CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Emu   
Emu
  A Journal of BirdLife Australia
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Rowley Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 Interview with Graeme Hamilton
Hear a 6PR radio interview with Birds Australia CEO Graeme Hamilton discussing Darryl Jones’ recent Emu Editorial on bird feeding.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 94(3)

Temporal Vocalization Patterns in Members of a Eucalypt Forest Bird Community: the Effects of Weather on Song Production

A Keast

Emu 94(3) 172 - 180

Abstract

A survey of diel temporal vocalisation patterns in nine members of a eucalypt forest bird community in mid-breeding season (October) showed that in five (Yellowfaced Honeyeater, Little Wattlebird, Rufous Whistler, Striated Thornbill and Superb Fairy-wren) peak singing was from about 30, to 5 minutes pre-sunrise; in one (Grey Shrikethrush) it extended from about 25 minutes pre- to 25 minutes post-sunrise; and in three (Spotted Pardalote, Common Bronzewing and Magpie Lark) it began only about sunrise. In all species there was an initial 20-40 minute period of peak singing followed by a sharp curtailment. The timing and patterns differed between species. Only three species sang regularly through the middle of the day and these vocalisation rates were only about 1/10 to 1/100 of the early morning maximum. The broad similarity of the species' patterns provided no support for the Cody & Brown (1969) suggestion that species vocalisation times have evolved to minimise interspecific acoustical interference. An independent analysis of the effects of weather on temporal vocalisation patterns showed that rain delayed morning song and depressed vocal activity in all species except the Kookaburra, fog had no effect and that dull weather depressed it in only one species, the Rufous Whistler.



Full text doi:10.1071/MU9940172

© CSIRO 1994

 
PDF (600 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012