheme of the Mediterranean Sea.

Extra keywords: bacteria, ecology, marine ecosystem, phytoplankton, pollution, zooplankton.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Institut Universitaire de Technologie of the Université du Sud Toulon-Var (Director of the IUT, Prof. B. Rossetto) and the Département de Génie Biologique for technical support (Chief of Department, Prof. M. Camail). The authors are also indebt to Dr C. Le Poupon and J.-M. Ginoux for their scientific advices. They also thank the two anonymous referees for suggestions that improved the manuscript.


References

Amblard, C. (1988). Seasonal succession and strategies of phytoplankton development in two lakes of different trophy. Journal of Plankton Research 10, 1189–1208.
Belin C., Beliaeff B., Raffin B., Rabia M., and Ibanez F. (1995). Phytoplankton time-series data of the French phytoplankton monitoring network: toxic and dominant species. In ‘Harmful Marine Algal Blooms’. (Eds P. Lassus, G. Arzul, E. Erard, P. Gentien and C. Marcaillou.) pp. 771–776. (Technique et Documentation-Lavoisier, Intercept Ltd: Paris.)

Calbet, A. , Garrido, S. , Saiz, E. , Alcaraz, M. , and Duarte, C. M. (2001). Annual zooplankton succession in coastal NW Mediterranean waters: the importance of the smaller size fractions. Journal of Plankton Research 23, 319–331.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Haury L. R., McGowan J. A., and Wiebe P. H. (1978). Patterns and processes in the time-space scales of plankton distributions. In ‘Spatial Patterns in Plankton Communities’. (Ed. J. H. Steele.) pp. 277–327. (Plenum Press: New York.)

IFREMER (1993). ‘Qualité du Milieu Marin Littoral.’ (IFREMER Publishing: Paris.)

Jacques, G. (1968). Aspects quantitatifs du phytoplancton de Banyuls sur Mer (Golf du Lion). III – Diatomées et Dinoflagellés de juin 1965 à juin 1968. Vie et Milieu 20, 91–126.
Jacques G., and Tréguer P. (1986). ‘Ecosystèmes Pélagiques Marins.’ Collection d’Ecologie no. 19. (Masson Publishing: Paris.)

Jamet, J. L. , and Ferec-Corbel, A. S. (1996). Seasonal variations of the zooplankton community in a littoral marine ecosystem: Toulon Bay (Var, France). Marine Life 6, 15–20.
Margalef R. (1958). Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton. In ‘Perspectives in Marine Biology’. (Ed. A. A. Buzzati-Traverso.) pp. 323–349. (California University Press: Los Angeles, CA.)

Margalef R. (1968). ‘Perspectives in Ecological Theory.’ Chicago Series Biology. (Chicago University Press: Chicago, IL.)

Odum, E. P. (1969). The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164, 262–270.
PubMed | Shannon C. R., and Weaver W. (1949). ‘The Mathematical Theory of Communication.’ (University of Illinois: Urbana, IL.)

Siokou-Frangou, I. (1996). Zooplankton annual cycle in a Mediterranean coastal area. Journal of Plankton Research 18, 203–223.


Strathmann, R. R. (1967). Estimating the organic carbon content of phytoplankton from cell volume or plasma volume. Limnology and Oceanography 12, 4111–4118.


Travers, M. (1971). Diversité du microplancton du Golfe de Marseille en 1964. Marine Biology 8, 308–343.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turpin, D. H. , and Harrison, P. J. (1979). Limiting nutrient patchiness and its role in phytoplankton ecology. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 39, 151–166.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Underwood, A. J. (1996). Detection, interpretation, prediction and management of environmental disturbances: some roles for experimental marine ecology. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 200, 1–27.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Utermöhl, H. (1958). Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Mitteilungen der internationale Vereinigung für Limnologie 9, 1–38.


Yamazi, I. (1964). Structure of the netted plankton communities in the inner area of the Gulf of Naples in September 1962. Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli 34, 98–136.