CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 16(2)

4 CHROMOSOMAL STABILITY OF AFRICAN WILD CAT (FELIS SILVESTRIS LIBICA) SOMATIC CELLS AND CLONED EMBRYOS

A.M. Giraldo A B, M.C. Gomez A B, B.L. Dresser B C, R.F. Harris B, A.L. King B, C.E. Pope B

A Department of Animal Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. email: agirall@lsu.edu
B Audubon Center for Research of Endagered Species, NewOrleans, LA, USA
C Department of Biological Science, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA.
 
 Full Text
 PDF (111 KB)
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Nuclear transfer (NT) procedures are generally inefficient and chromosomal abnormalities have been suggested as one causative factor. Embryos derived by somatic cell NT show a high incidence of aneuploidy, which seems to be reflective of the donor cell line with high chromosomal abnormalities (Bureau et al., 2003, Theriogenology 59, 239). Also, aneuploidies in some cell lines increase progressively with the number of passages (Denning et al., 2001, Cloning 3, 221–231). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyze the chromosomal stability of donor cells at different passages as well as that of reconstructed embryos derived from these cells. A primary culture of African wild cat (AWC) fibroblast cells was established from a skin sample and cultured until cells stopped dividing at passage 9. Chromosome numbers were determined in cells using a karyotyping technique (Iwasaki et al., 1992 J Exp Zool 261, 79–85) at passages 1 and 3 through 9. At passages 1, 3, 4 and 9, NT of AWC fibroblast cells into domestic cat cytoplasts was done (Gomez et al., 2003, Biol Reprod 69, 1032–1041). Reconstructed blastocysts were treated with colcemid (0.28 μg mL-1) and fixed for karyotyping to evaluate chromosome numbers in the blastomeres. Blastomere metaphases were often highly contracted or overlapping, so that only 1 to 7 sets of metaphase chromosomes per embryo were spread sufficiently to allow determination of ploidy. No attempt to produce NT embryos using cells at passages 5 through 8 was done because the percentages of aneuploidies of these passages were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Data were analyzed by chi-square test (P < 0.05). As shown in the Table, the percentage of aneuploidy in the somatic cells increased progressively with duration of culture. Furthermore, the percentage of chromosomal abnormalities in reconstructed embryos was similar to that of the cells from which they were derived. Accordingly, for future NT, we propose to use donor cells at early passages when the percentage of cells with chromosomal abnormalities is still relatively low. Research was funded partially by the John & Shirley Davies Foundation.

   
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012