CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 20(1)

119 ENDOMETRIAL CO-CULTURE MODELS FOR THE IN VITRO INVESTIGATION OF EARLY EMBRYO–MATERNAL CROSSTALK IN CATTLE

K. Zitta, S. Ulbrich, E. Wolf and M. Boelhauve

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 20(1) 139 - 140

Abstract

Cellular and molecular changes in the endometrium during the preimplantation period are orchestrated by a complex network of molecules. The endometrium consists mainly of epithelial (EC) and stromal cells (SC) which produce a variety of active factors, such as prostaglandins (PG), in response to hormones and embryonic signals. However, it is unknown whether and how EC and SC influence each other in their reaction to these endo- and paracrine stimuli. To address this question, we measured the PG secretion of separately cultured EC and SC, and of EC+SC co-cultures in an insert system (0.2 µm membrane pore size) allowing exchange of secreted factors, but no direct contact between EC and SC. Bovine endometrial cells were isolated from cow uterus by a combination of mechanical and enzymatic procedures on Day 8 of the estrous cycle (ovarian morphology). Isolated EC and SC (90% purity) were cultured in DMEM/F12 containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. PGE2 and PGF concentrations in media from separately cultured EC and SC or co-cultured EC+SC were measured by specific ELISAs after 24 h of stimulation with (i) 100 nm oxytocin (OXT); (ii) 100 ng mL–1 interferon tau (IFNT); or (iii) the respective solvent as non-stimulated control. EC responded to OXT stimulation with a decreased PGE2/PGF ratio, although the difference was not significant (PGE2/PGF ratio non-stimulated: 2.4 ± 0.9; PGE2/PGF ratio stimulated: 1.5 ± 0.8; P > 0.05 v. non-stimulated control, evaluated by t-test). No differences in the ratios of PGE2/PGF release into the medium were observed when comparing OXT-treated SC with non-treated SC. Incubating co-cultures of EC and SC with OXT resulted in a statistically significant, 2.5-fold decrease in the PGE2/PGF ratio as compared to non-stimulated cells (0.8 ± 0.2 v. 2.0 ± 0.7; P < 0.05; t-test). In contrast, IFNT stimulation of EC and SC co-cultures shifted PG secretion toward the pregnancy protective PGE2 (PGE2/PGF ratio non-stimulated: 0.99 ± 0.44; PGE2/PGF ratio stimulated: 2.36 ± 0.96; P < 0.05 v. non-stimulated control, by t-test). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that interactions between EC and SC regulate the responsiveness of the co-culture system to OXT and the pregnancy recognition molecule IFNT. We propose that co-culture of both cell types should be used for studying mechanisms of early embryo–maternal communication.



Full text doi:10.1071/RDv20n1Ab119

© CSIRO 2008

 
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012