CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 18(2)

23 NEONATAL PHYSIOLOGICAL STATUS OF CLONED AND CONTROL CALVES

C. A. Batchelder A, M. B. Whitcomb B, M. Bertolini A, J. B. Mason A, S. G. Petkov A, K. A. Hoffert A, L. W. George B, G. B. Anderson A

A Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, CA 95616, USA
B School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, CA 95616, USA
 
 Full Text
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Health problems and mortality rates of cloned calves are major limitations of cloning technology and represent substantial economic losses as well as justifiable animal health and welfare concerns. The objectives of this study were to compare neonatal viability and physiological status of cloned and control calves. Cloned (Holstein, n = 5; Hereford, n = 3) and control (embryo transfer: Holstein, n = 3; Hereford, n = 3) calves were carried in the same group of Hereford × Angus crossbred recipient dams and were delivered by Cesarean section at term (Days 273–280) following induced labor. Additional calves (Holstein, n = 3; Hereford, n = 2) resulting from AI and delivered vaginally by their natural dams (Days 269–279) following spontaneous initiation of parturition were included as normal controls to evaluate the effects of the induction procedure. Physical evaluations and measurements of blood biochemistry (19 parameters), gases and electrolytes (9 parameters), and complete blood counts (18 parameters) were performed within 10 min of birth and at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h after birth. Cloned calves were observed with increased occurrence of flexural limb deformities (4/8 clones, 0/9 controls; P < 0.05) and developmental delays of physical adjustment parameters such as time to suckle and stand (5/8 clones requiring >3 h; P < 0.05). Cloned calves were more variable than, but not different from, controls for most blood parameters measured. Compared with controls, at birth clones exhibited reduced red blood cell counts (6.8 and 8.6 × 109 cells/mL, clones and controls, respectively; P < 0.01), plasma bicarbonate (23.1 vs. 26.2 mmol/L; P < 0.05), and plasma glucose (39.4 vs. 73.6 mg/dL; P < 0.05). Blood urea nitrogen concentrations in clones tended to be elevated beginning 24 h after birth and were significantly greater than those in controls by 48 h (13.4 vs. 7.4 mg/dL; P < 0.01). Echocardiographic measurements at 24 h of age varied between groups (Table 1) and were indicative of circulatory abnormalities likely originating in utero for clones. The results of this study identified the physiological differences between clones and controls at birth and may be useful in the development of clinical-care protocols to maximize the health and survival of cloned calves.

   
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012