Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

When colocation is not enough: a case study of General Practitioner Super Clinics in Australia

Riki Lane A D , Grant Russell A , Elizabeth A. Bardoel B , Jenny Advocat A , Nicholas Zwar C , P. Gawaine Powell Davies C and Mark F. Harris C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Southern Academic Primary Care Research Unit, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Building 1, 270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Vic. 3168, Australia.

B Department of Management, Monash University, Caulfield Campus, Vic. 3145, Australia.

C Centre of Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: riki.lane@monash.edu

Australian Journal of Primary Health 23(2) 107-113 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY16039
Submitted: 22 March 2016  Accepted: 27 June 2016   Published: 17 August 2016

Journal Compilation © La Trobe University 2017 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Developed nations are implementing initiatives to transform the delivery of primary care. New models have been built around multidisciplinary teams, information technology and systematic approaches for chronic disease management (CDM). In Australia, the General Practice Super Clinic (GPSC) model was introduced in 2010. A case study approach was used to illustrate the development of inter-disciplinary CDM over 12 months in two new, outer urban GPSCs. A social scientist visited each practice for two 3–4-day periods. Data, including practice documents, observations and in-depth interviews (n = 31) with patients, clinicians and staff, were analysed using the concept of organisational routines. Findings revealed slow, incremental evolution of inter-disciplinary care in both sites. Clinic managers found the facilitation of inter-disciplinary routines for CDM difficult in light of competing priorities within program objectives and the demands of clinic construction. Constraints inherent within the GPSC program, a lack of meaningful support for transformation of the model of care and the lack of effective incentives for collaborative care in fee-for-service billing arrangements, meant that program objectives for integrated multidisciplinary care were largely unattainable. Findings suggest that the GPSC initiative should be considered a program for infrastructure support rather than one of primary care transformation.


References

Akter S, Doran F, Avila C, Nancarrow S (2014) A qualitative study of staff perspectives of patient non-attendance in a regional primary healthcare setting. The Australasian Medical Journal 7, 218–226.
A qualitative study of staff perspectives of patient non-attendance in a regional primary healthcare setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24944719PubMed |

Australian National Audit Office (2013) Administration of the GP Super Clinics Program. Available at http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/provider/business/education/files/2584-practice-nurse-items-qrg.pdf [Verified 17 September 2013]

Bajorek B, LeMay K, Gunn K, Armour C (2015) The potential role for a pharmacist in a multidisciplinary general practitioner super clinic. The Australasian Medical Journal 8, 52–63.
The potential role for a pharmacist in a multidisciplinary general practitioner super clinic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25810788PubMed |

Becker M (2004) Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change 13, 643–678.
Organizational routines: a review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bodenheimer T, Ghorob A, Willard-Grace R, Grumbach K (2014) The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care. Annals of Family Medicine 12, 166–171.
The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24615313PubMed |

Brown L, Oliver-Baxter J, Bywood P (2013) International trends and initiatives in primary health care. RESEARCH ROUNDup 2013(32). (Primary Health Care Research & Information Service: Adelaide) Available at http://www.phcris.org.au/phplib/filedownload.php?file=/elib/lib/downloaded_files/publications/pdfs/phcris_pub_8411.pdf [Verified 19 July 2016]

Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH (2009) Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium. Health Affairs 28, 75–85.
Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19124857PubMed |

Considine R, Tozer J, Milne H, Chappe M (2012) Evaluation of the GP Super Clinics Program 2007–2008. (Department of Health and Ageing: Canberra) Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/CA2578620005D57ACA257A640013615C/$File/Report%20Evaluation%20of%20GP%20Super%20Clinics%20Program%202007-08%20August%202012%20.pdf [Verified 30 October 2012]

Dart JM, Jackson CL, Chenery HJ, Shaw PN, Wilkinson D (2010) Meeting local complex health needs by building the capacity of general practice: The University of Queensland GP super clinic model—Viewpoint. The Medical Journal of Australia 193, 86–89.

Department of Health and Ageing (2010) ‘GP Super Clinics National Program Guide.’ (Australian Government: Canberra)

DiCenso A, Auffrey L, Bryant-Lukosius D, Donald F, Martin-Misener R, Matthews S, Opsteen J (2007) Primary health care nurse practitioners in Canada. Contemporary Nurse 26, 104–115.
Primary health care nurse practitioners in Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18041990PubMed |

Greenhalgh T (2008) Role of routines in collaborative work in healthcare organisations. British Medical Journal 337, a2448
Role of routines in collaborative work in healthcare organisations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19015186PubMed |

Jackson C (2012) Australian general practice: primed for the ‘patient-centred medical home’? The Medical Journal of Australia 197, 365–366.
Australian general practice: primed for the ‘patient-centred medical home’?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23025723PubMed |

Lebrun-Harris LA, Shi L, Zhu J, Burke MT, Sripipatana A, Ngo-Metzger Q (2013) Effects of patient-centered medical home attributes on patients’ perceptions of quality in federally supported health centers. Annals of Family Medicine 11, 508–516.
Effects of patient-centered medical home attributes on patients’ perceptions of quality in federally supported health centers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24218374PubMed |

Nancarrow S, Bradbury J, Avila C (2014) Factors associated with non-attendance in a general practice super clinic population in regional Australia: a retrospective cohort study. The Australasian Medical Journal 7, 323–333.
Factors associated with non-attendance in a general practice super clinic population in regional Australia: a retrospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25279008PubMed |

Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stange KC, Stewart E, Jaen C (2011) Transforming physician practices to patient-centered medical homes: lessons from the national demonstration project. Health Affairs 30, 439–445.
Transforming physician practices to patient-centered medical homes: lessons from the national demonstration project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21383361PubMed |

Ohman Strickland P, Crabtree B (2007) Modelling effectiveness of internally heterogeneous organization in the presence of survey non-response: an application to the ULTRA study. Statistics in Medicine 26, 1702–1711.
Modelling effectiveness of internally heterogeneous organization in the presence of survey non-response: an application to the ULTRA study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Patton MQ (2002) ‘Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods.’ (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA)

Pentland B, Feldman M (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change 14, 793–815.
Organizational routines as a unit of analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Quinn MT, Gunter KE, Nocon RS, Lewis SE, Vable AM, Tang H, Park SY, Casalino LP, Huang ES, Birnberg J, Burnet DL, Summerfelt WT, Chin MH (2013) Undergoing transformation to the patient centered medical home in safety net health centers: perspectives from the front lines. Ethnicity & Disease 23, 356–362.

Rämgård M, Blomqvist K, Petersson P (2015) Developing health and social care planning in collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care 29, 354–358.
Developing health and social care planning in collaboration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25633427PubMed |

Richards L (2002) ‘Using NVivo in Qualitative Research.’ (Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty. Ltd: Melbourne)

Rosser WW, Colwill JM, Kasperski J, Wilson L (2010) Patient-centered medical homes in Ontario. The New England Journal of Medicine 362, e7
Patient-centered medical homes in Ontario.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20054034PubMed |

Russell GM, Dahrouge S, Hogg W, Geneau R, Muldoon L, Tuna M (2009) Managing chronic disease in Ontario primary care: the impact of organizational factors. Annals of Family Medicine 7, 309–318.
Managing chronic disease in Ontario primary care: the impact of organizational factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19597168PubMed |

Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) ‘Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory.’ (Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA)

Van Der Weyden MB (2011) We will build it… but will they come? Medical Journal of Australia 194, 64

Wagner E, Coleman K, Reid R, Phillips K, Sugarman J (2012) ‘Guiding Transformation: How Medical Practices Can Become Patient-Centered Medical Homes.’ (The Commonwealth Fund: New York)