Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The contribution of Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development-supported research to primary health care policy and practice

Lynsey J. Brown A B and Ellen L. McIntyre A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Primary Health Care Research and Information Service, Discipline of General Practice, Level 3, Health Sciences Building, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: lynsey.brown@flinders.edu.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 20(1) 47-55 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY12058
Submitted: 10 May 2012  Accepted: 19 September 2012   Published: 24 October 2012

Abstract

The importance of primary health care (PHC) research is well understood yet conducting this research can be challenging. Barriers include a lack of funding, support and opportunity. In 2000 the Australian government introduced the Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) Strategy to address the gap in high-quality research. One component of the strategy, the Research Capacity Building Initiative, provided funding to university departments of general practice and rural health, allowing them to expand their pool of researchers and produce more research relevant to policy and practice. This study investigates the impact of phase two of the PHCRED Strategy by analysing peer-reviewed publications from PHCRED-supported departments. Research output was recorded from 2006 to 2010 incorporating 661 publications in 212 journals. Rural departments often had fewer resources than urban departments yet demonstrated steady research contributions focusing on issues relevant to their community. Since its inception the PHCRED Strategy has enabled development of research capacity and contributed to the body of PHC knowledge. While PHC is a diverse field, reflected in the publications produced, the themes underlying much of this work were representative of current health reform and the priority areas and building blocks of the National PHC Strategy.

Additional keywords: document review, health reform, general practice, research capacity building, rural health.


References

Askew DA, Schluter PJ, Gunn JM (2008) Research productivity in Australian general practice: what has changed since the 1990s? The Medical Journal of Australia 189, 103–104.

Beacham B, Kalucy L, Lowcay B (2003) Priorities for research in the area of primary health care. How relevant are recently completed General Practice Evaluation Program projects? Australian Family Physician 32, 377–380.

Birden HH (2007) The Researcher Development Program: how to extend the involvement of Australian general practitioners in research? Rural and Remote Health 7, 776

Del Mar C, Askew D (2004) Building family/general practice research capacity. Annals of Family Medicine 2, S35–S40.
Building family/general practice research capacity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Department of Health and Ageing (2010) ‘Building a 21st century primary health care system: Australia’s first National Primary Health Care Strategy.’ (Department of Health and Ageing: Canberra)

Dunbar N, Comino E, Mehmet S, Harris M (2002) Research capacity in general practice. Australian Family Physician 31, 205–207.

Farmer E, Weston K (2002) A conceptual model for capacity building in Australian primary health care research. Australian Family Physician 31, 1139–1142.

Glanville J, Kendrick T, McNally R, Campbell J, Hobbs FDR (2011) Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States: bibliometric analysis. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 342, d1028
Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States: bibliometric analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Glynn LG, O’Riordan C, MacFarlane A, Newell J, Iglesias AA, Whitford D, Cantillon P, Murphy AW (2009) Research activity and capacity in primary healthcare: The REACH study: a survey. BMC Family Practice 10, 33
Research activity and capacity in primary healthcare: The REACH study: a survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hancock B, Wilson S (2006) Valuing primary care research: gold not alchemy. Primary Health Care Research and Development 7, 10–12.
Valuing primary care research: gold not alchemy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hay AD, Rortveit G, Purdy S, Adams J, Sanci LA, Schermer TR, Schers HJ, van der Windt DA (2012) Primary care research − an international responsibility. Family Practice 29, 499–500.
Primary care research − an international responsibility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jansen MW, Ruwaard D (2012) Making an impact instead of ‘publish or perish’. European Journal of Public Health 22, 613–614.

Kalucy L, Jackson Bowers E (2009) ‘Primary Health Care Research Contribution Project: The contribution of primary health care research to the 2008–9 health reform process in Australia.’ (Primary Health Care Research & Information Service, Discipline of General Practice, Flinders University: Adelaide)

Kalucy EC, Jackson Bowers EM (2010) Health reform and the Medical Journal of Australia. The Medical Journal of Australia 193, 78–79.

Mant D, Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Knottnerus A, Wallace P, van Weel C (2004) The state of primary-care research. Lancet 364, 1004–1006.
The state of primary-care research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McAvoy BR (2005) Primary care research − what in the world is going on? The Medical Journal of Australia 183, 110–112.

McGrail MR, Rickard CM, Jones R (2006) Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development 25, 19–35.
Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McIntyre E, Saltman D, Traynor V, Sims J, Richards J, Dollard J (2007) Building research capacity in Australian departments of general practice and rural health: a document review of annual reports. Primary Health Care Research and Development 8, 3–11.
Building research capacity in Australian departments of general practice and rural health: a document review of annual reports.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McIntyre E, Brun L, Cameron H, Lyle D (2010) ‘Evaluation of the Researcher Development Program (RDP) of the Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) Strategy: The Fellows’ perspective.’ (Primary Health Care Research & Information Service, Discipline of General Practice, Flinders University: Adelaide)

McIntyre EL, Mazza D, Harris NP (2011) NHMRC funding for primary health care research, 2000–2008. The Medical Journal of Australia 195, 230

Mendis K, Kidd MR, Schattner P, Canalese J (2010) A bibliometric analysis of Australian general practice publications from 1980 to 2007 using PubMed. Informatics in Primary Care 18, 223–233.

Miller WL, Crabtree BF (1992) Primary care research: a multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In ‘Doing qualitative research’. (Eds BF Crabtree, WL Miller) pp. 3–28. (SAGE Publications: Newbury Park, CA)

Morgan DL (1993) Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research 3, 112–121.
Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3gvVCruw%3D%3D&md5=4bac0760ea861d57919d6ff0f705e048CAS |

National Health and Medical Research Council (2012) ‘NHMRC research funding datasets 1990–2010.’ (NHMRC: Canberra) Available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/grants/dataset/rmis/index.htm [Verified April 2012]

Oceania Health Consulting (2005) ‘Summary report of the Evaluation of the Primary Health Care Research, Education and Development Strategy.’ (Oceania Health Consulting: Australia)

Ovhed I, Van Royen P, Hakansson A (2005) What is the future of primary health care research? Probably fairly bright, if we may believe the historical development. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 23, 248–253.
What is the future of primary health care research? Probably fairly bright, if we may believe the historical development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reed RL, Kalucy EC, Jackson-Bowers E, McIntyre E (2011) What research impacts do Australian primary health care researchers expect and achieve? Health Research Policy and Systems 9, 40
What research impacts do Australian primary health care researchers expect and achieve?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ried K, Farmer EA, Weston KM (2007) Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care. BMC Family Practice 8, 19
Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Der Weyden MB (2008) Health policy and reform: gathering the evidence. The Medical Journal of Australia 189, 169–170.

Yallop JJ, McAvoy BR, Croucher JL, Tonkin A, Piterman L (2006) Primary health care research − essential but disadvantaged. The Medical Journal of Australia 185, 118–120.

Yen L, Kalucy L, Ward N, Katterl R, McIntyre E, Patterson S (2010) ‘Stocktake of primary health care research in Australia.’ (Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute and the Primary Health Care Research & Information Service: Canberra)