Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Editorial Policy on Referees

Harry F. Recher

Pacific Conservation Biology 5(3) 162 - 162
Published: 1999

Abstract

There is more to being a scientist than completing a research project and communicating the results to one's peers and the general public. Scientists have a wide range of responsibilities both within the scientific community and within society as a whole. I have frequently urged my colleagues to participate in the political processes of environmental management and conservation. It is equally necessary for scientists to contribute to the mechanics of keeping the scientific community functional. Individuals need to take responsibility for organizing scientific meetings, administering scientific societies, reviewing grant applications, and publishing professional journals. Peer review of the work and research proposals of colleagues is a necessary contribution of time if the machinery of science is to function smoothly. As editor of this journal, I can assure you that not all scientists accept these responsibilities.

https://doi.org/10.1071/PC990162

© CSIRO 1999

Committee on Publication Ethics

PDF (71 KB) Export Citation Get Permission

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share via Email