Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The influence of sex and maturity on the diet, mouth morphology and dentition of the Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni

David Mark Powter A B , William Gladstone A and Margaret Platell A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Ourimbah Campus, University of Newcastle, PO Box 127, Ourimbah, NSW 2258, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: david.powter@newcastle.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 61(1) 74-85 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09021
Submitted: 3 February 2009  Accepted: 9 June 2009   Published: 29 January 2010

Abstract

Dietary studies are essential for an understanding of elasmobranch ecology and their role in marine ecosystems. The diet, head morphology and dentition of Heterodontus portusjacksoni, an abundant, epibenthic shark in the coastal waters of temperate eastern Australia, were examined in 2004–2005. The stomach contents of the juvenile, subadult and adult stages of 136 males and 100 females were examined. Diets were broad (32 prey taxa), but dominated by molluscs, teleosts and cephalopods. Analyses of stomach contents data demonstrated that diet differed significantly by ontogenetic stage, but not by sex. Juveniles and subadults consumed mainly benthic infauna and epifauna, with subadults ingesting greater amounts of diogenid crustaceans, and adult diets dominated by demersal/pelagic prey. Trophic level differed ontogenetically, from secondary consumers as juveniles and subadults to tertiary consumers as adults. The mainly tricuspidate juvenile dentition changed with maturity to a greater proportion of large molariform distal teeth, whereas the snout and jaw lengthened and broadened. Adult males retained a greater proportion of anterior S-family teeth than females, which was most likely related to copulation. The ontogenetic variation in dietary composition, facilitated by differences in dentition and mouth morphology, demonstrated that dietary resources were partitioned ontogenetically.

Additional keywords: durophagous, elasmobranch, feeding, ontogeny.


Acknowledgements

The authors thank Australian Geographic and Project A.WAR.E. (PADI Asia Pacific) for financial assistance with this research. Special thanks to Brett Bollinger (commercial fisher) for his cooperation and assistance in obtaining sharks and staff of the Australian Museum for assistance in identifying prey organisms. This manuscript was greatly improved by critical comments from three anonymous reviewers. All work was conducted under the University of Newcastle Ethics Approval 804 0602 and NSW Fisheries Scientific Collection Permit P02/0042 and renewals and complied with Australian law.


References

Alonso, M. K. , Crespo, E. A. , Garcia, N. C. , Pedraza, S. N. , Mariotti, P. A. , and Mora, N. J. (2002). Fishery and ontogenetic driven changes in the diet of the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias, in Patagonian waters, Argentina. Environmental Biology of Fishes 63, 193–202.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Clarke K. R., and Gorley R. N. (2001). ‘PRIMER v5: User Manual/tutorial.’ (PRIMER-E Ltd: Plymouth, UK.)

Clarke K. R., and Warwick R. M. (2001). ‘Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation.’ (PRIMER-E Ltd: Plymouth, UK.)

Compagno L. J. V. (2002). ‘Sharks of the World. An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Shark Species Known to Date. Volume 2. Bullhead, Mackerel and Carpet Sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes).’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.)

Cortés, E. (1999). Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks. ICES Journal of Marine Science 56, 707–717.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ferry L. A., and Cailliet G. M. (1996). Sample size and data analysis: are we characterizing and comparing diet properly? In ‘Feeding Ecology and Nutrition in Fish’. (Eds D. Mackinley and K. Shearer.) pp. 70–81. (American Fisheries Society Symposium: San Francisco, CA.)

Gelsleichter, J. , Musick, J. A. , and Nichols, S. (1999). Food habits of the smooth dogfish, Mustelus canis, dusky shark, Carcharhinus obscurus, Atlantic sharpnose shark, Rhizoprionondon terraenovae, and the sand tiger, Carcharias taurus, from the northwest Atlantic Ocean. Environmental Biology of Fishes 54, 205–217.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Heithaus M. R. (2004). Predator-prey interactions. In ‘Biology of Sharks and their Relatives’. (Eds J. C. Carrier, J. A. Musick and M. R. Heithaus.) pp. 487–522. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

Huber, D. R. , Eason, T. G. , Hueter, R. E. , and Motta, P. J. (2005). Analysis of the bite force and mechanical design of the feeding mechanism of the durophagous horn shark Heterodontus portusjacksoni. The Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 3553–3571.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Last P. R., and Stevens J. D. (1994). ‘Sharks and Rays of Australia.’ (CSIRO: Melbourne.)

Marshall, L. J. , White, W. T. , and Potter, I. C. (2007). Reproductive biology and diet of the southern fiddler ray, Trygonorrhina fasciata (Batoidea: Rhinobatidae), an important trawl bycatch species. Marine and Freshwater Research 58, 104–115.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McLaughlin R. H. (1969). The ecology of heterodont sharks. PhD Thesis, University of New South Wales, Australia.

McLaughlin, R. H. , and O’Gower, A. K. (1971). Life history and underwater studies of a heterodont shark. Ecological Monographs 41, 271–289.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Motta P. J. (2004). Prey capture behavior and feeding mechanics of elasmobranchs. In ‘Biology of Sharks and their Relatives’. (Eds J. C. Carrier, J. A. Musick and M. R. Heithaus.) pp. 165–202. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

Motta, P. J. , and Wilga, C. D. (2001). Advances in the study of feeding behaviors, mechanisms, and mechanics of sharks. Environmental Biology of Fishes 60, 131–156.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Powter D. M. (2006). Conservation biology of the Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni, in New South Wales. PhD thesis, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Powter, D. M. , and Gladstone, W. (2008a). The reproductive biology and ecology of the Port Jackson shark Heterodontus portusjacksoni in the coastal waters of eastern Australia. Journal of Fish Biology 72, 2615–2633.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Preti A., Smith S. E., and Ramon D. E. (2001). ‘Feeding Habits of the Common Thresher Shark (Alopias vulpinus) Sampled from the California-based Drift Gillnet Fishery, 1998–1999.’ (California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations: La Jolla, USA.)

Reif, W. E. (1976). Morphogenesis, pattern formation and function of the dentition of Heterodontus (Selachii). Zoomorphology 83, 1–47.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sokal R. R., and Rohlf F. J. (2003). ‘Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research.’ (W.H. Freeman and Company: New York.)

Somerfield, P. J. , and Clarke, K. R. (1997). A comparison of some methods commonly used for the collection of sublittoral sediments and their associated fauna. Marine Environmental Research 43, 145–156.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Strong W. R. (1989). Behavioural ecology of horn sharks, Heterodontus francisci, at Santa Catalina Island, California, with emphasis on patterns of space utilization. MSc thesis, California State University, Long Beach, USA.

Summers, A. P. , Ketcham, R. A. , and Rowe, T. (2004). Structure and function of the horn shark (Heterodontus francisci) cranium through ontogeny: development of a hard prey specialist. Journal of Morphology 260, 1–12.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Wetherbee B. M., and Cortés E. (2004). Food consumption and feeding habits. In ‘Biology of Sharks and their Relatives’. (Eds J. C. Carrier, J. A. Musick and M. R. Heithaus.) pp. 225–246. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

White, W. T. , Platell, M. E. , and Potter, I. C. (2004). Comparisons between the diets of four abundant species of elasmobranchs in a subtropical embayment: implications for resource partitioning. Marine Biology 144, 439–448.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |