CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Emu   
Emu
  The Journal of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists´ Union
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Rowley Reviews
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Rowley Reviews

Critical insights to key topics for ornithologists worldwide. More...


 Complete Archive
To celebrate the launch of the complete digital archive of Emu, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely online.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 101(1)

Dispersal of the environmental weed Bridal Creeper, Asparagus asparagoides, by Silvereyes, Zosterops lateralis, in south-western Australia

C. D. Stansbury

Emu 101(1) 39 - 45

Abstract

The diffusion of the environmental weed Bridal Creeper, Asparagus asparagoides, was investigated in south-western Australia. The primary aim was to identify native passerines dispersing the weed and to determine whether the weed’s current density distribution was correlated to the flight patterns of dispersal agents. The secondary aim was to test whether modelling techniques developed for assessing the diffusion of animal pests and diseases were suitable for estimating diffusion of a bird-dispersed environmental weed. Diffusion of A. asparagoides in south-western Australia mostly involved the Silvereye, Zosterops lateralis. Over 60% of weed distribution records with the greatest density were less than 50 m from source infestations. Gut passage rates of Z. lateralis and estimates of its flight speed showed that the maximum potential dispersal distance was approximately 12 km. Modelling showed significant differences between dispersal curves generated from current weed density distribution records (c. 77 m) and those generated from Z. lateralis flight pattern data (c. 90 m). Differences may have resulted from weed distribution/density maps not taking into account dispersal beyond the boundaries of fragmented habitats. The distribution of habitats favoured by Z. lateralis may influence the pattern of diffusion and rate of spread of the weed.



Full text doi:10.1071/MU00069

© CSIRO 2001

 
PDF (359 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012