Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Consumer satisfaction with practice nursing: a cross-sectional survey in New Zealand general practice

Elizabeth Halcomb A D , Deborah Davies B and Yenna Salamonson C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

B Health Care Development, MidCentral District Health Board, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.

C School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: ehalcomb@uow.edu.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 21(3) 347-353 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY13176
Submitted: 21 December 2013  Accepted: 25 March 2014   Published: 28 April 2014

Abstract

An important consideration in health service delivery is ensuring that services meet consumer needs. Whilst nursing services in primary care have grown internationally, there has been limited exploration of consumer satisfaction with these services. This paper reports a descriptive survey that sought to evaluate consumers’ perceptions of New Zealand practice nurses (PNs). One thousand, five hundred and five patients who received nursing services at one of 20 participating New Zealand general practices completed a survey tool between December 2010 and December 2011. The 64-item self-report survey tool contained the 21-item General Practice Nurse Satisfaction (GPNS) scale. Data were analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Internal consistency of the GPNS scale was high (Cronbach’s α 0.97). Participants aged over 60 years and those of European descent were significantly less satisfied with the PN (P = 0.001). Controlling for these characteristics, participants who had visited the PN more than four times previously were 1.34 times (adjusted odds ratio 1.34 (95% CI: 1.06–1.70) more satisfied than the comparison group (up to 4 previous visits to PN). In addition to the further validation of the psychometric properties of the GPNS scale in a different setting, the study also revealed a high level of satisfaction with PNs, with increased satisfaction with an increased number of visits. Nevertheless, the lower levels of satisfaction with PNs in the older age group as well as those of European descent, warrants further examination. The study also highlights the need for PNs and consumers to discuss consumer’s expectations of services and create a shared understanding of treatment goals.

Additional keywords: consumer satisfaction, office nurse, primary care nursing, survey.


References

Adler R, Vasiliadis A, Bickell N (2010) The relationship between continuity and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Family Practice 27, 171–178.

Andrew S, Salamonson Y, Everett B, Halcomb EJ, Davidson PM (2011) Beyond the ceiling effect: using a mixed methods approach to measure patient satisfaction. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 5, 52–63.
Beyond the ceiling effect: using a mixed methods approach to measure patient satisfaction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baker R (1990) Development of a questionnaire to assess patients’ satisfaction with consultations in general practice. The British Journal of General Practice 40, 487–490.

Campbell J, Smith P, Nissen S, Bower P, Elliott M, Roland M (2009) The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK - development and psychometric characteristics. BMC Family Practice 10, 57
The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK - development and psychometric characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19698140PubMed |

Cheek J, Price K, Dawson A, Mott K, Beilby J, Wilkinson D (2002) ‘Consumer perceptions of nursing and nurses in general practice.’ (Centre for Research into Nursing and Health Care, University of South Australia: Adelaide).

Cheraghi-Sohi S, Bower P, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Roland M (2006) What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual ‘map’ of patient preferences. Health Expectations 9, 275–284.
What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual ‘map’ of patient preferences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16911142PubMed |

de Graaf-Ruizendaal WA, Berendsen AJ, de Boer D, de Bakker DH (2013) Do patient and practice characteristics confound age-group differences in preferences for general practice care? A quantitative study. BMC Family Practice 14, 90
Do patient and practice characteristics confound age-group differences in preferences for general practice care? A quantitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23800156PubMed |

Desborough J, Banfield M, Parker R (2013) A tool to evaluate patients’ experiences of nursing care in Australian general practice: development of the Patient Enablement and Satisfaction Survey. Australian Journal of Primary Health
A tool to evaluate patients’ experiences of nursing care in Australian general practice: development of the Patient Enablement and Satisfaction Survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23469805PubMed |

Donovan JL (1995) Patient decision making. The missing ingredient in compliance research. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 11, 443–455.
Patient decision making. The missing ingredient in compliance research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FgsFehtw%3D%3D&md5=4ea40f3e7aaea13568c95d1ddb01640fCAS | 7591546PubMed |

Grogan S, Conner M, Norman P, Willits D, Porter I (2000) Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services. Quality in Health Care 9, 210–215.
Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3nt1Gisw%3D%3D&md5=de57066716383f65757d1107abe7320fCAS | 11101705PubMed |

Halcomb E, Davidson P, Daly J, Yallop J, Tofler G (2004) Australian nurses in general practice based heart failure management: implications for innovative collaborative practice. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 3, 135–147.
Australian nurses in general practice based heart failure management: implications for innovative collaborative practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15234318PubMed |

Halcomb EJ, Caldwell B, Salamonson Y, Davidson PM (2011) Development and psychometric validation of the General Practice Nurse Satisfaction scale. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 43, 318–327.

Halcomb EJ, Peters K, Davies D (2013) A qualitative evaluation of New Zealand consumers perceptions of general practice nurses. BMC Family Practice 14, 26
A qualitative evaluation of New Zealand consumers perceptions of general practice nurses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23433311PubMed |

Hegney D, Buikstra E, Fallon T, Martin-McDonald K, Patterson E, Rees S (2004a) ‘Consumer perceptions of practice nurses.’ (Centre for Rural and Remote Area Health, University of Southern Queensland: Toowoomba, Qld)

Hegney D, Price K, Patterson E, Martin-McDonald K, Rees S (2004b) Australian consumers’ expectations for expanded nursing roles in general practice: choice not gatekeeping. Australian Family Physician 33, 845–849.

Hoare KJ, Mills J, Francis K (2012) The role of Government policy in supporting nurse-led care in general practice in the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia: an adapted realist review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 68, 963–980.
The role of Government policy in supporting nurse-led care in general practice in the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia: an adapted realist review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22070658PubMed |

Kinnersley P, Stott N, Peters T, Harvey I, Hackett P (1996) A comparison of methods for measuring patient satisfaction with consultations in primary care. Family Practice 13, 41–51.
A comparison of methods for measuring patient satisfaction with consultations in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK283lt1Ogtg%3D%3D&md5=c8374542fde71d4de624f047990def6aCAS | 8671103PubMed |

Laurant MGH, Hermens RPMG, Braspenning JCC, Akkermans RP, Sibbald B, Grol RPTM (2008) An overview of patients’ preferences for, and satisfaction with, care provided by general practitioners and nurse practitioners. Journal of Clinical Nursing 17, 2690–2698.
An overview of patients’ preferences for, and satisfaction with, care provided by general practitioners and nurse practitioners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mahomed R, St John W, Patterson E (2012) Understanding the process of patient satisfaction with nurse-led chronic disease management in general practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 68, 2538–2549.
Understanding the process of patient satisfaction with nurse-led chronic disease management in general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22384855PubMed |

Marsden PV, Wright JD (Eds) (2010) ‘Handbook of survey research.’(Emerald Group Publishing Ltd: Bingley, UK)

Marshall B, Floyd S, Forrest R (2011) Clinical outcomes and patients perceptions of nurse-led healthy lifestyle clinics. Journal of Primary Health Care 3, 48–52.

Merkouris A, Papathanassoglou EDE, Lemonidou C (2004) Evaluation of patient satisfaction with nursing care: quantitative or qualitative approach? International Journal of Nursing Studies 41, 355–367.
Evaluation of patient satisfaction with nursing care: quantitative or qualitative approach?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15050847PubMed |

National Health Committee (2007) ‘Meeting the needs of people with chronic conditions – Hapai te whanau mo ake tonu’(National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability: Wellington, NZ)

Potiriadis M, Chondros P, Gilchrist G, Hegarty K, Blashki G, Gunn JM (2008) How do Australian patients rate their general practitioner? A descriptive study using the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire. The Medical Journal of Australia 189, 215–219.

Poulton BC (1996) Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients’ satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses: reliability, replicability and discriminant validity. The British Journal of General Practice 46, 26–31.

Pullon S, McKinlay E, Dew K (2009) Primary health care in New Zealand: the impact of organisational factors on teamwork. The British Journal of General Practice 59, 191–197.
Primary health care in New Zealand: the impact of organisational factors on teamwork.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19275835PubMed |

Redsell S, Stokes T, Jackson C, Hastings A, Baker R (2007) Patients’ accounts of the differences in nurses’ and general practitioners’ roles in primary care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 57, 172–180.
Patients’ accounts of the differences in nurses’ and general practitioners’ roles in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17214753PubMed |

Voogdt-Pruis HR, Gorgels APM, van Ree JW, van Hoef EFM, Beusmans GHMI (2010) Patient perceptions of nurse-delivered cardiovascular prevention: cross-sectional survey within a randomised trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47, 1237–1244.
Patient perceptions of nurse-delivered cardiovascular prevention: cross-sectional survey within a randomised trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20303080PubMed |

Williams SJ, Calnan M (1991) Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice. Family Practice 8, 237–242.
Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FntVKmsw%3D%3D&md5=fbd8dd85593cd2562d12125bef4dbc80CAS | 1959723PubMed |

Williams S, Weinman J, Dale J, Newman S (1995) Patient expectations: what do primary care patients want from the GP and how far does meeting expectations affect patient satisfaction? Family Practice 12, 193–201.
Patient expectations: what do primary care patients want from the GP and how far does meeting expectations affect patient satisfaction?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fms1WksA%3D%3D&md5=b74eb393002acd10349a46b3ecdc6bbbCAS | 7589944PubMed |

Wilson AE (2000). The changing nature of primary health care teams and interprofessional relationships. In ‘Contemporary primary care: the challenges of change’. (Ed. P. Tovey) pp. 43–62. (Open University Press: Buckingham)