CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Marine and Freshwater Research   
Marine and Freshwater Research
Journal Banner
  Advances in the aquatic sciences
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Virtual Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review an Article
Referee Guidelines
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
Library Recommendation

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 65(10)

Selecting priority conservation areas based on zooplankton diversity: the case of Mediterranean wetlands

Juan Diego Gilbert A, Inmaculada de Vicente C, Raquel Jiménez-Melero A B, Gema Parra A B and Francisco Guerrero A B D

A Departamento de Biología Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecología, University of Jaén, Campus de Las Lagunillas, s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
B Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias de la Tierra, University of Jaén, Campus de las Lagunillas, s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
C Departamento de Ecología, University of Granada, Campus de Fuentenueva, s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.
D Corresponding author. Email: fguerre@ujaen.es

Marine and Freshwater Research 65(10) 857-871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MF13143
Submitted: 6 June 2013  Accepted: 19 December 2013   Published: 4 July 2014

PDF (803 KB) $25
 Export Citation

A set of Mediterranean wetlands has been studied in order to identify priority areas for conservation using zooplankton assemblages. We also measure the degree of nestedness to determine the best strategy for conservation of zooplankton diversity. The present study was conducted in 29 wetlands located in the south-east of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain). Two complementary approaches were used, cluster analysis and parsimony analysis of endemicity (PAE), with a presence–absence data matrix, in order to group wetlands as a function of zooplankton composition. To select conservation areas, four different criteria were used: species richness; exclusive species occurrences; the number of wetlands in which species appeared; and phylogenetic diversity. The results showed the existence of three different zones (subgroups of wetlands). Using the same method, a significant nestedness among wetlands was also observed independently of the method used to group them. The conservation proposal included 98% of the total species and 41.4% of the studied wetlands. This work confirms that zooplankton assemblages are essential for making wetland conservation decisions and for the identification of areas with connectivity (fluxes of species) in which efforts should be more intense to preserve their biodiversity.

Additional keywords: crustaceans, ponds, wetland preservation.


Almeida-Neto, M., Guimarães, P., Guimarães, P. R., Loyola, R. D., and Ulrico, W. (2008). A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos 117, 1227–1239.
CrossRef |

Alonso, M. (1996). Fauna Ibérica. Crustacea, Branchiopoda. (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales – CSIC: Madrid).

Alonso, M. (1998). Las lagunas de la España Peninsular. Limnetica 15, 1–176.

Angeler, D. G., Viedma, O., Sánchez-Carrillo, S., and Álvarez-Cobelas, M. (2008). Conservation issues of temporary wetland Branchiopoda (Anostraca, Notostraca: Crustacea) in a semiarid agricultural landscape: what spatial scales are relevant? Biological Conservation 141, 1224–1234.
CrossRef |

Atmar, W., and Patterson, B. D. (1993). The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96, 373–382.
CrossRef |

Badosa, A. (2007). Limnological characteristics and zooplankton community structure of Mediterranean coastal lagoons undergoing restoration. PhD Thesis, University of Girona, Girona.

Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J., and Olesen, J. M. (2003). The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 9383–9387.
CrossRef | CAS | PubMed |

Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., and Olesen, J. M. (2006). Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312, 431–433.
CrossRef | CAS | PubMed |

Baselga, A. (2010). Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19, 134–143.
CrossRef |

Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A., and Wilson, J. D. (2003). Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 182–188.
CrossRef |

Boix, D., Gascón, S., Sala, J., Martinoy, M., Gifre, J., and Quintana, X. D. (2005). A new index of water quality assessment in Mediterranean wetlands based on crustacean and insect assemblages: the case of Catalunya (NE Iberian peninsula). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15, 635–651.
CrossRef |

Boix, D., Gascón, S., Sala, J., Badosa, A., Brucet, S., López-Flores, R., Martinoy, M., Gifre, J., and Quintana, X. D. (2008). Patterns of composition and species richness of crustaceans and aquatic insects along environmental gradients in Mediterranean water bodies. Hydrobiologia 597, 53–69.
CrossRef |

Bremer, K. (1994). Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295–304.
CrossRef |

Brinson, M. M., and Álvarez, A. I. (2002). Temperate freshwater wetlands: types, status, and threats. Environmental Conservation 29, 115–133.
CrossRef |

Cavieres, L. A., Mihoc, M., Marticorena, A., Marticorena, C., Matthei, O., and Squeo, F. A. (2001). Determinación de áreas prioritarias para la conservación: análisis de parsimonia de endemismos (PAE) en la flora de la IV Región de Coquimbo. In ‘Libro rojo de la flora nativa y de los sitios prioritarios para su conservación: Región de Coquimbo’. (Eds F. A. Squeo, G. Arancio and J. R. Gutiérrez) pp. 159–170. (Ediciones Universidad de La Serena: La Serena).

Clarke, K. R., and Warwick, R. M. (2001). Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 2nd Edn. (PRIMER-E: Plymouth).

Connell, J. H. (1978). Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199, 1302–1310.
CrossRef | CAS | PubMed |

Cook, R. R., and Quinn, J. F. (1995). The influence of colonization in nested species subsets. Oecologia 102, 413–424.
CrossRef |

De Stasio, B. T. (1989). The Seed Bank of a Freshwater Crustacean: copepodology for the Plant Ecologist. Ecology 70, 1377–1389.
CrossRef |

Denslow, J. S. (1985). Disturbance-mediated coexhistence of species. In ‘The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics’. (Eds S. J. A. Pickett and P. S. White) pp. 307–321. (Academic Press, Inc: London, UK.).

Dodson, S. L. (1992). Predicting crustacean zooplankton species richness. Limnology and Oceanography 37, 848–856.
CrossRef |

Dussart, B. (1967). Calanoides et Harpacticoides. ‘Les Copépodes des eaux Continentales d’Europe Occidentale’. Tome I. (N Boubée & Cie: Paris).

Dussart, B. (1969). Cyclopoides et Biologie. ‘Les Copépodes des eaux Continentales d’Europe Occidentale’. Tome II. (N Boubée & Cie: Paris).

Dussart, B. H., and Defaye, D. (1995). Copepoda. Introduction to the Copepoda. ‘Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World’. Vol. 7. (SPB Academic Publishers: The Hague).

Eastwood, P. D., Souissi, S., Rogers, S. I., Coggan, R. A., and Brown, C. J. (2006). Mapping seabed assemblages using comparative top-down and bottom-up classification approaches. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63, 1536–1548.
CrossRef |

Esteban, G., and Finlay, B. (2010). Conservation work is incomplete without cryptic biodiversity. Nature 463, 293.
CrossRef | CAS | PubMed |

Faith, D. P., and Walker, P. A. (1996). How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas? On hotspots, complementarity and patterns-based approaches. Biodiversity Letters 3, 18–25.
CrossRef |

Fernández-Juricic, E. (2002). Can human disturbance promote nestedness? A case study with breeding birds in urban habitat fragments. Oecologia 131, 269–278.
CrossRef |

Fischer, J., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2005). Perfectly nested or significantly nested – an important difference for conservation management. Oikos 109, 485–494.
CrossRef |

Florencio, M., Díaz-Paniagua, C., Serrano, L., and Bilton, D. T. (2011). Spatio-temporal nested patterns in macroinvertebrate assemblages across a pond network wit a wide hydroperiod range. Oecologia 166, 469–483.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Florencio, M., Díaz-Paniagua, C., Gómez-Rodríguez, C., and Serrano, L. (2013). Biodiversity patterns in a macroinvertebrate community of a temporary pond network. Insect Conservation and Diversity 7, 4–21.

Frisch, D., Moreno-Ostos, E., and Green, A. J. (2006). Species richness and distribution of copepods and cladocerans and their relation to hydroperiod and other environmental variables in Doñana, south-west Spain. Hydrobiologia 556, 327–340.
CrossRef |

García-Barros, E., Gurrea, P., Luciáñez, M. J., Cano, J. M., Munguira, M. L., Moreno, J. C., Sainz, H., Sanz, M. J., and Simon, J. C. (2002). Parsimony analysis of endemicity and its application to animal and plant geographical distributions in the Ibero-Balearic region (western Mediterranean). Journal of Biogeography 29, 109–124.
CrossRef |

Garzón-Orduña, I. J., Miranda-Esquivel, D. R., and Donato, M. (2008). Parsimony analysis of endemicity describes but does not explain: an illustrated critique. Journal of Biogeography 35, 903–913.
CrossRef |

Goloboff, P. 1998. NONA (no name). Version 2.0. Published by the autor, Tucumán, Argentina.

Grehan, J. R. (1989). Panbiogeography and conservation science in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 16, 731–748.
CrossRef |

Guimarães, P. R., and Guimarães, P. (2006). Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices. Environmental Modelling & Software 21, 1512–1513.
CrossRef |

Hansson, L. (1998). Nestedness as a conservation tool: plants and birds of oak-hazel woodland in Sween. Ecology Letters 1, 142–145.
CrossRef |

Heino, J., Mykrä, H., and Muotka, T. (2009). Temporary variability of nestedness and idiosyncratic species in stream insect assemblages. Diversity & Distributions 15, 198–206.
CrossRef |

Hendy, M. D., and Penny, D. (1982). Branch and bound algorithms to determine minimal evolutionary trees. Mathematical Biosciences 59, 277–290.
CrossRef |

Hylander, K., Nilsson, C., Jonsson, B. G., and Göthner, T. (2005). Differences in habitat quality explain nestedness in a land snail meta-community. Oikos 108, 351–361.
CrossRef |

Jeppesen, E., Nõges, P., Davidson, T. A., Haberman, J., Nõges, T., Blank, K., Lauridsen, T. L., Søndergaard, M., Sayer, C., Laugaste, R., Johansson, L. S., Bjerring, R., and Amsinck, S. L. (2011). Zooplankton as indicators in lakes: a scientific-based plea for including zooplankton in the ecological quality assessment of lakes according to the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). Hydrobiologia 676, 279–297.
CrossRef | CAS |

Legendre, P., and Legendre, L. (2012). Numerical ecology. (Elsevier: Amsterdam).

Leibold, M. A., and Norberg, J. (2004). Biodiversity in metaccomunities: plankton as a complex adaptative systems? Limnology and Oceanography 49, 1278–1289.
CrossRef |

Leibold, M. A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J. M., Hoopes, M. F., Holt, R. D., Shurin, J. B., Law, R., Tilman, D., Loureau, M., and González, A. (2004). The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7, 601–613.
CrossRef |

Lipscomb, D. (1998). Basics of Cladistic Analysis. (George Washington University: Washington D.C.).

Lomolino, M. V. (1996). Investigating causality of nestedness of insular communities: selective immigrations or extinctions? Journal of Biogeography 23, 699–703.
CrossRef |

López-González, P., Guerrero, F., and Castro, M. C. (1998). Seasonal fluctuation in the plankton community in a hypersaline temporary lake (Honda, southern Spain). International Journal of Salt Lake Research 6, 353–371.
CrossRef |

Loreau, M., Mouquet, N., and Holt, R. D. (2003). Meta-ecosystem: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology. Ecology Letters 6, 673–679.
CrossRef |

Lorite, J., Gómez, F., Mota, J. F., and Valle, F. (2007). Orophilous plant communities of Baetic range in Andalusia (south-eastern Spain): priority altitudinal-islands for conservation. Phytocoenologia 37, 625–644.
CrossRef |

Martín-Piera, F., and Sanmartín, I. (1999). Biogeografía de áreas y biogeografía de artrópodos holárticos y mediterráneos. Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa 26, 535–560.

Martínez-Morales, M. A. (2005). Nested species assemblages as a tool to detect sensitivity to forest fragmentation: the case of cloud forest birds. Oikos 108, 634–642.

McAbendroth, L., Foggo, A., Rundle, S. D., and Bilton, D. T. (2005). Unravelling nestedness and spatial pattern in pond assemblages. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 41–49.

Massol, F., Gravel, D., Mouquet, N., Cadotte, M. W., Fukami, T., and Leibold, M. A. (2011). Linking community and ecosystem dynamics through spatial ecology. Ecology Letters 14, 313–323.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Medina-Cazorla, J. M., Garrido-Becerra, J. A., Mendoza-Fernández, A., Pérez-García, F. J., Salmerón, E., Gil, C., and Mota-Poveda, J. F. (2010). Biogeography of the Baetic ranges (SE Spain): a historical approach using cluster and parsimony analyses of endemic dolomitophytes. Plant Biosystems 144, 111–120.
CrossRef |

Monaghan, M. T., Robinson, C. T., Spaak, P., and Ward, J. V. (2005). Macroinvertebrate diversity in fragmented alpine streams: implications for freshwater conservation. Aquatic Sciences 67, 454–464.

Morrone, J. J. (1994). On the identification of areas of endemism. Systematic Biology 43, 438–441.

Morrone, J. J., and Crisci, J. V. (1995). Historical biogeography: introduction to methods. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 26, 373–401.
CrossRef |

Moss, B., Stephen, D., Álvarez, C., Bécares, E., Van De Bund, W., Collings, S. E., Van Donk, E., De Eyto, E., Feldman, T., Fernández-Aláez, C., Fernández-Aláez, M., Franken, R. J. M., García-Criado, F., Gross, E. M., Gyllström, M., Hansson, L. A., Irvine, K., Järvalt, A., Jensen, J. P., Jeppesen, E., Kairesalo, T., Kornijóv, R., Krause, T., Künnap, H., Laas, A., Lill, E., Lorens, B., Luup, H., Miracle, M. R., Noges, P., Noges, T., Nykänen, M., Ott, I., Peczula, W., Peeters, E. T. H. M., Phillips, G., Romo, S., Russel, V., Salujoe, J., Scheffer, M., Siewertsen, K., Smal, H., Tesch, C., Timm, H., Tuvikene, L., Tonno, L., Virro, T., Vicente, E., and Wilson, D. (2003). The determination of ecological status in shallow lakes – a tested system (ECOFRAME) for implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwaters Ecosystems 13, 507–549.
CrossRef |

Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858.
CrossRef | CAS | PubMed |

Naveh, Z., and Lieberman, A. (1994). Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application. (Springer-Verlag: New York).

Nixon, K. C. 2002. WinClada. Version 1.00.08. Ithaca, New York.

Ortega, F., Parra, G., and Guerrero, F. (2003). Los humedales del Alto Guadalquivir: inventario, tipologías y estado de conservación. In ‘Ecología, Manejo y Conservación de los Humedales’. (Ed M. Paracuellos) pp. 113–123. (Instituto de Estudios Almerienses: Almería, Spain).

Ortega, F., Parra, G., and Guerrero, F. (2006). Usos del suelo en las cuencas hidrográficas de los humedales del Alto Guadalquivir: importancia de una adecuada gestión. Limnetica 25, 723–732.

Oyanedel, J. P., Vega-Retter, C., Scott, S., Hinojosa, L. F., and Ramos-Jiliberto, R. (2008). Finding patterns of distribution for freshwater phytoplankton, zooplankton and fish, by means of parsimony analysis of endemicity. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural (Valparaiso, Chile) 81, 185–203.
CrossRef |

Patterson, B. D., and Atmar, W. (1986). Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammal faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 28, 65–82.
CrossRef |

Pimm, S. L., Russel, G. J., Gittleman, J. L., and Brooks, T. M. (1995). The future of biodiversity. Science 269, 347–350.
CrossRef | CAS | PubMed |

Ramos, M. A., Lobo, J. M., and Esteban, M. (2001). Ten years inventorying the Iberian fauna: results and perspectives. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, 19–28.
CrossRef |

Ramos-Jiliberto, R., Oyanedel, J. P., Vega-Retter, C., and Valdovinos, F. S. (2009). Nested structure of plankton communities from Chilean freshwaters. Limnologica 39, 319–324.
CrossRef |

Ranga-Reddy, Y. (1994). Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae. (SPB Academic Publishers: The Hague).

Rodríguez-Gironés, M. A., and Santamaría, L. (2006). A new algoritm to calculate the nestedeness temperature of presence-absence matrices. Journal of Biogeography 33, 924–935.
CrossRef |

Romo-Benito, H. (2007). Diversidad geográfica de las mariposas diurnas Ibero-Baleares. PhD Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.

Rosen, B. R. (1988). From fossils to earth history: applied historical biogeography. In ‘Analytical Biogeography: an Integrated Approach to the Study of Animal and Plant Distribution’. (Eds A. Myers, and P. Giller) pp. 437–481. (Chapman and Hall: London).

Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy. The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. (Freeman & Co: San Francisco).

Ulrich, W., Almeida-Neto, M., and Gotelli, N. J. (2009). A consumer’s guide to nestedness analysis. Oikos 118, 3–17.
CrossRef |

Vargas, J. M., Real, R., and Guerrero, J. C. (1998). Biogeographical regions of the Iberian Peninsula based on freshwaters fish and amphibian distributions. Ecography 21, 371–382.
CrossRef |

Vera, J. A. (1994). Geología de Andalucía. Enseñanzas de las Ciencias de la Tierra 2, 306–315.

Vergara, O. E., Jerez, V., and Parra, L. E. (2006). Diversidad y patrones de distribución de coleópteros en la Región del Biobío, Chile: una aproximación preliminar para la conservación de la diversidad. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural (Valparaiso, Chile) 79, 369–388.
CrossRef |

Wiley, E. O., Siegel-Causey, D., Brooks, D. R., and Funk, V. A. (1991). The Compleat Cladist. A Primer of Phylogenetic Procedures. (The University of Kansas: Lawrence, KS.)

Xu, L., Han, B., Van Damme, K., Vierstraete, A., Vanfleteren, J. R., and Dumont, H. J. (2011). Biogeography and evolution of the Holarctic zooplankton genus Leptodora (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Haplopoda). Journal of Biogeography 38, 359–370.
CrossRef |

Subscriber Login

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2016