Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

111 SLOW FREEZING AND VITRIFICATION OF IN VITRO-MATURED DOMESTIC CAT OOCYTES

J. Braun A , C. Otzdorff A , T. Tsujioka B and S. Hochi B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Veterinary College, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Muenchen, Germany

B Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 19(1) 173-173 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv19n1Ab111
Submitted: 12 October 2006  Accepted: 12 October 2006   Published: 12 December 2006

Abstract

The effects of slow freezing or vitrification as well as exposure to the cryoprotective media without cooling and warming of in vitro-matured domestic cat oocytes on the in vitro development to the blastocyst stage was investigated. Cumulus–oocyte complexes were matured for 24 h in TCM-199 supplemented with 3 mg mL−1 BSA, 1 µg mL−1 estradiol, 0.1 IU mL−1 FSH, and 0.0063 IU mL−1 LH. Denuded oocytes with a detectable first polar body were inseminated with 2 × 106 cells mL−1 cauda epididymal spermatozoa for 22 h in TALP solution. Presumptive zygotes were cultured in modified SOF medium at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air. For slow freezing, oocytes were equilibrated for 20 min at ambient temperatures in PBS with 20% FCS containing either 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) + 0.2 M sucrose or 1.5 M EG + 0.2 M trehalose. Oocytes were loaded into 0.25-mL straws, cooled to −7°C at 2°C min, held for 5 min, seeded, cooled down to −30°C at 0.3°C min, and finally plunged into liquid nitrogen. The straws were thawed for 5 s at room temperature and for 30 s in a waterbath at 30°C. Oocytes were washed 3 times before insemination. In vitro-matured oocytes were exposed to the cryoprotective media for 30 min before they were inseminated and then they were cultured for 7 days. For vitrification (Hochi et al. 2004 Theriogenology 61, 267–275), a minimum-volume cooling procedure using Cryotop (Kitazato Supply Co., Tokyo, Japan) as a cryodevice was applied. No blastocysts could be obtained after slow freezing with a cryoprotective medium containing 0.2 M sucrose. Simple exposure to the same freezing medium after in vitro maturation without cryopreservation resulted in a blastocyst rate of 7.9% (control oocytes, 10.7%; not significant (NS); chi-square analysis). Use of trehalose as an extracellular cryoprotectant resulted in the harvest of one blastocyst (0.6%) after slow freezing. Exposure to the same cryoprotective medium resulted in a blastocyst rate of 10.0% (fresh control, 10.9%; NS). After exposure of in vitro-matured oocytes to the vitrification solution, a blastocyst rate of 16.0% was observed (8/50), which was not statistically different from the blastocyst rate in fresh control oocytes (16.3%; 15/92). No blastocysts could be obtained after vitrification (0/64). The results (Table 1) demonstrate that there is no obvious toxic effect of the cryoprotectants employed here for slow freezing or vitrification on the in vitro-matured oocytes, but the developmental potential of cryopreserved oocytes to the blastocyst stage is severely impaired.


Table 1.  Effect of slow freezing or exposure to freezing medium of matured cat oocytes on the development to the blastocyst stage in vitro
T1