CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Emu   
Emu
  The Journal of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists´ Union
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Rowley Reviews
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Rowley Reviews

Critical insights to key topics for ornithologists worldwide. More...


 Complete Archive
To celebrate the launch of the complete digital archive of Emu, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely online.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 78(2)

Re-appraisal of moult of Red-necked Stints in Southern Australia

DC Paton and BJ Wykes

Emu 78(2) 54 - 60

Abstract

The Red-necked Stint Calidris ruficollis breeds in the northern hemisphere and migrates to southern latitudes for its non-breeding period where adults undergo a complete moult of the flight feathers. Juveniles follow the adults to the wintering grounds but remain for the breeding season, the southern winter, and do not moult all their flight feathers until the following year. Returning adults and second-year birds begin to moult their primaries between late August and early December and finish between late December and late March. The mean duration of moult of their primaries is calculated as 130 days, fifteen days longer than that previously reported. Previous authors may not have distinguished non-moulting first-year birds and the inaccuracies in their method of calculation probably account for the difference. Distributions of the moult scores of the primaries of the adults are unimodal and we dispel Evans's (1975) suggestion of subgroups. Pooling of data from separate samples, asymmetry between the wings during early stages of moult, decrease in the rate d moult in middle to late stages and possible bias in sampling all may have contributed to the artificial formation of subgroups.



Full text doi:10.1071/MU9780054

© CSIRO 1978

 
PDF (514 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012