CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Emu   
Emu
http://www.birdlife.org.au
  A Journal of BirdLife Australia
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Rowley Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

red arrow Complete Archive
blank image
With the complete digital archive of Emu now online, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely.

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with BirdLife
blank image
facebook   TwitterIcon

red arrow Connect with CP
blank image
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 108(2)

Importance of eucalypts in exploitation of urban parks by Rainbow and Musk Lorikeets

Justine Smith A, Alan Lill A B

A Wildlife Ecology Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Vic. 3800, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: alan.lill@sci.monash.edu.au
 
PDF (413 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

The abundance and distribution of Rainbow (Trichoglossus haematodus) and Musk (Glossopsitta concinna) Lorikeets in Melbourne have increased markedly in recent years. We studied the feeding ecology of the two species, and their interspecific aggressive interactions, in some parks in Melbourne in spring and summer to determine how availability of food might affect the success of this urban proliferation. The diets of both species were dominated by nectar or pollen (the two were not distinguished in this study) from 5–6 species of eucalypts. Feeding on native plants not indigenous to the Melbourne region accounted for 61% and 74% of feeding records of Rainbow and Musk Lorikeets respectively. Both lorikeets foraged mainly in the tree canopy (99% of records), mostly perching upright or hanging to reach their food. Nectar and pollen were readily available through spring and summer because five important eucalypt food-plant species flowered constantly and several other food-plant species flowered for a substantial proportion of the time. There was little use of lorikeet food resources by other species of bird, and lorikeets were only involved in 3.5 interspecific aggressive encounters at feeding sites per observation week. The feeding ecology of the lorikeets in spring–summer was broadly similar to that reported for Melbourne in winter and for non-urban habitats in northern and eastern Australia. Abundant nectar and pollen from ornamental eucalypts planted in the twentieth century and the apparently low level of competitive interactions with other bird species for these resources have probably been important in facilitating the recent increase in abundance and distribution of both lorikeets in Melbourne.

   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013