CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
Journal Banner
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

Affiliated Societies

RFD is the official journal of the International Embryo Transfer Society and the Society for Reproductive Biology.


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 17(2)

157 HOLSTEIN-CHINESE YELLOW HYBRID RECIPIENT OOCYTES RECOVERED BY OVUM PICKUP CAN IMPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLONED BOVINE EMBRYOS

X.Y. Yang A, J.G. Zhao A, H.W. Li A, H. Li A, H.F. Liu A, Y.T. Zeng A, S.Z. Huang A

AInstitute of Medical Genetics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. Email: ytzeng@stn.sh.cn
 
 Full Text
 PDF (150 KB)
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

We used the subspecies hybrid F1 oocytes (Holstein/Chinese Yellow cattle) recovered by ovum pickup (OPU) as recipient cytoplasts to improve the development of bovine cloned embryos. Ten Holstein cattle, four Chinese Yellow cattle, and four hybrid F1 bovines were subjected to OPU once a week. In total, 44, 110, and 42 OPU sessions were respectively performed for hybrid cattle, Holstein cattle and Chinese Yellow cattle. The mean numbers of punctured follicles for hybrid and Yellow cattle were higher than for Holstein cattle (11.4 ± 0.5 and 11.7 ± 0.5 vs. 10.1 ± 0.7, mean ± SE), but the recovery rate for Holstein cattle was higher than that for hybrid and Yellow cattle (76.2% vs. 70.3% and 66.6%); therefore, recovered oocytes per session were similar in hybrid, Holstein, and Yellow cattle (8.0 ± 0.5, 7.7 ± 0.4 and 7.8 ± 0.5, respectively). No difference was shown in the quality of the recovered oocytes among the three breeds. The three kinds of recipient oocytes had a maturation rate of 72–73% (256/353, 614/847, and 238/327, respectively). Matured oocytes were used as recipients without selection, and same batch cumulus cells collected from Holstein cow were used as donor cells. The nuclear transfer procedure was essentially as described by Park et al. (2004 Mol. Reprod. Dev. 69, 365–374). Cleavage rate of reconstructed embryos was similar in the hybrid, Holstein, and Yellow groups (66%, 66%, and 75%, respectively). However, the blastocyst rate from the cleavage embryos (51% vs. 37% and 27%), cell number of each blastocyst on Day 8 (135 ± 4.1 vs. 116 ± 3.6, and 101 ± 4.2), and the percentage of Grade A blastocysts (54% vs. 42% and 29%) in the hybrid group were higher than in the Holstein and Yellow groups. The proportion of blastocyst production on Day 7 was greater in the hybrid group than in the Holstein and Yellow groups (89% vs. 71% and 63%). The blastocyst rate from morula in the hybrid group (84%, 37/44) was significantly higher than in the Holstein group (63%, 52/83) and the Yellow group (59%, 24/43). Taken together, these results strongly show that hybrid recipient oocytes can improve the development of cloned bovine embryos. It is suggested that the genetic heterogeneity of the hybrid recipient cytoplasm would lead to more possibilities of reprogramming and embryo development.

This work was supported by the Chinese “863” High-Tech Plan Program (Grant No. 2002AA206201).

   
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013