Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF04202
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 56(2)

Subtidal assemblages associated with a geotextile reef in south-east Queensland, Australia

Rhys A. Edwards A B and Stephen D. A. Smith A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Environmental Science and Natural Resources Management, University of New England, National Marine Science Centre, PO Box J321, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: redwards@nmsc.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 56(2) 133-142 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04202
Submitted: 29 July 2004  Accepted: 1 March 2005   Published: 12 April 2005

Abstract

In marine habitats, the use of geotextile materials as a ‘soft-engineering’ solution is increasingly being considered as an alternative to hard structures. However, very little is known about biological assemblages that develop on geotextile structures. This study provides the first ecological comparison of subtidal assemblages between Narrowneck Artificial Reef (NAR), a geotextile reef in south-east Queensland, Australia, and three nearby natural reefs. Benthic community structure, fish assemblages and habitat complexity were compared between reef types using an asymmetrical design. Although natural reefs supported distinct biotic assemblages, as a class, these reefs differed significantly from NAR. The artificial reef was dominated by macroalgae and supported fewer benthic categories, whereas the natural reefs were characterised by a diverse range of sessile invertebrates. Benthic and demersal fish assemblages were less diverse on NAR, but pelagic fish assemblages were similar on both reef types. The substratum of NAR was less complex than that of the natural reefs; this physical variable was correlated with some of the differences in benthic communities and benthic and demersal fish assemblages. It is likely that the key determinants of the biotic patterns observed in this study are interactions between the age of NAR and the physical properties of geotextile substratum.

Extra keywords: artificial reefs, benthic invertebrates, complexity, fish assemblages, geotextiles.


Acknowledgments

Soil Filters Australia, Pty Ltd (Qld.) provided the majority of funding for this project. Thanks to the Artificial Reef Team (Andrew Carroll, Matt Harrison and Michael Rule) for their assistance with fieldwork at the Gold Coast and to the other postgraduate students and staff at the National Marine Science Centre who offered assistance at the various stages of the study. Kathryn James produced Fig. 1; Fig. 2 provided courtesy of Soil Filters Australia, Pty Ltd. This work formed part of a B.Sc. (Hons) project by the first author.


References

Abelson, A. , and Shlesinger, Y. (2002). Comparison of the development of coral and fish communities on rock-aggregated artificial reefs at Eilat, Red Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, S122–S126.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Birkeland C. (1977). The importance of rate of biomass accumulation in early successional stages of benthic communities to the survival of coral recruits. In ‘Proceedings of the 3rd International Coral Reef Symposium, Miami’, Vol. 1. (Ed. D. L. Taylor.) pp. 15–21. (Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami: Miami, FL.)

Birkeland C., Rowley D., and Randall R. H. (1982). Coral recruitment patterns at Guam. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th International Coral Reef Symposium, Manila’. Vol. 2. (Ed. E. D. Gomez.) pp. 339–344. (The Centre: Quezon City, Philippines.)

Bohnsack, J. A. (1989). Are high densities of fishes at artificial reefs the result of habitat limitation or behavioural preference? Bulletin of Marine Science 44(2), 631–645.
Borrero J. C., and Nelsen C. (2003). Results of a comprehensive monitoring program at Pratte’s Reef. In ‘Proceedings of the 3rd International Artificial Surfing Reef Symposium, Raglan, New Zealand, 23–25 June 2003’. (Eds K. P. Black and S. T. Mead.) pp. 83–98.

Brock, R. E. (1994). Beyond fisheries enhancement: artificial reefs and ecotourism. Bulletin of Marine Science 55(2–3), 1181–1188.
Burgess S. C., Black K. P., Mead S. T., and Kingsford M. J. (2003). Considerations for artificial surfing reefs as habitat for marine organisms. In ‘Proceedings of the 3rd International Artificial Surfing Reef Symposium, Raglan, New Zealand, 23–25 June 2003’. (Eds K. P. Black and S. T. Mead.) pp. 289–302.

Chabanet, P. , Ralambondrainy, H. , Amanieu, M. , Faure, G. , and Galzin, R. (1997). Relationships between coral reef substrata and fish. Coral Reefs 16, 93–102.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Clarke K. R., and Gorley R. N. (2001). ‘PRIMER v5: User manual/Tutorial.’ (PRIMER-E Ltd: Plymouth.)

Clarke, R. D. (1977). Habitat distribution and species diversity of chaetodontid and pomacentrid fishes near Bimini, Bahamas. Marine Biology 40, 277–289.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | English S., Wilkinson C., and Baker V. (1997). ‘Survey Manual for Tropical Marine Resources.’ 2nd edn. (Australian Institute of Marine Science: Townsville.)

Fabi, G. , Luccarni, F. , Panfili, M. , Solustri, C. , and Spagnolo, A. (2002). Effects of an artificial reef on the surrounding soft-bottom community (central Adriatic Sea). ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, S343–S349.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | GCCC (1997). Chapter 2: Description. In ‘Gold Coast City Council State of the Environment Report’. Gold Coast City Council.

Gillanders, B. M. , and Kingsford, M. J. (1998). Influence of habitat on size structure of a large temperate-reef fish, Acherodus viridis (Pisces: Labridae). Marine Biology 132, 503–514.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Halford A. R., and Thompson A. A. (1994). Visual census surveys of reef fish: long-term monitoring of the Great Barrier Reef, standard operational procedure number 3. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville.

Hixon, M. A. (1998). Population dynamics of coral-reef fishes: controversial concepts and hypotheses. Australian Journal of Ecology 23, 192–201.
Page C., Coleman G., Ninio R., and Osborne K. (2001). Surveys of benthic reef communities using underwater video. Long-term monitoring of the Great Barrier Reef, standard operational procedure number 2. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville.

Pickering, H. , and Whitmarsh, D. (1997). Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the ‘attraction versus production’ debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fisheries Research 31, 39–59.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ranasinghe R., Hacking N., and Evans P. (2001). Multi-functional surf breaks: a review. Centre for Natural Resources, NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation, Sydney.

Relini, G. , Relini, M. , Torchia, G. , and Palandri, G. (2002). Ten years of censuses of fish fauna on the Loano artificial reef. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, S132–S137.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Seaman W.Jr (2000). ‘Artificial Reef Evaluation: With Application to Natural Marine Habitats.’ (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

Sherman, R. L. , Gilliam, D. S. , and Spieler, R. E. (2002). Artificial reef design: void space, complexity and attractants. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, S196–S200.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Smith S. D. A., and Edgar R. J. (1999). Description and comparison of benthic community structure within the Solitary Islands Marine Park. University of New England, Armidale.

Tomczak M., and Godfrey J. S. (1994). Pacific Ocean. In ‘Regional Oceanography: An Introduction’. pp. 113–147. (Pergamon Publications: Oxford, UK.)

Vance, R. R. (1988). Ecological succession and the climax community on a marine subtidal rock wall. Marine Ecology Progress Series 48, 125–136.
Zann L. P. (2000). State of the Marine Environment Report for Australia: Technical Summary. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.